oldpilgrim
Elite Member
I know a lot of people who have gone from gear to hst, including me.
I know no one who has gone from hst to gear.
I know no one who has gone from hst to gear.
Ditto to this.
HST is safer and VERY easy to operate. To me, anyone who has less than 200 acres to care for is an excellent candidate for HST. All the talk about back and forth, loss of hp to HST, etc. is actually not an issue under 200 acres. Everyone in this category does LOTS of back and forth, careful travel around objects, very little of dozens of hours of ground engagement equipment where HP could be a concern under some few specialized circumstances. HST simply is great, and the reliability of the transmission is superb. Fatigue is dramatically reduced by using an HST over a shifting transmission...and if operating for numerous hours, fatigue is a major contributor to accidents.
There are some who see it differently...ask them if they have daily used an HST...I cannot recommend it highly enough, even considering some additional cost over alternative transmissions...worth it, IMHO.
after this testimony, I'm sold on hst for sure, but I definitely want some sort of cruise control function
What made me question hst to begin with is the local Deere dealer told me his hst Deere tractors didn't have any cruise option and that it was only sub compact tractors that had something like that. I just need to go see for myself, but I wanted be informed before I heard any pitches
I know for a fact the Deere 3032E and 3038E have cruise control as an option...they even have a big blue arrow pointing to the switch on the product pageOn the 3R series cruise control is standard. Going up in size the 4M series has cruise as an option, and the 4R has cruise standard.
This sort of stuff is why I really don't put much faith in what tractor sales people say....they frequently don't know much about the machines they sell.
Would you like to inch or better yet 1/2 inch up to your tailgate on your truck to load or unload something? try that with gear! HST all the way!
We had two John deere 1972 140s lawn tractors hst when I was growing up. I tried to tear it up by going full forward then slam it in reverse so I would not have to cut grass(this was on pavement!) never had a problem with them!
I hate to be a shameless promoter of my own video, but if you want to see how slow a hydro Kioti can go:
Great example. A picture is worth 1000 words.
Thanks again for the great example and video. HST appears to be way above and beyond geared. I cant wait until I figure out what I'm going to get. At least know I know that HST is a must. It seems that HST is much superior to shuttle as I picture shuttle just like a geared transmission with just a seamless lever move to reverse. I'm sure there are threads comparing shuttle vs hst as I am not the first in this boat. I need to go do some test drives.
I will say that, without a doubt, a Gear will put the HP to the ground much more efficiently, with more raw power. So, in ground engagement applications, plowing, discing, cultivating, etc...the Gear is actually better.
We all say this, but I'm not sure it's an entirely accurate way to describe what's going on for people that don't understand it. When we say putting power to the ground, some people get confused and think there's a difference in where the tires meet the ground, and that isn't the case (I know you know this). HST uses more engine power to function, so we get less power at the driveshaft for a given amount of engine power. What happens between the driveshaft and the ground is the same...probably just semantics![]()
so when comparing a 45hp HST to a 45hp gear on a dyno at the rear wheel as an example, the gear would have more hp at the rear wheel... is this accurate based on what I have read?
the gear has somewhat of a mechanical advantage over the HST..?