Ethanol / E100 -- brewing, cooking, burn, fuel.

/ Ethanol / E100 -- brewing, cooking, burn, fuel. #1  

Phil Timmons

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
542
Ethanol / E100 -- brewing, cooking, burn, fuel.

Anyone here do that?

Probably straight Corn Ethanol. Anyone cook that and/or run it?

If so, what breeds and brands or equipment?

Any special modification to do so?

Thanks!

(btw, please move this if not in correct area?)
 
/ Ethanol / E100 -- brewing, cooking, burn, fuel.
  • Thread Starter
#2  
hmmmm.

Always on the edge of the cutting fashion, it seems.

===============
Exploring Ethanol as a Diesel Alternative with John Deere

===============
 
/ Ethanol / E100 -- brewing, cooking, burn, fuel. #3  
I use the coleman stove burning pump regular gas to make maple syrup. I have three of them, and at times there are 5 pots all boiling.

We have made about three gallons of syrup this season. About average....

The coleman stoves have a wide variability of burner performance that depends on the ambient temperature.

Warm fuel works better ;-)
 
/ Ethanol / E100 -- brewing, cooking, burn, fuel. #4  
Researchers still have a long way to go before this is an acceptable fuel for diesel engines. Lack of lubricity is a major problem.
 
/ Ethanol / E100 -- brewing, cooking, burn, fuel.
  • Thread Starter
#5  
Researchers still have a long way to go before this is an acceptable fuel for diesel engines. Lack of lubricity is a major problem.

So that is blending a mix of Ethanol AND Diesel? New info to me. THANKS!

The John Deere one above, I think is just straight Ethanol. What they are calling E98 (2% other than Ethanol). As an entire REPLACEMENT for Diesel(s)? Could allow a farm to just redirect part of the crop(s) from sale and do a small Ethanol production on the site -- and not have to truck (and pay) for Diesel fuel to be brought to the site.

Have worked on some conversions for LARGE Diesel Generators. Generally 1 MW and up. Those wind up running on Natural Gas (Methane).
 
/ Ethanol / E100 -- brewing, cooking, burn, fuel.
  • Thread Starter
#6  
I use the coleman stove burning pump regular gas to make maple syrup. I have three of them, and at times there are 5 pots all boiling.

We have made about three gallons of syrup this season. About average....

The coleman stoves have a wide variability of burner performance that depends on the ambient temperature.

Warm fuel works better ;-)

Good points. I did ask for cooking (I was thinking of cooking the mash) -- and you delivered the cooking project and the recipe. Thanks!

My home town had a LOT of maple trees. And the whole community tapped them and we got off early from high school in late Winter (in the hour before sunset or so) to empty all the Sap Bags. Had a community cooker / barn site and the local farmers (Winter, not much else to do) cooked it down to syrup and money went to community activities.

Good Times.
 
/ Ethanol / E100 -- brewing, cooking, burn, fuel. #7  
As a replacement or diesel I understand the challenges. But using pure ethanol in a spark ignition engine is a whole different story. Heck, we are already close with E85. If someone WANTS to run E85 then go for it! But this game of running E10 and E15 only degrades the power and does the driver change their habits/demands? Heck no, they just stick their foot further into the accelerator, using more fuel at a lower MPG.

Someone will bring up octane, yawn. I don't think there has been any problem with increasing octane between the time that lead was removed and ethanol was mandated. MTBE was banned thankfully. 'BTEX complex' works well but there are still some negative health aspects. But just driving a car and crashing it is detrimental too.

BTW, my 2021 F350 is flex fuel compatible. I've never spent a penny on E85. Anybody out there run E85 out of preference?
 
/ Ethanol / E100 -- brewing, cooking, burn, fuel.
  • Thread Starter
#8  
As a replacement or diesel I understand the challenges. But using pure ethanol in a spark ignition engine is a whole different story. Heck, we are already close with E85. If someone WANTS to run E85 then go for it!

Yeah, E100 would be the intentional design intent -- where I am looking at with this.

My application is IF jumping to E100 (or even the lesser E85) it would be as the direct intent.

Not so much trying to be an everything-to-everybody. Since at this point with some basic programmable inputs/outputs an engine (and injectors, etc) can be tuned to most anything, why not intentionally target E100 from the start (or as re-built, then the re-start).

MTBE was banned thankfully.

The choir said Amen.

BTW, my 2021 F350 is flex fuel compatible. I've never spent a penny on E85. Anybody out there run E85 out of preference?

Good Question. Thanks.
 
 
Top