planman8 said:I am updating from a JD 318 to a JD 2305. It should be in the last of this month. I have loved my 318 and will miss it. While I know that the 2305 is much more versatile, I will miss the 318 and it's ability to cut the yard. Of course, cutting is all I could do with it. I am somewhat concerned that the 2305 won't perform as well as the 318 in cutting. Can any of you guys put my mind at ease? The sellsman said that the 2305 would do as well, but what else would a sellsman say? I guess my main concern is the larger turning radius of the 2305 as well as the ROPS.
Right on: It's the best of both worlds.johndeere_2210 said:Just keep the little 318 and run it around the yard for fun!
Own them both
1*First thing I did when I got my BX23 was trim off all low hanging branches that would not clear the ROPS.fgross335_2210 said:Over the years I mowed with a 212, 214 and finally a 322 at my dad's place. The 322 with a 50" deck would be very comparable to your 318. Four years ago I got a 2210/62C. There is no comparison. Smoother, faster, more power reserve. The deck sticks out more to get under things and the foot-controlled hydro can be controlled more smoothly and in my opinion faster than any hand hydro. The hydraulics are better and you can actually manuever around stuff like trees at a very fast pace.
I also got the FEMCO folding ROPS. It is the real deal, fits just like OEM but folds quickly. You will still be higher up than the 318,
1*so limbs that you could sneak under on the 318 may stop you on a 2305.
Nevertheless, the folding ROPS is a great addition if you have trees.
If you were happy with your 318 for mowing
2*I think you'll find the 2305 to be as good or better in almost any situation.
Backup said:1*Is it unreasonable to remove the ROPS entirely?
2*the 2305 is only slightly larger than the big X series tractors that don't have ROPS, and they can have a FEL too.
3*Is it really that dangerous if on mostly flat ground?
4*I've got to believe there are many who have.