DonaldP
Gold Member
They work great and I can usually be found at about 28 to 35 degrees if the wind is very stiff in my particular sailboat.
But… that’s where a gauge like this stops being a reality.
The only way to know at what point my sailing rig will roll is to roll it, or …at least get it to the point where you are hanging onto something more solidly connected to the boat than the person next to you
So yes I agree that the only way to know is to either get it close or get it to the point where you are uncomfortable going any further and then mark that on the guage, in the position the Gauge is in when you test it.
I was thinking about an actual test using a support like an automotive lift in a garage with something against the loader vertical support brackets to support the tractor at a point where it might begin to tilt over (using a floor Jack) but with the car lift to prevent full rolling of the equipment, or only a minimal amount of roll to not damage the equipment.
With the increased use of cabs today, that resistance to roll will decrease with the change in the center of gravity of the equipment (CG).
With all of this there are also “dry weight” considerations versus “live weight”.
Dry weight being with no additional gear in the tractor whatsoever compared to live weight being with chains, tools, add-ons to the cab or other material.
Don’t forget that with quick attach loaders being a major use option today, it’s very easy to change the CG of any piece of equipment either higher or lower very easily without the operator understanding the possible consequences. That’s just with the attachment change, but one can’t disregard the height of that attachment (either front or rear attachment). That one single variable will have more on the impact of the CG than anything else period.
So even given full disclosure of the CG for a given piece of equipment, from the factory, the roll over effects will still be challenging to calculate for any given tractor based on everything … including the weight and height of the occupant(s)
A daunting task for sure, but like me, if you’re inquisitive and have a desire to protect yourself from a general rollover sItuation, then an attempt to give yourself the maximum amount of angle you might want to visit is better than having no idea where the break point is until it happens!
I forgot to mention that CG also has a forward and aft component, with the tilt ot rollover subject to a variable of weight forward or aft of a horizontal line… not just vertical.
Add that to your equation and it gets very messy very quickly.
Let’s say you have a 1200 lbs mower of ballast on the 3 point, at 6” high. And you have little or no ballast or implements on the front.
If you get into a situation where the tractor could tilt (roll), then the rear end will have a lower center of gravity than the front end, causing the front to attempt to“roll” or lift the front end, and then depending on the distance away from the total CG of the tractor (in both directions) then the unit may only lift a front tire at that angle.
But if the mower were at transport height or say 2 ft, then there is less distance to the rear ballast due to the pivoting ballast closer to the center or CL of the tractor weight to the total tractor CG, and the entire unit could roll Vs just picking up a front tire…. Lots of variables !!!
Last edited:
