two_bit_score
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 12,444
- Tractor
- John Deere 110 TLB, Diamond C 19LPX GN trailer
I put AGCO on my watch list:Same thing happened to AGCO tractors. They were virtually identical to Massey & Challenger, too.
I put AGCO on my watch list:Same thing happened to AGCO tractors. They were virtually identical to Massey & Challenger, too.
Is that because of inflation or because its value went up.You have a tractor, if you kept it nice, that would re-sell for more than you paid for it if you bought it 30 yrs ago.
The difficulty for dealers taking machines as trade-ins has relatively little to do with brand affiliation and everything to do with the change in interest rates over the last 18 months. Everything on the dealers' lots is financed either by bank loans to the dealer or by the manufacturers themselves.
The local and regional banks do the vast majority of lending to equipment dealerships. Those banks have been put under tremendous pressure to hold on to liquidity due to the rise in interest rates. The banks' loan portfolios are heavily tied up in long term loans made over the last 15 years at very low rates.
Those low rate loans from years past are now underwater even if the loans are 'performing' (ie the borrower keeps making payments). As a consequence the banks can't accept any more risk from the dealers.
The dealers themselves have seen their cost of financing inventory rise ~5-10 fold, and what was previously a minor issue is a much larger concern. Their cost of holding used inventory is also likely quite a bit higher for used equipment than it is for new equipment.
The manufacturers are in maybe worse shape. I haven't looked in a few years, but last I checked big green had in excess of 30 billion dollars in equipment finance on their books. All that financing was almost certainly lower than the interest costs on new bond issues. That means big green is now subsidizing the borrowing costs of their previous sales.
I expect any kind of trade in will get hard be accepted over the next year or two. The bright side is there will be some screaming deals for those with cold hard cash to come in and scoop up. Caveat emptor.
Wait a minute. You work at farming, machining, AND at a Kubota dealership part time....and now at Ford as well?I equate new car salesmen (and women) to door to door vacuum cleaner sales people, IOW, not much. When we are looking at a new vehicle, we shop on Sunday so no idiots to bother us. We decide what we want and go back on Monday and skip all the BS and buy it. Of course being Fords family, we always get the employee price and no BS.
The bit about how even a well-serviced loan from previous financing can become a burden when compared to newer bond issues is very perceptive and unappreciated.....or maybe that's just my own bias because I agree with that way of looking at it.SNIP...
The manufacturers are in maybe worse shape. I haven't looked in a few years, but last I checked big green had in excess of 30 billion dollars in equipment finance on their books. All that financing was almost certainly lower than the interest costs on new bond issues. That means big green is now subsidizing the borrowing costs of their previous sales.
I expect any kind of trade in will get hard be accepted over the next year or two. The bright side is there will be some screaming deals for those with cold hard cash to come in and scoop up. Caveat emptor.
No, I mean right now. That model was produced from 87-97.Is that because of inflation or because its value went up.
In 30 years itll be 60 years old
that would be a push bar lolSomebody saws off the drawbar.![]()