N80
Super Member
Think they need to borrow my avatar?
We're not beating the horse now, we're just keeping the flies off.
Don't ask me why.
Think they need to borrow my avatar?
I put double quotes around a healthy pet peeeve. what is real work, a fisherman would think it's another typo. Personally I think everything I do is on the real side.
(other than typing gibberish late at nite here), that's just plain fun.
this is supposed to be about gear/hydro not how much can sombody afford or how far can i puff out my chest...
nobody answered yet if they have syncro on a CUT...
George, for cryin out loud, it took you 50 pages to say you never used one. Where are the flys?
N80,
Your points on pulling a 2 bottom or what ever in "just barely" mode with a gear tractor and not able to with an HST is fallacious.
There are 3 HP's that are important with tractors, as you know. (I'm adding this for those that are less knowledgeable).
But, there is also the drawbar HP. That's the load that can be pulled. It's a function of tire design, weight and 3pt design geometry. An L4400 FST, GST and HST will all be too close to distinguish in drawbar hp with the same tires, balance and geometry of all are practically identical.
I know I can pull a 2x14 bottom plow with a L3410 hst thru sod bound soil that hasn't seen tillage in 20+ years.
But it would take at least a 15 hp jump to pull an extra bottom and to get that hp gain, it's more than the typical cost difference gear to hst.
Maybe I do more loader work than most. Dunno. But I feel more is done in less time with the smaller hst tractor, and it's on the order of hours per day and not fractional minutes when there is a job exceeding a day's length.
I mean good grief, there are guys here admitting that they have HST tractors with R4's on them. I don't know about you, but I don't want those guys in the same locker room with me. (Unwad panties fellows, its a joke).
I put double quotes around a healthy pet peeeve. what is real work, a fisherman would think it's another typo. Personally I think everything I do is on the real side. (other than typing gibberish late at nite here), that's just plain fun.
this is supposed to be about gear/hydro not how much can sombody afford or how far can i puff out my chest...
nobody answered yet if they have syncro on a CUT...
jake
what's up? you guys all trying out pandora.com? i can't hear you...
N80 I'm assuming that was directed at me and my useless tractor.![]()
I've wasted more time on TBN this week posting comments that contribute absolutely nothing than I have in 6 months.![]()
OK, maybe I just drive into a pile differently.
I don't see a need to push at all hard at zero speed, I tend to lift/curl as I go into the pile with the clutch fully engaged..
Just like what PTO intensive jobs that a gear transmission's 5% makes a noticeable difference for that same 99.999% ? You can't often buy a larger sized attachment based on 1-2 more hp. And if $$ are a concern the added cost of the larger attachment needs to be considered too. But... These "theoretical" argumentative points are delving down into the nit-picking area.
The tractors with hst are often the ones that are also "feature encrusted" as one poster put it where the gear tractors are "economy". Not a real fair comparison as the hst is blamed for all the cost differential. It's more a features vs economy argument. Would the argument still hold if the economy tractor was manual steering and the hst was powersteering? The PS pump takes hp away from the pto same as the HST does? Better go strip off that pump so you can get a 73" rotary cutter...
Some seem to be against any improvements. I'll bet they wish they had a hand crank on the front of the machine too. Then they could get rid of the alternator and have a 74" cutter.
Let's get real. They make multiple options for multiple uses and likes/dislikes. Why does it make a difference what a person that you will never see buys? I for one don't have a stock portfolio based on HST transmissions!
jb
Recognizing that I might anger the safety gods here is my tale. My implements are stored outside and hooking up to my Bush Hog was always a fight. I have a hard time twisting around so getting a good alignment to the Bush Hog was difficult. usually I could get one side hooked and would need to move something to hook the other side. The Bush Hog was too heavy for me to move. Vernon
Don't think a gear drive is stronger. All the power is transferred through the same weak stub axles which do break.
The hydrostat might be far better for insurance against breakage.
I tend to do similar to what you do.. drive into a pile, clutch fully engaged, lifting and curling the bucket as i go.. when the tires start to slip.. that's when I've got the bucket full enough and tip her full back and start my reverse... no clutch slipping other than for normal change of direction..
soundguy
Thanks!So there's a chart around the edge of the tach with different rings for different gears for different RPMS? Anyone got a picture of that. Sounds interesting.
You and I have had this discussion before... you actually do real work with your machines and most of these folks do not.![]()
![]()
I think the working definition of real work is the work that you get paid for and wouldn't be doing if you didn't..
It was a joke between Soundguy and me. I have a little dinky tractor and he has some big iron.
Yep.. here's a pic... meter denotes rpm in hundreds.. and there is a ring for each gear that shows ground speed in mph.. thus.. look at the needle, and then choose the ring for the gear you are in.. and you have ground speed... etc.
soundguy