Questions on TYM T474 operator platform

aesanders · Oct 20, 2023

I have been out checking out the TYM‘s lately and really like the T474 model. It’s size would be ideal for me and it seems to have the most bang for the buck of just about anything around. And they have some good deals on them right now.

However, the operator platform, especially feet room just seems small for the size of tractor it is. My little 2 series Deere 2320 has more footroom, and I can stretch my feet out a bit, and the foot controls are at a more stretched out angle allowing much easier operation. Was thinking of getting a shuttle shift and I had a hard time lifting my left leg up high enough to reach the clutch in the TYM. Now I am a rather large fellow in girth, not so much in height, so my belly is in the way with the short legroom of the TYM, so it maybe just an issue with fat guys. But I am not the only fat guy around that would consider this tractor. QUESTION: I did see in a YouTube video that there is an extra bolt pattern in the seat and you can move the whole seat back a couple inches. Has anyone done this? Does it make much difference? It’s almost a deal breaker as is, and I would have the dealer move it back to try before I made a decision, but wanted to run this by the smart folks here first.

Also, one other complaint on this tractor is the three point hitch control. It just comes across as cheesy. To small and almost hidden under the seat. No set adjustment either to stop it at say position three (and the numbering doesn’t follow the control lever anyway). Anyone have complaint or issues with this lever? It is one of the more important tractor controls and seems like an after thought on this model. Might not be an issue in actual use, but I don’t like it and if feels like cost cutting.

Any other things I should check out on this tractor for those that have it?

CloverKnollFarms · Oct 20, 2023

I liked the 494 platform a lot better. Or you could try the 4820?

aesanders · Oct 21, 2023

CloverKnollFarms said:
I liked the 494 platform a lot better. Or you could try the 4820?

I like these two platforms better also, just the physical size is slightly larger than I was hoping to get. have lots of tight areas on the property. The 4820 maybe the ticket though, as it is slightly more compact than the 494.

Still, like the 474 best if the seat move back opens up the operator station. I guess no one has done that?

CloverKnollFarms · Oct 21, 2023

Yes, the 4820 is a heavy weight, smaller footprint 494… but the 494 platform is like a family room

stoyan79 · Oct 21, 2023

474 is a winner, 494/574 have some issues, the old Branson models (4820/5520) are proven and generally built heavier.

Torvy · Oct 21, 2023

stoyan79 said:
474 is a winner, 494/574 have some issues, the old Branson models (4820/5520) are proven and generally built heavier.

The 494/574 don't have "issues". They are arguably the most tractor for the money right now. You will find anecdotal evidence of any model from any brand have problems, but there is no evidence at all of a fundamental problem with the 494/574. (They are also heavier than their Branson cousins).

CloverKnollFarms · Oct 21, 2023

I'll admit, the 494 has a larger frame... The 4820 is much more compact, and only weighs 40 pounds less. The operators weight will vary by more than 40lbs

aesanders · Oct 22, 2023

Does the 4820 cab model use the same controls as the 494? Kind of Frankenstein appearance. Was looking at the 15 series cab models, and they have the 474 Contols in the cab. Weird.

K5lwq · Oct 22, 2023

aesanders said:
Does the 4820 cab model use the same controls as the 494? Kind of Frankenstein appearance. Was looking at the 15 series cab models, and they have the 474 Contols in the cab. Weird.

I am not sure what you do not like on the controls but they are similar to the 15 series. Maybe I am just use to mine but the controls do not bother me.

The 4820 has one feature that is very nice. It has 4 range gears and it is synchronized. Shifts very easily unlike the 15 series. I suggest test driving it though to make sure it works for you.

aesanders · Oct 22, 2023

In reply to K5lwq, I haven’t been in a 15 series cab, as i haven’t seen one at a dealer, so not sure how much is different. One thing that had me really disappointed looking at pics though was the location of the fuel tank. I love the location on the Rops model under the step. It is moved to the back just like the 474 on the cab model. Not sure if the pedal controls on the 15 series cab model are the same as the 474 though. They are tight for me in the 474, although have not been in one with the seat bolted in the far back position.

K5lwq · Oct 22, 2023

The 20 series definitely has more room than the 15 series. I am taller but not too thick so I do ok in my 4815C. Another thing to consider is I was told they stopped producing the shuttle in the 15 series and offer only HST. May produce it again next year as they have had issues with the clutch rod breaking and need to redesign the linkage.

