Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality

   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #41  
Max 24 - yes this is what I recall now 10 years later .25% per year - I thought it was 2% but as mentioned in 10 years we have not seen any appreciable drop of generation with the LG 300 Mono panels. These panels were the best you could buy in 2014 and also you are correct if you buy a lower cost panel with a .4 or ,5% per year, just add 2 or 3 more panels.

I wish I had installed 10KW instead of 7.2 KW ($32K vs 26K at the time) as I got a quote in 2020 to increase to 10KW - a new inverter, and 6 panels was $15K - a no go - and if we installed 10KW initially it would have cost $6K more. Hindsight is 20-20, shoulda bought once and been done with it.
The upgrade path is IMO the best reason to go ground-mount, assuming you have room to add additional mounts.

I have a neighbor who looked into upgrading her solar capacity; everything's on the house (roof) right now and there's no room for more panels - so "upgrade" means "replace", and that probably goes for the inverter too. I suppose if you're near the end of life on the panels that's ok, but otherwise it's like saying instead of the 200hp engine in your car you want 300hp and that requiring a new engine completely (instead of a big phat muffler, trust me that's all it needs).

I set up my system so I can "upgrade" it by adding another mount with more panels & inverters and feed that into the existing combiner box (which already has room for the connection); the only "upgrade"="replace" part of it would be swapping a heftier breaker at the service end of the big power cable from the ground mounts (the cable was spec'd for future upgrade at a relatively minimal price increase that was far less than running more/replaced cable).
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality
  • Thread Starter
#42  
OP I think you should try to lower your 2200kw a month useage before you go solar.

I agree with reduction of usage as well - insulation, more efficient heat/air conditioning etc.
Cant really do that. Honestly, I dont understand why people make these statements.....

I use what I use. No more and no less. Are there people who use less kwh than me...sure. Are there people that use more....sure. But what do I cut? Lay in bed at night and not watch TV? Dont cook as much? Rush through a shower instead of enjoy it for 8-10min? Tell my wife and kids they cannot take baths? 2200kwh in the middle of winter in north-central ohio is not bad for an all electric home with 4 people and a full basement.

And whether or not I could reduce winter usage...to even say that of summer down around 1600-1800kwh.....how would that change anything with wanting solar? It wouldnt change the size I want to get....it wouldnt change my payback ROI, and I'd still fall pretty short in winter.
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #43  
@LD1 I hear you. While insulation and a more air tight home are probably desirable long term ideals for reducing energy usage, sometimes the cost / benefit analysis comes out on the side of just installing more solar.

That said, heat pump water heaters and dryers have come a long way.

All the best,

Peter
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #44  
A while back we got an energy audit done on our house which told us what was cost effective to address. They did a blower door test for leaks and used an IR camera to find where the insulation was lacking. It was worth the cost.

We're definitely going with a heat pump water heater in the new house. I'm on the fence about the heat pump clothes dryer- from what I read they're not as much more efficient as the heat pump water heater is, and have some reliability problems.
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality
  • Thread Starter
#45  
While I dont have a heat pump water heater.....I have a pretty efficient setup with a buffer tank and the desuperheater on the geo thermal. My buffer tank usually runs somewhere between 90-110 degrees.

So when I actually do consume hot water.....my regular water heater dont have to go from tap-cold to 130. It only has to go from ~100 to 130
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #46  
Sorry, but I only read the first 15-20post. My system was sized by a distributor of SunPower. They slightly oversized it and it has produced more than I use about 30% of the time. Call your energy company, but I'd be shocked if they true up each month. It's yearly for me and I've never heard otherwise. Keep in mind that the panels will produce less over time. SunPower says 0.5% loss each year. I went with leasing with SunPower, so they guarantee production and send me a check the years the panels don't produce the minimum.
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #47  
Sorry, but I only read the first 15-20post. My system was sized by a distributor of SunPower. They slightly oversized it and it has produced more than I use about 30% of the time. Call your energy company, but I'd be shocked if they true up each month. It's yearly for me and I've never heard otherwise. Keep in mind that the panels will produce less over time. SunPower says 0.5% loss each year. I went with leasing with SunPower, so they guarantee production and send me a check the years the panels don't produce the minimum.
Many, and an increasing number of utilities true up each month. Older tariffs were generally set up around an annual true up, but utilities realized that annual accounting gave them a more expensive cost/kWh and are being phased out.

