Egon
Epic Contributor
The proper thing to do might involve shielding all the good scotch that's in the house.
All most of us can do is speculate...logic says the more dire the circumstances the more strict freedoms could become...
"They" (contingency planners) know they could never really disarm the public...in recent instances they have banned any public possession by civilians...likely to start there with zero tolerance...if they really wanted to actually confiscate firearms they would likely use purchase records and concealed carry permit applications to start...long before they would do massive random searches etc...
I know it sounds kind of crazy, but everyone needs a CB radio. Primitive, but how else could neighbors talk?
The added reality is the government can only hope that people do NOT organize. This is where there is strength in numbers. Citizens NEED to realize that they are stronger if they work together, NOT every man for themself.
I thought of that. Their increasingly complicated systems barely work now.
Bingo.It would be hard to use "purchase records" for gun confiscation if the systems are fried.
It would be hard to use "purchase records" for gun confiscation if the systems are fried.