First, have to laugh about the comment at the top of the article about supporting local journalism. This wasn't journalism, THIS is a prime example of a news article creating for shock value and creating hysteria IMO.
NO WHERE in the article posted does it state what this woman died of, only that she tested for the virus and died before getting the results. Apologies, is the dead womans boyfried in the medical profession and does he know what she died of? He's (the boyfriend) is making an assumption.
Is there a chance she could of gotten it? Yes. Is there a chance that she could of NOT had it? Yes. Is there a chance that this woman had another condition that increased the odds that she was at a higher risk for whatever reason that "accelerated" her death? Yes. However, none of this was addressed in the article.
Is this virus an automatic death sentence to anyone who has it? By far, no. However, that does not mean that if you show any signs of a symptoms per this virus, that does NOT mean you shouldn't get yourself checked out ASAP.
Do I belive this virus is a issue? Heck yes.
If ANYONE is running a high temerature, you should go get yourself checked out ASAP. This woman (39 year old in the article) had that chance and passed on it because she thought she was low risk (news flash, 39 really isn't that young). If she were 20, I could understand her line of reasoning. We are running more precautions even in our own home because my 88 year old father living with us.