rontaki
Veteran Member
We're going to ban electricity next.I heard the Valero refinery was closing because of insane regulations, leaving only the Phillips 66 refinery. Gas is going to get very expensive in CA, as if it wasn’t already
We're going to ban electricity next.I heard the Valero refinery was closing because of insane regulations, leaving only the Phillips 66 refinery. Gas is going to get very expensive in CA, as if it wasn’t already
No, but I think the federal rebate passed through on one of the cars that we leased. Didn't get any state or local rebates on anything.Did CA or San Diego provide any financial benefit to your purchase of electric vehicles? A CA friend, 15 years ago, went the electric car route because CA incentivized the purchase of electric cars and the PV installed on his property. My memory was 50% of cost for PV was paid by state so it was no thought required as the financial breakeven was less than 5 years.
I'd like to see stats on where that energy is being consumed because Meta is putting in a new data center in our area and their energy burn is going to be insane.
I dunno. Those diesel generators they have in some places (for a one vehicle charging station) look pretty meaningful. Might be 40-50 something KW.I'm guessing EVs are a drop in the bucket compared to modern data centers now that AI is taking off.
Wrong. A Empty pocketbook is the only thing a politician understands.I'll bet the ban does not last long, once the out-of-touch lawmakers find empty shelves and other shortages.
One of the local rebates was utility credit towards home charging station…No, but I think the federal rebate passed through on one of the cars that we leased. Didn't get any state or local rebates on anything.
Yeah we didn't get anything for the electric panel upgrade we did. Would have been nice.One of the local rebates was utility credit towards home charging station…
Another is free charging which is still offered where my niece works plus preferential EV parking.
The biggest perk for busy Bay Area Drivers is single occupant use of the carpool lanes and reduced bridge tolls…
Yeah come back in 10, 20, or 30 years and we should be gradually much further along.I don't buy
That's why I don't put much stock in the "we can't have EV's because our infrastructure can't support them" argument. It sells American ingenuity short. There wasn't a gas station on every corner when cars showed up. I don't believe in government mandates but the buying public wants EVs and I have faith in American enterprise and profit motivation to get the infrastructure in place. I'm especially hopeful that it will create a renewed interest in nuclear power since a lot of the hurdles, especially in waste, have been largely overcome. Of course, we might have to wait for my generation who watched China Syndrome to die off to lower the fear mongering a bit.
You can “delete” a DEF/DPF truck using electronics. You effectively shut off the regen cycle and the DEF fluid injections by using a programmer to reprogram the trucks computer. You can remove the DPF and replace with a piece of exhaust pipe relatively easily.That sounds good but what happens when a new different administration reinstates those strangling regulations.
That was a very intelligent post.Electric vehicles don't work everywhere. Biden was going to use electric postal vehicles until someone found out battery vehicles in freezing climates are not practical. California's ban on diesel vehicles may not come to pass. The semi tractors are about 4,000 to over 8,000 lbs. heavier which would reduce payload by at least 5 -10 percent. Also, all loads from out of state would have to unhitch at the state line and be hooked up to electric motive power. A ridiculous idea to say the least.
California currently generates more solar power than the state can use and pays other states to take it during the day but is short of electricity at night. The current Governor has recently remover 3 or 4 dams which produced electricity; however his excuse was that they did not produce enough electricity. The latest screwball idea is to place floating windmills 900 feet high on platforms of about an acre in size located 30 miles offshore, and anchored to the bottom with chains and weights. in water that is 3,000 -5,000 feet deep then run the wires some 40 -50 miles to a 24 acre battery storage facility which will be built in an area the has tsunami warning signs at that location.
What could possibly go wrong.
This has never been done anywhere in the world in water much deeper that 300 feet. Anything is seawater will be a maintenance nightmare. From my experience as a Naval Officer during a typhoon is that even if you don't believe in God before such an encouter, you will certainly believe in the devil after.
