toppop52
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2011
- Messages
- 10,619
- Location
- Eastern Shore of Maryland
- Tractor
- Massey Ferguson 1723, Cub Cadet 1864
Certainly true for flu... possibly not so much with non-respiratory viruses ... like a virus that uses bodily fluids for transmission, like say Ebola.
Having said that, we knew going in that this was a novel virus ...
I would think that a conservative approach in such a case would dictate caution ... until we better understood exactly what we were dealing with.
It's also relatively easy to be careful ... wear a mask and socially distance.
I’m not seeing where I disagree with you. I’m just saying it was an easy leap early on when it was considered a respiratory only virus. Now they know better, thus the hindsight comment.