Tom_Veatch
Platinum Member
EdKing said:I don't really have a comment on the splice, but that log splitter looks pretty scary to me. :0
I think I'd rather be the guy carrying the logs than the guy feeding that monster.
EdKing said:I don't really have a comment on the splice, but that log splitter looks pretty scary to me. :0
bx24 said:They loaded up the cable and predictably, it snapped somewhere in the middle and NOT at the eyes.
Im wondering why you would ever want/need to make a loop that was 5X the strength of the cable.txslowpoke said:On a mechanical splice or hand splice we will pull 2 or 3 strands(6x36 for example) and weave them back in on the bottom side of eye, be it thimble or standard eye application. The number of strands is dictated by the splicer . Both methods have been pull tested to 5 times the breaking strength of cable applied to and are approved industry wide.
txslowpoke said:For those under the impression 1 man can splice an eye into 2" wire rope,
you just won the stupid award is all I can say.
The facts have been stated. Doubt is optional. I dont know why you expect others to tell you the facts and, as has been done, give pertinent brief explanation, and then be responsible for dispelling doubt of unstated nature. You need to satisfy your doubt by consulting reference materials. Try a key word search in Google.Botabill said:First let me say I really appreciate BX24 posting this relatiely quick repair idea. Although I have some idea about physics and friction I'm not any sort of expert. My only real experience in knots and splices took place many years ago while I was an apprentice carpenter. I was required to know knots and various splices and their strengths. Unfortunaltely I forget what that particular slices strength value is. I will however use it with caution. If life or injury become possible I will do the research and not depend on my opinion or how many people yelled the loudlest and longest that they are right. Perhaps the next person who posts here will do that and settle the matter with facts not opinions. I really doubt that BX24 cares which way the facts will fall. He was just generously sharing useful information for us to take or not.
SPYDERLK said:The facts have been stated. Doubt is optional. I dont know why you expect others to tell you the facts and, as has been done, give pertinent brief explanation, and then be responsible for dispelling doubt of unstated nature. You need to satisfy your doubt by consulting reference materials. Try a key word search in Google.
larry
cityfarma said:I did not realise that disagreeing with a post would bring out so much discussion. I have read all opinions and therefore am prepared to agree with some points but have not changed my original postulation. As demonstrated with a 3 strand cable, I maintain that the strength is less than 100% but not as low as I had originally thought. With 3 strands the weakest point is the single strand side at the main cable but (as I now have had pointed out) the pull is 1/2 of the total pull or about 2/3 of breaking strain. In cables with more strands such as 4/5 the strength is closer to 100% as the split is closer to 1:1 each side. In this I have assumed a long splice so friction is high and the splice does not slip.
I also agree with Sandman that very few cables are used anywhere near their breaking strain therefore few will break even if the splice is less than 100%.
Cityfarma
5' may be an accepted length for testing some splices on some cable sizes. I would never test this splice on a 5' sample on anything larger than 1/4' cable. The reason is that this type of splice has to bed in such that strands share the load without intense loading of isolated strands. Some small amount of interstrand slip must happen while this bedding in occurs. If the cable is short relative to its diameter then there is not enuf length in the strands so that they can stretch elastically by an amount sufficient to ease the imperfections inherent in the 'green' splice. The cable sample should be many multiples of its diameter and the pull end must be captured/consolidated well. The splice should be loaded cyclicly several times at increasing levels in order to realize the full strength. The splice will be stronger than the parent cable if the tail is tied in well and the loop is allowed to season briefly in light to medium duty use. It will be stronger because there are 2X the strands carrying the load in the loop.sandman2234 said:I stand by my statement, after having tested more 5' samples of rope wire (to failure) than most of you have handled in your lifetimes, except maybe for a few select persons, that the spliced loops will fail prior to the rope reaching 100 % of its capacity. For most of us, that is way more than we will ever put it thru, but as shown, it will not be able to handle the entire strength of the cable.
I understand yours too, but lets work with that a minute. I would say your modulus will be higher with a cyclicly seasoned cable because the load will be more evenly shared. Yes, some cable strands will be unavoidable strained during bed in but the plastic stretch this entails will be small to non existent if the sample has real world length. This much more ideal [and real] situation would have little corrupting influence on the modulus measurement.sandman2234 said:Correctly preformed wire rope should already be "bedded", but I understand your reasoning. However, for Modulus of Elasticity measurements, you can't load and unload the sample without messing with the final results. A piece of 5' cable will probably stretch about a foot before reaching maximum load and failing. A properly designed test machine should have the proper grips to hold the cable without pinching, or allowing the cable to load in an unbalanced method. However, these are lab tests, and the O/P was suggesting anything but that.
David from jax