Electric tractor

   / Electric tractor #21  
I never thought you were trying any of this. From your question, I thought maybe you were involved in the electric forklift field. I was a Field service tech/foreman/warehouse maintenance manager for 22 years before opening my shop. This field isn't too large, thought maybe we may have crossed paths somewhere.
 
   / Electric tractor #22  
Hey Wayne , yes I am involved in the lift truck field, we may have crossed paths at some time.
 
   / Electric tractor #24  
Sorry I had to answer the phone,,,,,I work for the Crown dealership in Wilkes-Barre was a field tech for a few years, did some time in service sales/training, and currently I am a field manager. Who did you work for?
 
   / Electric tractor #25  
Holy smokes! I actually worked for the Crown factory. I placed Top Gun at a Turret sideloader school. I worked mainly out in N.Y. as the pay was way more than Pa. pays. Your company owner actually offered me $14 an hour to work there, with a top gun in TS on my resume. I told him "Thanks for lunch." Then I went to work for Manchester Ind. They promised to keep me closer to home than I used to be working in N.Y. Yea, right. I ended up further from home. So, I heard you guys got the Kane Tunkhannock contract. Looking for any techs? I ran that operation for a year before I left Manchester. I could tell you some good stuff. I think maybe we should talk sometime.
 
   / Electric tractor #26  
Wayne County Hose said:
Interesting idea. The one big drawback for you is the limited use. [[[The batteries in a high draw machine such as this are made to be discharged down to 80% discharged, rested 8 hours, then charged.]]] Your application would be very similar to a forklift application. For short uses, less than 4 hours a day, you are far better off with an IC power. You would destroy a set of batteries in a couple years using them the way you would like.
[[[I have to wonder at the reason for this charging regimen.]]] Lead acid batteries all suffer from deep discharge. 80% Depth of Discharge is never better than DoD in the range of 20 to 50% before recharge -- assuming the charger is smart and does not overcharge the batt. That, as you mention in a later post, causes heating and more rapid electrolyte loss. Perhaps the rest period is to assure the batt has a chance to cool and the 80% DoD is to allow for a dumb charger that does not conclude the charge cycle properly as the battery reaches full charge. Combine that with poor monitoring of fluid level and your battery will have a problem.
larry
 
   / Electric tractor #27  
Dang,, talk about crossing paths,, I use to work in the Penns Best facility across the road, don't know if our timeframes matched though as I have been off the road for 5 or 6 years. Yea we have gotten all their business, in fact we are doing an install for them in Pittston currently. We are always on the look for techs, we are growing so fast, I have 18 on the road at present and could use a few more.
 
   / Electric tractor #28  
Most modern chargers are very smart, after proper installation and setup require nothing from the operator except to plug in the discharged battery, they even "know" when to equalize the battery. The big problem with the new chargers is they are so sensitive a battery discharged much beyond the 80% is seen by the charger as the wrong voltage for the charger and the charger will not cycle on it's own, and requires things I will not detail to cycle the charger. At greater than 80% discharge damage is done not only to the battery, but also the components of the vehicle as well, the combination of the two will result in unnecessary higher cost of operation of the equipment and of course should be avoided. Lack of electrolyte during the charging process is a two edged sword, an energy barrier starts to build on the exposed plates, at first it slows the transfer of energy, then it inhibits it altogether, causing reduced energy storage,,,then the barrier starts to flake off and starts to fill from the bottom of the cell up further depleting the capacity of the battery.
 