Vehicle emissions have been substantially cleaned up in between the period of your “Eldorado” example, but before the 2008 standards came about.Awesome to say the least. I hope you are old enough to remember sitting in a car, maybe at a light, behind that Eldorado idling in front of you. Wasn't the smell of those fumes the best. Roll back those emission rules and cut off those catalytics.
Sad but true. Unless the US mandated things don't have it. (Not likely). We are too big to ignore, but not so big that mfgs are going to make 2 versions of everything.
You just get a programmer to turn the emissions equipment back on. DPF’s can be replaced with a piece of straight pipe.I would bet my paycheck ot won't happen though. We got 3 years under the current administration and there isn't any telling what will happen after that.
What happens if the next administration goes after those pieces of equipment because they determined it was unlawful to lower the emmision standards![]()
it's funny how the cost always gets back page news.....not just directly to the consumer but the environment as well. fossil fuels are currently the bad guy but what about....(and that sucks because it adds ~$10,000 to the cost of the truck),
I believe that in time and as battery technology improves, many of us will come to the same conclusion. IWithout me asking or asking for more money, my landscaper has mostly switched over to battery electric lawn care equipment. Our city does not mandate it yet but the writing is on the wall.
At my parents' house where I do the yard work, I use three battery tools (mower, trimmer, blower). One battery gets me through the entrie yard and it's a decent size corner lot of about 9,000sq ft (for around here). I have three batteries and three chargers.
On a personal level my wife and I both drive battery EVs and we also have an old truck that's obviously not an EV.
Driving the truck to the gas station and paying $75 for a tank that gets 220 miles is just a terrible experience overall at this point. 220 miles in either EV costs no more than $9.
One of the EVs has enough range for us to drive from San Diego to Las Vegas on one charge.
Every EV owner I talk to feels the same. It's a vastly superior option if you can charge at home and drive less than 150 miles per day on average.
Overall, I'm on board with switching to battery for MY lifestyle right now. It's been great and I have no regrets other than not doing it sooner.
It's come a long way and with more adoption and infrastructure it will be a smarter and smarter choice for more and more people.
There was a time when the public had to cope with phasing out horses when a better solution came along. I'm sure early engines had many downsides compared to the good old reliable equine.
This isn't to say that policy level decisions are always the way to go. Sometimes they have unintended consequences. But there was no policy or law that mandated I switch to EVs, though there were many state and federal efforts to help advance the adoption as there are with many things. The free market gave me the option and I made the decision that I thought was right for me based on what I would like to think was a sound and sensible process.
Circling back to the beginning of my post, I am going to assume that my landscaper made the decision that was best for him as well. That's the way it should be.
For some reason that sentence made me wonder why they haven't started pushing, or mandating, electric powered generators yet.Also, if I lived in an area with the fire problems you are having I'd keep something on hand with a full tank of gas in case I have to bug out in a hurry.
I bought an electric SxS, a Polaris Ranger EV and an electric Zero Turn (Ryobi), got that for a good price used. I do not want to deal with petrol engine maintenance, and the characteristics of the electric motor in the Polaris EV suit the farm tasks much better than a gas engine would. Now, if only batteries didn't cost an arm, a leg and one of the family jewels, electric would be the only way to go.I believe that in time and as battery technology improves, many of us will come to the same conclusion. Ivery rarelynever use my corded drill or circular saw. However, we aren't there yet; nor do we have the infrastructure in place to deliver said power. It's the mandates which I disagree with, as well as funding incentives by taking money out of my pocket (actually, the pockets of your grandchildren.
Also, if I lived in an area with the fire problems you are having I'd keep something on hand with a full tank of gas in case I have to bug out in a hurry.
They are phasing out ice generators…For some reason that sentence made me wonder why they haven't started pushing, or mandating, electric powered generators yet.
After all, it's a dumb enough idea that some politician should've suggested it.
Those are the key words. If it makes sense and you have the option you do what works for you.I went electric in these cases because it made sense to do that.