I’ve never paid for firewood, but in my area (western NY), it’s sold by the face cord. Cherry fetches top buck and sells for double what ash does. It’s worth it, in my opinion. Biggest advantage for me is less frequent ash cleaning required (that must be how ash got its name). Cherry also splits good, and dries in one year. The pretty red color is likely the biggest reason for the high cost though. Rich folks like how it looks stacked up by their fireplaces.
My parents have about 50 acres of woods about 20 miles from our house. When I’m finally thru with the EAB ash (good riddens to it), cherry will make up the majority of the firewood that I make and burn. They also have lots of hard maple, which is similar in all characteristics except color, to the cherry. I’ll be making some of that too, but mostly just storm damage. I’m not rich by any means, but I do like the pretty red color of the cherry wood.I want the most BTU per cord of wood. How much it weighs does not matter because I have no constraints on how much weight I can move or store. I am limited by volume...number of cords.
This is what I found. Numbers are millions of BTU's per cord.
Ash 20
Birch 20
Beech 28
Maple 24
Red Oak 25
Poplar 16
White Pine 14
Other factors like drying time, processing effort, ease of procurement, cost, amount of ash, and rate/duration of burn are considerations. For me, maple and oak are the best choices.
One size does not fit all. What makes sense for me is not likely to be the best choice for you.
In my business, many people I sell to are cost driven. One of my competitors sells ash for $75/face cord ($225/cord). I could charge $85/FC ($255/cord) and offer better value. 14% higher price for 25% more BTUs but many people buy on price. So, I charge $225 as that is what the market price is.