   / Electric tractor #29  
Wayne County Hose said:
That little thing isn't worth the scrap it's made out of.
First of all, the drive wheels have about 1.5 hp each after losses, it would barely climb a small grade.
Second, they have no provisions for turning. No, I don't mean the steering wheel. On a dual drive motor truck, you need to have provisions to slow down or stop the inside drive wheel when turning. Kind of like what spider gears do in a rear axle. This can be done with either limit switches on the steering or electrically thru the controller with a steering feedback sensor. And I could go on for pages.
Personally, I would have gone with a 36v controller. This way you keep the amps down prolonging the life of all the electrical components. If I were to build anything larger, it would be at least 72 volts. I would go with higher voltages except for lack of obtaining a controller. I know that 72v controllers are easily obtainable, I don't know about higher voltage.
If anyone is interested, some good motor controller companies are Curtis, General Electric, and a fairly new one on the scene is Danaher. The cheapest and most popular are the Curtis units. GE has gotten their butts kicked lately by the other 2. I've worked on some of Danaher's stuff, DC power converted to AC to power the motors. Their stuff is very reliable, but pricey too. Also, AC drive is the way to go. Most forklift manufacturers have converted over to AC drive and lift systems. Some Forklift manufacturers don't even make a DC motor anymore. I can set-up an AC powered forklift to smoke the drive tires. DC trucks could never do that. Pretty funny seeing an 8,000 lb. electric forklift smoking the tires.
Ugh, now you guys have me thinking about building an electric powered vehicle again.

Strong criticism indeed.

Hi all,

I'm the builder of the wee electric tractor in question and would like to make a few comments.

The machine isn't made out of scrap. I'm not sure why Wayne County Hose describes it as being so. It's made out of the usual range of engineering components and materials. The most notable difference is the use of timber for the structure - but timber has a long history of use as a structural material. None of it is made from scrap.

I can assure you all it can easily climb a small grade. The "rated" power output of the drive motors is as stated on the web site, although if you are used to the power ratings of IC engines beware of direct power comparisons between electric motors and IC engines - they can be very misleading. For those interested in it's hauling capacity I recently used the prototype to haul small 1/4 ton trailers of gravel when I was laying a new driveway - it had no difficulty moving these loads whatsoever. It may be a small machine but it has no difficulty hauling the loads it was designed for. The drive is designed to produce peak torques up to the limit of traction of the wheels on grippy (dry asphalt) conditions. Under more usual operation on grass, dirt etc the wheels will loose traction and spin before the drive motors stall. In my judgment this is adequate for its intended use as putting in more torque capacity than can be usefully harnessed unnecessarily adds cost to what is intended as a low cost design. (DC drive motors are capable of producing peak torques of several times their "rated" continuous use torque on which rated power is quoted - and these torques are available right down to zero output shaft speed.)

Indeed this is a dual motor drive machine. However there is no need for independent speed control of the two drive wheels to enable turning. The speed/torque characteristics of DC PM motors are such that two can be driven in parallel from a single motor controller and still provide effective differential wheel behaviour during cornering. The tractor has no difficulty turning at full steering lock and without any wheel scuffing. There is a consequential partial movement of drive torque towards the inboard wheel, however this does not noticeably affect the steering behaviour under most driving conditions. Where any effect is noticeable it is if you try to apply power fast with the vehicle stationary and the steering hard over, in which case there is some understeer as the drive resists the turn - the solution is to move off more slowly if the front wheels are at full lock and to pick up speed as you straighten up - good driving practice surely.

The satisfactory differential behaviour is a result of the way that (for a given voltage) shaft speed and torque are related in the DC PM motors - as the vehicle turns the outboard wheel runs slightly faster than its natural speed and its torque output reduces slightly, the inboard wheel runs slightly slower and its torque output increases. This difference in drive torques does tend to resist the steering, however it is a question of magnitude. The torque difference is not sufficient to overcome the steering moment generated by the front wheels over the majority of drive conditions for the vehicle. In vehicles with higher power/weight ratios the effect may well be more pronounced but this is not a design failure of this machine and should not be represented as such.

In the event that some assistance with tight turning was required the most convenient way to implement this effectively in the machine would be through independent braking on the rear wheels - not by adding further electrical complexity and cost.

Whereas a 36V system would be perfectly acceptable choice, and higher volatges will generally result in lower current draw for the same power throughput the real issue is the engineering significance of this general principal. The 24V components used are fully rated for the currents being drawn at 24V and there are no reliability, availability or cost problems with their use. In general any of a range of voltages could be designed into this machine and all would be acceptable in engineering terms, 24V is quite suitable for this size of vehicle and is cost-effective.

As it has a low power drive the AC option is not cost effective.

For higher power machines such as those more generally discussed on these forums the design issues change and the technical solutions are indeed likely to change from those I've used on this small tractor. My technical comments above are not aimed at these higher power applications but to clarify the engineering design of this machine as it has been criticised.

If the design of my wee DIY electric tractor doesn't meet the needs of users of larger machines - fair enough (and hardly surprising given its size), but this does not justify its description as being worthless - especially on a public forum.

Ian

Built For Fun EV's.

PS Happy New Year to all from here in Scotland
 
   / Electric tractor #30  
Ian, believe it or not, I'm actually glad you found this post. What I should have stated was that it wasn't worth it's weight in scrap. As far as the turning goes, in ANY dual drive motor unit, without slowing down the inside drive wheel, there are negative effects, period. You would rather have the tires scuffing than not. With the tires scuffing, at least it's the terra firma below the unit taking the abuse and not the drive train. With the inside drive holding it's traction, now you have a situation where your inside drive motor is trying to turn, and can't. This results in a motor stalling condition, higher amp draw, excessive torque placed on the components, and so on. With your attention paid to this in your post, I know that this is a concern to you. Now, knowing that this unit doesn't have the power to turn it's inside drive wheel in a turn, this tells me that this unit is underpowered. Also, I have never seen a dual drive motor vehicle without any kind of inner drive wheel speed control that gave satisfactory turning performance. If you have done this, you have created a machine that some of the top engineers here in the states haven't been able to. They spend thousands of dollars in each unit to accomplish this and if they could avoid it, they would.
This is a unit built for what function? Hauling a couple flower pots around the yard? If you want to impress me, put a mower deck under it. As for moving 500 lbs. of gravel, placed in a pneumatic tire wagon, my 10 year old daughter could move this around.

For the size of this unit, you are correct in choosing 24v power. I have seen much larger electric units powered by less voltage. 24v is a good choice.

You have made a valiant effort here and I applaud that. However, other than what I stated above, I stand behind my earlier post. Turning off the inside drive motor is basic common knowledge among anyone involved in powered electric vehicles. Without being able to turn off the inside drive motor, and without a mower deck, this machine is basically useless to 98% of the public.
 
   / Electric tractor #31  
Hi,

I am content for my points to remain as stated; they are given in good faith and I believe them to be factually correct. The vehicle is perfectly able to manouevre without self damage and to haul the loads it was intended for.

What function? The vehicle is designed to be an interesting DIY build project and to provide utility once built for light haulage duties around the yard and garden. This is clear from the web site. It may well be that 98% of the population wouldn't be interested in it for the simple reason that they would have to built it themselves.

I have several links from the site with information on DC motor controllers, motors, component suppliers etc for any readers who are interested in reading up on smaller DC electric drives. For anyone who is interested in other builders attempts at electric tractors this site might be of interest - mainly smaller machines but some larger ones on page 2. The full site has a huge collection of home built EV's and conversions and is very interesting.

EVAlbum: Search Results

For some general info on higher power AC drives people are using for electric conversions this might be of interest.

High End AC Drive Systems and Power Electronics for Electric Vehicles


Cheers,

Ian

BuiltForFun EV's
 
   / Electric tractor #32  
Ian, I am impressed with you elec garden tractor. I also believe Wayne is also impressed, but he is stating that it wouldn't have any practical use for tillage ect.
I have an old David Bradley 2 wheeled garden tractor that was my late brothers that doesn't have an engine. He loved messing with the old thing and act. worked a garden with it before the 1 1/2 HP gas engine went TU.
I now have it and have contemplated putting a elec drive on it. Maybe some of your ideas would work for it. It could have a small PV charged that wouldn't burn any fossil and no more than it would be used a small PV would provide enough charging for it. Any Ideas? Thanls, later, Nat
 
