y

Snow Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor

   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #1  

Jody Marchand

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
31
Location
N.S. Canada
Please Help:
Want To buy a good Quality Snow Blade for my tractor with the Quick Attach. I really like the HLA 2000 series blade. I'm looking at the 72" ( 575 lbs ) or 78" ( 595 lbs ) or the 84" ( 610 lbs ) Blade with the Hydraulic Angle setup. Are these blades too heavy for my tractor? Any help or suggestions would be Great. I live in Canada just an FYI so not many different snow Blade options
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #2  
Your tractor should handle that just fine. I prefer to use a box blade for snow removal as I do most of my snow work in reverse as driving forward over the snow is not always practical which is the way those angled blades are designed to be used.
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #3  
You can go with the 84 weight wise, but keep in mind drive width and what you trying to do. You will need chains on the front tires to steer. I just use my bucket.
Hope this helps
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor
  • Thread Starter
#4  
What width snow blade would work best on the Kioti CK 35? I would like to use the 84" 2000 Series HLA blade weighing 610 lb but would like to hear any feedback on people using the same setup. Any help or suggestions would be great. Thanks
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #5  
I have no direct experience. Sorry. But I would go for the narrowest possible blade that, when angled, would still adequately clear the tractor.

A wider blade will throw the tractor around more and be more likely to break stuff on the blade and the tractor.

Dry snow is not the same as wet snow, obviously.

Weight is your friend. And so are tire chains front and back.

Someone around here must have some first-hand experience to help you. I am just bumping the thread.
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor
  • Thread Starter
#6  
Ok thanks. Hoping someone has a HLA blade setup and can give a few suggestions. Thanks
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor
  • Thread Starter
#7  
I really like the quality of the HLA Snow Blades
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #8  
I really like the quality of the HLA Snow Blades

Speaking of snow, here is what greeted me this morning!



image-3104382649.jpg
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #9  
Holy crap! It's everywhere already!

It's been snowing on and off for a few weeks here.

It has been warm enough that it is melting as it comes. There are only 2-3 inches built up. The ground is saturated and soft!

I hate to say it, but I need it to cool down so I can get the rest of my hay bales off the field.

Brrrrr.
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #10  
I'm not saying your tractor won't handle it but you wold want lots of weight aft and chains I would think.That 600lbs. is heavy out there. I use my bucket.IMG_1577.JPGIMG_1579.JPGIMG_1580.JPGIMG_1595.JPGIMG_1615.JPG
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #11  
I run a 9' Western power angle front snow blade on my DK 35 with chains on all 4 tires.
HPIM1352.JPG
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor
  • Thread Starter
#12  
I have the backhoe on the back on my machine for ballast. Mines a CK not a DK. DK is a bigger stronger tractor.
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #13  
I have the backhoe on the back on my machine for ballast. Mines a CK not a DK. DK is a bigger stronger tractor.
I tried running the backhoe on the back when plowing snow before and IMO it made it much worse to steer when plowing.
I never leave the backhoe on to plow.
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #14  
I've got the 7' (84") HLA plow and Aquiline MPC chains on rear only on my DK-40. Had it for three years, possibly 4- IIRC, this season, and it is excellent. No complaints. I usually have my backhoe on the rear, and that adds 1000#s of ballast, but last winter I had just my BB and was going to add ballast to it, but we had NO snow to speak of so I didn't do any real plowing.
I would go with the smaller plow for your rig, IMHO, the CK is less likely to get beat up by the heft of the lighter 72" plow. You won't be hurting either model plow- they are very heavy duty, and the crossover valve keeps the loader from being wracked by twisting forces; (which for your tractor's loader is no where near as strong, ( read resistant) to twisting forces encountered when plowing heavy wet snow as is the DK's loader.
Think about moving things with the FEL. The forces are mostly in lifting, and the DK-40 has significant capacity even over it's close cousin the DK-35, in lift capacity. More lift capacity via beefier loader arms, pistons, etc. The CK can't compare; that's not a bad thing- it's just a different machine. Consequently, the damage you could do by lateral twisting forces by slinging to big a plow could render your loader into dust; again just my opinion, but I can say I wracked my DK-35 loader, before I traded up to the DK-40 at about 350 hours and less than a year's use, through inexperience and pushing it too hard, and not even with a plow blade, just misuse of the loader.
YMMV.
Part of what I would suggest is tell us what your intended use is: home/farm use, or commercial? This will help us help you decide. You can't go wrong with the HLA plows- they're GREAT at doing the job!
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor
  • Thread Starter
#15  
Just using the blade for personal use to push the high snowbanks back after they build up from plowing with my truck. I have a used 84" HLA 2000 and I may trim it back to 72" to shed some weight.
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #16  
Sounds like a plan, trimming it down some.
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #17  
Cutting it down to 72" would save 35 lbs. according to the spec sheet, hardly worth the bother. Is it in good shape? do you want to sell it? Where in Novi do you live?
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor #18  
Just using the blade for personal use to push the high snowbanks back after they build up from plowing with my truck. I have a used 84" HLA 2000 and I may trim it back to 72" to shed some weight.
Is the tractor having a problem handling the plow the way it is ??
I've been running a 108" front snow plow on my DK 35 with no problems.
 
   / Kioti CK 35 HST ~ Is HLA 2000 72" or 84" Too Much For This Tractor
  • Thread Starter
#19  
I haven't tried it on the tractor yet, just wanted people's opinion. If it's only 35 lbs of weight I'm shedding I think it's not worth cutting it back. Just think I will take it easy with it and not take too much of a bite of snow at a time. To be honest I'm hoping I never have to use it lol. Just want it as a backup in case my truck fails or something and to push back the odd big snow bank. Blade is in great shape so I wold hate to cut it back plus cutting it back I'm getting close to the Plow skid shoes.
 

Marketplace Items

2001 INTERNATIONAL 4900 WATER TRUCK (A58214)
2001 INTERNATIONAL...
2007 Frienghtliner B2 School Bus (A59230)
2007 Frienghtliner...
2016 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIA TANDEM AXL MID ROOF SLEEPER TRUCK (A59905)
2016 FREIGHTLINER...
2013 TEXAS PRIDE LAY FLAT HOSE TUGGER TRAILER (A58214)
2013 TEXAS PRIDE...
Used Landpride GR1525 Stump Grinder
Used Landpride...
2016 VOLVO SD75B SMOOTH DRUM ROLLER (A60429)
2016 VOLVO SD75B...
 
Top