E.g. In California, the original net energy metering (NEM) tariff was done on an annual kWh accounting basis, with no regard to generation time of year, or time of day that the electricity was used or generated. NEM2 required time of day accounting on a time of use tariff (TOU) that accounts annually for all usage and generation by the time of day, off peak, mid-peak, and peak rates. The current NEM only credits at the underlying generation cost ($0.02/kWh)and charges the solar customer for the transmission and maintenance costs (that can be $0.3-0.5/kwh), so a customer would need to be an enormous annual net generator to net their bill to zero (and that much overproduction is disallowed by the utility). Locales that follow the national building codes generally require an electrical meter and connection for occupancy.

As far as I can tell, nationally most utilities are heading towards a NEM3 type of tariff as this aligns better with the actual costs of production.

Pricing transmission, administration, and maintenance costs is really a monthly meter fee, but most places aren't there yet. It is rather like looking ahead to what replaces a fuel tax if a significant fraction of vehicles aren't gasoline or diesel powered.

All the best,

Peter
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality
  • Thread Starter
#48  
Sorry, but I only read the first 15-20post. My system was sized by a distributor of SunPower. They slightly oversized it and it has produced more than I use about 30% of the time. Call your energy company, but I'd be shocked if they true up each month. It's yearly for me and I've never heard otherwise. Keep in mind that the panels will produce less over time. SunPower says 0.5% loss each year. I went with leasing with SunPower, so they guarantee production and send me a check the years the panels don't produce the minimum.
It would have benefited you to read beyond the first 15-20 posts.

Because monthly is EXACTLY how my power company does it.

But that's irrelevant. I was seeking information about system sizes....vs actual production. Which you provide neither. Only a recommendation to call my power company....which I have several times....because you dont believe the facts as they are. Thanks.
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #49  
It would have benefited you to read beyond the first 15-20 posts.

Because monthly is EXACTLY how my power company does it.

But that's irrelevant. I was seeking information about system sizes....vs actual production. Which you provide neither. Only a recommendation to call my power company....which I have several times....because you dont believe the facts as they are. Thanks.
If I didn't supply the information that was useful enough for you, the mature thing would have just ignored. The information that I supplied was regarding that for the system I had installed, they GAURENTEED a certain amount of production. Most years they failed to meet this production and that is with them knowing that they'd have to pay me if they didn't meet it. It also notes that production will decrease over time. I was attempting to be helpful so you understand this company over promised. I would expect a company that wasn't financially on the hook for a minimum amount to be off even more.

For anyone to give you their system size and actual production is not useful. Before sizing, the company has to come out and take measurements. Your latitude, angle on installation, and clearance all come into play. Sorry that you were unable to obtain that from what I wrote.
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality
  • Thread Starter
#50  
If I didn't supply the information that was useful enough for you, the mature thing would have just ignored. The information that I supplied was regarding that for the system I had installed, they GAURENTEED a certain amount of production. Most years they failed to meet this production and that is with them knowing that they'd have to pay me if they didn't meet it. It also notes that production will decrease over time. I was attempting to be helpful so you understand this company over promised. I would expect a company that wasn't financially on the hook for a minimum amount to be off even more.

For anyone to give you their system size and actual production is not useful. Before sizing, the company has to come out and take measurements. Your latitude, angle on installation, and clearance all come into play. Sorry that you were unable to obtain that from what I wrote.
I dont care that you leased or with that company. I am doing neither.

And yes....your system size, actual production, and location would be extremely helpful. Because that is real-world data and not a MFG's claim.

And simply put...that is the question that I have asked, and the purpose of this thread that you have replied to now TWICE, and given nothing at all useful.

