Chuck52
Veteran Member
Tch, Tch, IH. No political comments. Besides, I'd rather ride with Ted (who probably never drives himself anymore) than hunt with Quick Draw Cheney.
Chuck
Chuck
LMTC said:So you would rather drown in a car while the driver waits hours to notify anyone that you are in there, than get a few pellets in the face and have immediate medical attention? Just trying to make sure I understand.
This discussion has skirted some pretty touch areas for lots of folks here and done so pretty well so far without bursting into flames. Coming back on an analogy that the first poster probably should not have made with a response that attaches a sarcastic nickname to one of the people involved doesn't seem productive.
I have followed the entire thread. Please note my ENTIRE post in which I stated that I thought the original post, to which you were responding, probably should not have been made as well. How is that one direction?Chuck52 said:IH, no problem. LMTC, go back through the postings on this thread and count the times a certain prominent politician has been mentioned in less than complimentary terms. It's just somewhat amusing that political barbs are only political barbs in one direction. And, no, I don't think I'd be in any particular danger riding in the back seat with Ted while his driver handles the wheel. I'd walk if he were driving himself!
Chuck
tallyho8 said:To be completely fair and impartial to both:
1. They had both been drinking when the accidents occured.![]()
2. Neither one reported it to the press untill the next day.![]()
3. Neither incident contributed highly to Climate Change.![]()
N80 said:Gore is also spending BIG bucks lobbying with the Academy to get an Oscar for his movie. At least that is what Rushbo said...for what its worth.
turbo36 said:Speaking of fair and impartial reporting![]()
I think this is a large part of the problem (GW and otherwise). The various media sources present there "News" as facts, when for the most part it is just entertainment designed to earn the most advertising dollars.dmccarty said:True, but Rush is a talking head not a Journalist so he does not have to be fair or impartial. However the Journalists ARE supposed to be fair and impartial yet they are not by any measure. And THAT is part of the Global Warming discussion.
I suppose it too much to ask that we get fair and impartial reporting on Global Warming or any other subject at the moment since the Journalists are busy "reporting" on the hugely important subjects of Britney cutting her hair and who gets to bury Anna Nicole Smith.
Later,
Dan
dmccarty said:True, but Rush is a talking head not a Journalist
When has he done this?turbo36 said:... he can spout all the venom he wants and profess it to be the truth but when he is caught in a bold face lie he just says "just kidding" folks.