I could see a bigger guy not liking the rear remote levers. They are tight against the seat in the 15 series. I have not been in the TYM legacy versions so can’t offer any comparison there.

aesanders · Oct 22, 2023

That 4820c is looking really nice. Stoyan, you have any more pictures of your new rig? I am still deciding upon rops vs cab. Was always thinking of a rops model, but the cab has recently been on my brain. Have had cab tractors when I lived in colder climates. The heat never bothered me much, but I am not getting any younger and eliminating the dust would be really nice to boot.

Texasmark · Oct 23, 2023

aesanders said:
I have been out checking out the TYM‘s lately and really like the T474 model. It’s size would be ideal for me and it seems to have the most bang for the buck of just about anything around. And they have some good deals on them right now.

However, the operator platform, especially feet room just seems small for the size of tractor it is. My little 2 series Deere 2320 has more footroom, and I can stretch my feet out a bit, and the foot controls are at a more stretched out angle allowing much easier operation. Was thinking of getting a shuttle shift and I had a hard time lifting my left leg up high enough to reach the clutch in the TYM. Now I am a rather large fellow in girth, not so much in height, so my belly is in the way with the short legroom of the TYM, so it maybe just an issue with fat guys. But I am not the only fat guy around that would consider this tractor. QUESTION: I did see in a YouTube video that there is an extra bolt pattern in the seat and you can move the whole seat back a couple inches. Has anyone done this? Does it make much difference? It’s almost a deal breaker as is, and I would have the dealer move it back to try before I made a decision, but wanted to run this by the smart folks here first.

Also, one other complaint on this tractor is the three point hitch control. It just comes across as cheesy. To small and almost hidden under the seat. No set adjustment either to stop it at say position three (and the numbering doesn’t follow the control lever anyway). Anyone have complaint or issues with this lever? It is one of the more important tractor controls and seems like an after thought on this model. Might not be an issue in actual use, but I don’t like it and if feels like cost cutting.

Any other things I should check out on this tractor for those that have it?

My neighbor has one with the cab. He is over 6' tall and muscular build. He seems to fold up inside and has never complained. I find the operator's station with the cab has more room than my Branson 6530.....especially head room for my 6'4" frame having sat in the seat and checked things out when I was helping him one day.

Slowpoke Slim · Oct 24, 2023

The 25 series Branson (mine) shares the same cab as the late model 20 series. The early 20 series had a smaller cab, and I think some of the A/C stuff intruded into the front area of the ceiling? That was changed in the late model cab and the interior ceiling has more clearance now. I think I sat in one with a cab like yours once Texasmark, and yeah, it seemed easy to smack your forehead on the "hump" that stuck down (I'm 6'1").

I don't think any of the now "legacy" TYM cabs have that hump in there anymore.

TractorTYMe · Oct 24, 2023

If you're a big fella, I'd recommend the T494/574 or the 5520 for ya if your $$$ can stretch to that size? It will be worth it and no regrets to have proper size accomodation. For me the T474 is fine as I'm only 5'7''.

aesanders · Oct 25, 2023

Was out looking at the RK version of the 474 (RK 37) yesterday, and I think the cab will be fine if I move the seat back two inches to the furthest bolt pattern. Maybe will raise the seat also. The cab itself is quite roomy, no issues there. Just feet room and the 90 degrees knee bend. Knees are to close to the steering column as is. With the seat back and possibly raised, it should be quite comfortable. I do think they need to put some bigger springs in the seat bottom for big Americans though.

ptsg · Oct 25, 2023

Don't know what seat TYM uses but on the Branson models you can adjust the tensions on the springs of the seat. There is also a small knob that limits how high the seat raises.

Torvy · Oct 25, 2023

TractorTYMe said:
If you're a big fella, I'd recommend the T494/574 or the 5520 for ya if your $$$ can stretch to that size? It will be worth it and no regrets to have proper size accomodation. For me the T474 is fine as I'm only 5'7''.

I'm 6'1, 230-260 depending on how well I stick to my diet.

The 574 has plenty of room for me and then some.

"Was out looking at the RK version of the 474 (RK 37)"

The RK37 is a T394, not a T474.