If you dont want to post you location, system size, and production numbers.....then why post?
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #51  
NortracNY - we on TBN analyze stuff (to death sometimes) and make decisions based on facts and real world user experience - initial cost, ROI, quality, maintenance etc. Then typically use spreadsheets and input these variables to look at all the options and costs and benefits associated

So the more information gathered from the community of like or similar applications, or issues is invaluable when one is buying, acquiring or just trying to fix something that is broken.

Granted there are opinions too - why we did x or y, or buy x brand, but most of us are aware enough to read beyond that.
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #52  
Sorry, I'm an engineer. I'll pass since you're ignoring site assessment and the information I tried to help with was so well received. Best of luck.
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #53  
Sorry, I'm an engineer. I'll pass since you're ignoring site assessment and the information I tried to help with was so well received. Best of luck.

You mean this "information"?

Sorry, but I only read the first 15-20post. My system was sized by a distributor of SunPower. They slightly oversized it and it has produced more than I use about 30% of the time. Call your energy company, but I'd be shocked if they true up each month. It's yearly for me and I've never heard otherwise. Keep in mind that the panels will produce less over time. SunPower says 0.5% loss each year. I went with leasing with SunPower, so they guarantee production and send me a check the years the panels don't produce the minimum.

Let's see all the helpful information...
  • "only read the first 15-20post" [sic] -- ok, so you're probably missing a lot of context. Glad you're willing to spend a minute to help
  • "My system was sized by a distributor of SunPower" -- this contains zero useful information
  • "they slightly oversized it" -- what are the parameters which went into this "slightly oversized"? what was the usage, what was the desired output, what panels & inverters were used that make it "slightly oversized"? -- information not provided, useless
  • "has produced more than I use about 30% of the time" -- again, what size (panels & inverters) is it, and how much do you use that it produces more "about 30% of the time"? is that 30% of the time like the peak sun days in the summer, or what -- no useful information
Glad you're an engineer, but I hope I don't use anything that's made to a spec you've written if this is what you consider "useful information".

Facts and figures, buddy. Not vague notions.
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #54  
deleted
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality
  • Thread Starter
#55  
You mean this "information"?



Let's see all the helpful information...
  • "only read the first 15-20post" [sic] -- ok, so you're probably missing a lot of context. Glad you're willing to spend a minute to help
  • "My system was sized by a distributor of SunPower" -- this contains zero useful information
  • "they slightly oversized it" -- what are the parameters which went into this "slightly oversized"? what was the usage, what was the desired output, what panels & inverters were used that make it "slightly oversized"? -- information not provided, useless
  • "has produced more than I use about 30% of the time" -- again, what size (panels & inverters) is it, and how much do you use that it produces more "about 30% of the time"? is that 30% of the time like the peak sun days in the summer, or what -- no useful information
Glad you're an engineer, but I hope I don't use anything that's made to a spec you've written if this is what you consider "useful information".

Facts and figures, buddy. Not vague notions.
Thank you. You beat me to it.

I though it was just me being cranky as I get older.....but I guess it wasnt just me.

Must be some huge secret to his system, size, usage, production, etc??? Either that....or as an engineer he is totally clueless about any of it. Which is the direction I am leaning since he didnt size his own system, and doesnt even own it (lease). So there really is nothing useful he is capable of adding to this post
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #56  
Hi LD,

December 2014 Installed 24 LG Mono Panels 300 W with Solar Edge inverters for 7,2KW
Garage Roof Mount – 38* angle, 190* south facing, Latitude 42*
Cost installed $26K, State credit $4000 Federal Credit $8500 net cost $13,500
ROI was 8.5 years – electric cost .18 KWH when we installed then rose to .22 then to .33 last year. We are grandfathered into true net metering where they pay us for excess at the same price we pay for electricity so if we over generate they send us a check that month.
Annual use – 10-11,000 KWH vs annual generation 8100-8600 KWH average
Q1 – 15-1800 KWH
Q2 2700 KWN
Q3 2600 KWH
Q4 15-1800 KWH
The lowest generation months are December, January and February mostly due to sun angle and snow, but they shed snow pretty fast.
View attachment 879587

I like your idea for doing the tilting ground mount, and really I think you need to keep it simple with one adjustment for summer and one for winter – makes it easier?
Also you should factor in some increase in electricity rates – they never go down, and then the cost for delivery (poles lines etc) is going up everywhere.
I have 3 arrays on tilting ground mounts and changing the the tilt is a minute per array… a single bolt to pull and move to the next slot.