   / Electric tractor #33  
Nat, here is what I suggest to you or anyone else that would like to try this. Look in the yellow pages under "Material handling Equipment." You are looking for forklift dealers, mainly the ones that carry electric units. Given a choice, try one that carries "Crown" brand forklifts. They tend to be very public friendly dealerships. Next, try yale, Hyster, Clark, etc. Even though they make great forklifts, stay away from Raymond as all their electronics(most anyway) are made by them. Very difficult to do anything with. All the others use Curtis or G.E. stuff, plentiful and easy to work on. Call and ask for a service supervisor. Explain to him what you are trying to do. Ask if they have any scrap units that you can buy some parts from. You are probably going to want 24 volt. The only issue I can see is that most of the forklift drive motors I can remember removing all had splined shafts. Maybe you could have the splines machined off and a pulley installed. I would probably pick what's called a walkie rider unit as the motors are plenty powerful and they have simple electronics. You want to remove the drive motor, should be between the control handle and the drive tire. Also the controller and any wire that is even thinking about running near it. Also remove the control handle as this is where the potentiometer is housed. The "speed pot" sends a signal to the control unit, the control unit processes that signal and then tells the drive motor how fast to turn. Ask the dealer for a schematic for that unit. Theory of operation wouldn't hurt either, but I can provide you with that. I have a stack of forklift manuals from the floor tp the ceiling. If you or anyone else would like to try this, I would give all the help I can. I have 22 years experience as an electric forklift mechanic. JS5020 can help also as we both have about the same knowledge. Joe, I hope you don't mind that I just volunteered you. :) By the way, try to get a controller that's one box, not a system with a bunch of wires and components. The one module controller is much easier to work with. You might see something like "EV-100." That was probably the best system ever made, but not for a rookie to work on. Good luck and let me know if you need anything, Andy.
 
   / Electric tractor #34  
Ian, I looked at some of the electric tractors on the link you posted above. I am thoroughly impressed. This just may inspire me to build one. I have a connection for AC converters and motors. The only problem with the AC drives avaqilable to me is their complexity. They add so much more to the machine than is necessary for this application. But, the benefits may be worth it. If anyone is considering building one of these, Ian's link above is a must see.
 
   / Electric tractor #35  
Well thanks for the vote of confidence Wayne, I would be happy to help anyone trying a build using lift truck parts. Wayne some of the crown motors have a replaceable "stub" on the end of the armature, the stub is pressed on and held with a roll pin,,, replace the stub with one made to your own spec and you have a nice motor with bearings on both ends. As Wayne said stay away from raymond,,, most of their parts are proprietary, expensive and sometimes difficult to obtain. Any of the ge, curtis and sevcon systems are good as they come in my book,,, lots of ev-100's out there and they are one of the best systems around. Just make sure you get everything needed, panel, motor, contactors, display if ev-100 lx series, potentiometer or accelerator and so on.

The AC stuff is Nice just boxes and cables, and it does have capabilities beyond our imagination,,, Wayne that tsp 6000 is run by 6 or 7 boxes, no cards like the older ones, wire guide set up takes about 4 minutes, and you never have to leave the seat.
 
   / Electric tractor #36  
I think Ian's 1300w yard tractor is exactly what I need. Something for short trips on the farm, electric so I don't need jumper cables or starting fluid for every little trip - this will work great for taking the trash down the driveway to the curb, short spraying or hauling trips etc. And maybe the wife won't be afraid of it. I don't need a lot of power, since that's what the real tractor is for.... My original plan was to convert a junk lawn tractor to electric using a golf cart engine, which probably would be easier, but if that was what I liked to do, I wouldn't be hanging out in the "build it yourself" section....

So Ian's post talked me into it, I bought the plans earlier today. Very detailed, and appears to be well done. But Ian, time to change over from that silly Metric system......

Jeff
 
   / Electric tractor #37  
js5020 said:
Well thanks for the vote of confidence Wayne, I would be happy to help anyone trying a build using lift truck parts. Wayne some of the crown motors have a replaceable "stub" on the end of the armature, the stub is pressed on and held with a roll pin,,, replace the stub with one made to your own spec and you have a nice motor with bearings on both ends. As Wayne said stay away from raymond,,, most of their parts are proprietary, expensive and sometimes difficult to obtain. Any of the ge, curtis and sevcon systems are good as they come in my book,,, lots of ev-100's out there and they are one of the best systems around. Just make sure you get everything needed, panel, motor, contactors, display if ev-100 lx series, potentiometer or accelerator and so on.

The AC stuff is Nice just boxes and cables, and it does have capabilities beyond our imagination,,, Wayne that tsp 6000 is run by 6 or 7 boxes, no cards like the older ones, wire guide set up takes about 4 minutes, and you never have to leave the seat.


Oops, forgot about the contactors.:eek: tsp 6000 all modules??? Well, about time. But, puts the old tech like me out to pasture. Now even the rookies should be able to do it. There's nothing like troubleshooting an old 1st gen TS with cableform. Heck Joe, that's probably before your time. I have written modifications and submitted them to the factory. Don't you know they showed up in service bulletins. I got absolutely nothing for it. Didn't even get the credit as the guys I was submitting them to took all the credit. So, here I am in Pigsknuckle PA making hydraulic hoses.Yeeee-haaaaa.
 
   / Electric tractor #38  
When I got started they were just phasing out the M210 panel and the cutting edge technology was the Ev-1,,,, man were old.
 
   / Electric tractor #39  
Hi Nat,

If you could be patient and educate up this Glaswegian lad could you let me know what a PV is? Also do you have a photo or could you post a link to a photo of the tractor?

An issue that frequently arises is the choice of electric motor power to replace an IC engine in your case what might be needed to replace a 1.5 HP unit. It may be worth making just a few points here that might help others who may be pondering the possibilities of electric drives.

IC power ratings are usually of peak power output they are quoted at the particular combination of shaft speed and shaft torque that produces the biggest power output (Power = Torque x Speed, Watts = Nm x rad/s). Broadly speaking the engine isn't capable of producing more torque than that implied by the peak power figure and attempting to load the engine with a higher torque stalls the engine. (Okay, the peak power and peak torque conditions might not be exactly the same point but they are usually not too far apart).

Electric motors are rated differently however, and a number of different rating methods can be used. One common one is the motor's continuous use rating (s1) this is usually based on the full loaded shaft speed of the motor and the continuously rated shaft torque. This torque is however a bit different from that for the IC engine in that it is not the maximum torque that the motor can produce - nothing like it, it is the torque that matches the current flow through the machine which does not produce overheating in the motor (in DC machines torque is approximately proportional to the current drawn). There are other ratings s2, s3 etc and these are power ratings based on shaft speed and the various higher torque (hence current) levels that can be sustained by the motor for more limited time periods. Electric motors can typically produce torques several times their continuous rating but for limited time periods and are routinely used in various applications in this way.

So where does this get us? To get a feel for what size of electric motor is needed to replace a known IC engine power we might start with the questions - how long do I want the machine to run continuously at the peak torque level of the IC engine being replaced, and how well do I need it to hold top speed under this loading? If you need the machine to operate continuously at what was the IC engine's peak torque output and to sustain its higher operational speeds at that torque level you will need to fit a motor with a continuous rating close to the peak rating of the IC engine. (This motor will substantially out-perform the IC engine in other circumstances however because it can produce much higher torques levels for short term bursts watch the strength of the transmission.)

If, however, as is the case in many types of vehicles, the peak torque is only really needed for short term bursts of activity and won't be sustained for lengthy periods then an electric motor with a continuous rating much less than the peak rating of the IC engine could be used. This will be able to provide the short term intermittent peak torques from within the intermittent use area of it's performance envelope so long as they are not sustained long enough to cause overheating. The normal lower power duties will fall within the continuous use area of its operation and won't be a problem.

If these sums are done for normal road-going passenger cars for example then numbers come out indicating that an electric motor with a continuous rating of roughly 25% of the peak power rating of the IC engine might be a good place to start (see the AC drive site from my previous post). I suspect that working tractors are going to be higher than this because they will spend more time using more of the power available but just how much I couldn't say, that's an interesting question for all you tractor users. How fully utilised is the available power on your machine (and for what periods of time)? This might not be a very easy question to answer but I have a feeling that many experienced tractor users will have quite a good feel for how often their machines get close to stalling and under what circumstances. If so it might be possible to define a rough duty cycle to use to select the electric motor size.

I would guess maybe a power rating for the electric motor of 30 to 40% of that of the IC engine being replaced might be a start point but that really is a guess not to be relied on.

Off course for smaller power drives the question may be less important than for bigger machines where there is more money at stake. For example 1200W (1.6HP) continuously rated DC PM motors designed for vehicle use can be bought in the US for less than $100 and agonising about whether you can get away with a smaller cheaper motor might not be worth the time.