15 years now with 160 W panels and a SunnyBoy inverter.

Each year I receive a small check around $300 at true up for my 6kW system although with new increased monthly charges approved who is to say?
 

Attachments

  • A248F38F-77BC-44EE-AA8B-099DAC012A38.jpeg
    A248F38F-77BC-44EE-AA8B-099DAC012A38.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 100
Last edited:
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #57  
I don't understand much of the solar panel jargon but I do know that the $30K investment it would cost for panels and installation, with the panel having to be installed 500 ft from the house, just didn't make financial sense.
If Texas had a generous solar program to subsidize most of the cost I would consider it. Also my electric company doesn't work with solar generation.
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality #58  
I don't understand much of the solar panel jargon but I do know that the $30K investment it would cost for panels and installation, with the panel having to be installed 500 ft from the house, just didn't make financial sense.
If Texas had a generous solar program to subsidize most of the cost I would consider it. Also my electric company doesn't work with solar generation.
I think that's pretty normal.

I ran numbers for solar off and on for a decade or so before the factors aligned to make it reasonable.

Solar go /no go decisions are very, very local in my experience. Shade, wire costs, installation costs, rebates, and the extent of net metering have significant effects on the return on investment.

Different strokes for different folks...

I have found PVWatts and excel to be very helpful.

All the best,

Peter
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality
  • Thread Starter
#59  
I have 3 arrays on tilting ground mounts and changing the the tilt is a minute per array… a single bolt to pull and move to the next slot.

15 years now with 160 W panels and a SunnyBoy inverter.

Each year I receive a small check around $300 at true up for my 6kW system although with new increased monthly charges approved who is to say?
What are those mounts/racking

Right now thats what I am analyzing. I am leaning toward eg4 brightmount


They seem pretty cheap (affordabe) way to mount 4 panels at a time. I just gotta do concrete piers. And they offer limited adjustment 25-30-35 angles.

Watched alot of videos and read some reviews on them....and people seem to like em, but they arent UL listed and as with most cheap stuff, it comes from china. But I literally cannot come up with any other solution remotely close to being able to mount 20 500w panels for ~$1200

All the other racking I am looking at quite pricey and usually not even adjustable.

With the EG4 I can auger holes and do concrete. Concrete would be the only added expense.

One vendor I was communicating with was suggesting integra-rack IR35....but even it seems pricey.
 
   / Solar production. Panel ratings/claim vs reality
  • Thread Starter
#60  
I think that's pretty normal.

I ran numbers for solar off and on for a decade or so before the factors aligned to make it reasonable.

Solar go /no go decisions are very, very local in my experience. Shade, wire costs, installation costs, rebates, and the extent of net metering have significant effects on the return on investment.

Different strokes for different folks...

I have found PVWatts and excel to be very helpful.

All the best,

Peter
BAsically same thing I have done over the last 10 years. About once every 2-3 years I get a renewed interest in solar, start crunching numbers, communicating with electric company, and pricing materials. Never could pencil out to better than a ~20yr payback.

Equipment getting cheaper, panels getting cheaper and better, rates going up, and my power company doing a more favorable net metering plan have aligned everything for sub 10-year ROI
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

WOOD GRABBER FOR MINI EXCAVATOR (A58214)
WOOD GRABBER FOR...
2018 GENIE GTH1056 TELESCOPIC FORKLIFT (A60429)
2018 GENIE GTH1056...
John Deere 5075E (A53317)
John Deere 5075E...
DEUTZ MARATHON 60KW GENERATOR (A58214)
DEUTZ MARATHON...
2015 VERMEER PD10 PILE DRIVER (A60429)
2015 VERMEER PD10...
2023 Kubota LX2610SUHSD MFWD Compact Tractor with LA535 Front Loader (A56438)
2023 Kubota...
 
Top