The cost of these types of motors (and the cost of DC motor controllers) contributes to the popularity of DC drives on lower power applications. They are also simple systems to implement in that the electronics is all packaged in the controller and there does not in most vehicle applications need to be any informational feedback between the driven motors and the controllers. 4 quadrant (fwd/rev & regenerative braking) DC controllers up to 300 Amp capacity are widely available and can pack quite a punch.

I'm afraid I don't have many movie clips of the wee tractor in use, but for readers interested in what simple DC drives in vehicles can do have a look at this link.

Movie clips

The vehicle in the photos/clips isn't a tractor (obviously) but a replica veteran car. It uses exactly the same drive motors and controller in the same dual drive setup as the tractor (although the reduction ratio of the transmission is different). I ended up reducing the power output for the final version because there was more power there in the 1300W drive than was probably good for it. Movie clips 1 through 4 are probably of most interest and show it just recently out the workshop and having its first test runs. (The clunking was my dodgy front suspension design which I subsequently changed.)

Apologies if I'm teaching folks to suck eggs here, I hope all this info will be helpful.

Jeff,

Thanks very much for the plans order, it's much appreciated.

I'm sorry about the metric units this is a perennial problem for me as I have many US based customers. We too in the UK have an imperial measurement past but all education and most engineering practice is now metric in common with the rest of Europe and other parts of the world - time for you guys to change over?

Interestingly many of our materials and components dimensions give away their imperial past and are just metric conversions, and there are several close equivalents that can be used 1/2 ply instead of 12mm, 1/4 fastening hardware instead of M6, your #35 roller chains and sprockets will do instead of our 3/8 pitch UK specs etc etc. Much of the model engineering world here uses imperial measurement and some inch sized materials and components are available but not enough to spec up a whole vehicle. The main irritant is matching bearings to shafts to drill sizes for the bearing housings. We can get whole number mm sized bright steel shafting which matches standard metric bearings whose OD's match standard wood drill sizes which all helps to reduce the extent of any machining required. It's more difficult for me to do this for inch components and I have to trust my US customers can look at the plans and adapt them to suit their sources of supply.

If it helps I put together this equivalence chart for US customers of the antique style vehicle, perhaps I should include it with the tractor design also.

conversions.pdf

Off course if you find in the end you can't use the plans as they are I would be happy to give you a refund.

Cheers all for now.

Ian

Built For Fun EV's
 
   / Electric tractor #40  
Ian, when I referred to PV, I was meaning photo voltaic chargers. Sorry for the confusion. Here is a pic of the 2 wheeled tractor. It has a clutch made into the pulley mounted to the gearbox that could be removed and a direct chain drive could be put in it's place. A battery or 2 could sit on the engine mount area. It needs weight there so that the weight of the plow or cultivator will be counter balancedany way. I have a set of cultivators and also a lay off plow. The ground speed with the origional engine was too fast as it was so the speed could be controlled with an electric moter. I saw a 650 watt scooter moter with the speed control on E-bay a while back and thought it may work, my estimation made it about 3/4 HP and that would be enough since the origional engine was 1 1/2 and as I said it's grond speed was too high, so gearing it down would increase the torque requiring less HP. I don't know anything about DC drives and didn't know if the 650 watt scooter motor would be suffecient, or have any idea how long a 650 CCA auto battery would work in it. Maybe you or Andy has enough experence with DC drives to give me some insight as to how it would work or if it is even worth the trouble to do it. Thanks, Nat
 

Attachments

  • DSCF0001.JPG
    DSCF0001.JPG
    454.6 KB · Views: 563
  • DSCF0004.JPG
    DSCF0004.JPG
    462.4 KB · Views: 965

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2021 CATERPILLAR D3 LGP CRAWLER DOZER (A60429)
2021 CATERPILLAR...
(APPROX. 20) 4' X 8' X 3/8" SHEETING (A52706)
(APPROX. 20) 4' X...
2019 Freightliner M2 106 AWD Altec DM47BTR Insulated Digger Derrick Truck (A60460)
2019 Freightliner...
Case SV280B (A60462)
Case SV280B (A60462)
2019 GALYEAN EQUIPMENT CO. 150BBL STEEL (A58214)
2019 GALYEAN...
500BBL WHEELED FRAC TANK (A58214)
500BBL WHEELED...
 
Top