Anyone using a hydraulic front blade in areas with 120 or more of snow

[oosik]

Lordy - I would consider nothing less than a blower if I had 120" of snow. Do we all understand how much that is - - TEN DAM FEET. Put a good blower on the 3-point. I have a mile long gravel driveway. When I had my original tractor - Ford 1700 - I had a 3-point blower. Yes - it was a pain in the neck/shoulders. But it did a great job of keeping the driveway, yard & mailbox area clear & clean.

My 2009 Kubota M6040 with its heavy duty Rhino 950 rear blade is what I use now.

I see no way that you could possibly clear that much snow with either a front or rear blade.

 

[Reb954]

I Visited the New Holland dealer on a whim. He is a bit far away but wanted to check out a Boomer.

Told him I need to clear snow but I cannot drive backward and the front blowers have issues with ground clearance if I leave the sub frame on.

He suggested using a SSQA hydraulic blade. Easy on and off...not expensive...and snow banks can be pushed up and pushed back.

I have about 300 yards of driveway, and 1/4 acre of open area to clear.

Anyone in high snow ares tried this?

Any thoughts?

PS: 120 inches or more of snow

My situation is similar to yours. I don't see any reason you couldn't use the blade. The question is more, do you have enough room to push the snow in to and how much time do you have to push it?

The area I clear is about the same as yours and it takes me about an hour to clear it all. I have the FEL with bucket and a snowblower on the back. I clean up around the house and driveway with the FEL, then use the blower to clean the path to and in front of the barn.

 

[nybirdman]

That's 120 inches over an 8 month period;not that big of a deal.Not like down-state NY where they get up to 400 inches and may 3-4' dumps.I do four drives and my woods road(1/4 mile) plus parking areas with a FEL mounted plow/back blade.

 

[MossRoad]

Lordy - I would consider nothing less than a blower if I had 120" of snow. Do we all understand how much that is - - TEN DAM FEET. Put a good blower on the 3-point. I have a mile long gravel driveway. When I had my original tractor - Ford 1700 - I had a 3-point blower. Yes - it was a pain in the neck/shoulders. But it did a great job of keeping the driveway, yard & mailbox area clear & clean.

My 2009 Kubota M6040 with its heavy duty Rhino 950 rear blade is what I use now.

I see no way that you could possibly clear that much snow with either a front or rear blade.

It's not 10' at once! He said it's about 6" at a time. :laughing:

 

[MossRoad]

A SSQA blade isnt that different than a truck plow in most respects. So if a truck currently gets the job done a SSQA probably will as well.

Most SSQA plows dont have float. I'm about to rebuild my SSQA plow frame to put float on it. Float on the loader arms doesnt work as it puts to much weight on the plow. No different than digging with a bucket in float. Plowing mud & gravel is as big issue for me, but was an issue with my old L3200 with a home built plow that had float as well. I was somewhat expecting to have to build float into my new plow when I got it.

Tractors have a lot less power & speed than a truck. Snow doesnt curl off to the side as far. My L4060 does fine in a foot of snow or up to 2' of light snow. Things melt off fast in Colorado so berms on the side arent an issue.

With a SSQA plow you can grab drifts & back drag a few feet at a time. Probably about as efficient as using a bucket. The photos below show progress I made using this technique on heavy packed drifts from the bomb cyclone in Colorado last week. That light bar belongs to a F350 with over a 12" lift & matching tires.

View attachment 596845View attachment 596846View attachment 596847

That's why gauge wheels are so nice on a plow. You CAN put the loader in float and the plow won't touch the drive and won't dig in.

 

[Fallon]

That's why gauge wheels are so nice on a plow. You CAN put the loader in float and the plow won't touch the drive and won't dig in.

Gauge wheels may be better than shoes, but not enough. We get a lot of freeze that cycles here & that means mud. Lots of soft ground & mud. Setting my shoes an inch below the blade is sometimes not enough to stop from plowing mud.

The extra weight of the whole loader driving the plow into the ground sinks the shoes & plow. My old plow on the old tractor had float on the mount. Because of that & the light weight of the plow it did a bit better at not plowing mud than my current plow, even without shoes. The light weight meant it wasnt nearly as good cutting drifts or scraping things clean though. It's all tradeoffs. It was also further out than my new plow so would push the machine sideways harder.

 

[npalen]

I could see where spring loaded down force would be helpful on an FEL snow blade. It would be similar to a chain lift for float but could apply some down pressure as needed when trying to "skin the pavement" for example.

I like the idea of gauge wheels on the FEL SSQA but wondering what happens when the blade is angled sideways. I assume they would just skid sideways if not caster mounted?

Also wondering what happens when the blade is angled and then also tilted front to back to control cutting depth. Is there enough slack in the system that the gauge wheels continue to control gouging of the leading or trailing end of the blade?

 

[MossRoad]

I could see where spring loaded down force would be helpful on an FEL snow blade. It would be similar to a chain lift for float but could apply some down pressure as needed when trying to "skin the pavement" for example.

I like the idea of gauge wheels on the FEL SSQA but wondering what happens when the blade is angled sideways. I assume they would just skid sideways if not caster mounted?

Also wondering what happens when the blade is angled and then also tilted front to back to control cutting depth. Is there enough slack in the system that the gauge wheels continue to control gouging of the leading or trailing end of the blade?

My gauge wheels are casters on the back of the blade. My power angle cylinder is right behind the blade, parallel to the blade. My blade is probably less than a foot from my QA mount.

Here's a picture from 2001.

 

[shooterdon]

My gauge wheels are casters on the back of the blade. My power angle cylinder is right behind the blade, parallel to the blade. My blade is probably less than a foot from my QA mount.

Here's a picture from 2001.

View attachment 596956

Good picture!!!

If the casters are mounted on the QA plate, they are behind the angling cylinders. I think that addresses the point in npalen's post about angling the blade. Curling the blade to adjust cutting action is moot...cannot do that with a truck plow and it works...but if the blade is curled down, the casters will be higher than the blade anyway.

 

[LouNY]

My front SSQA blade has shoes on it, quite often I will trim the dump/curl position to adjust the relationship of the shoes to the cutting edge.
I have a truck with a plow but I use the tractor with the front and or rear blade.
I plow slow most of the time as my driveway tends to get ruts and large rocks sticking up just above the roadway.
When the driveway is frozen hard and smooth both blades will work well and I have used both at the same time to get a wider swath.
This winter the driveway thawed and got a lot of ruts then froze, the front blade was jumping and shuddering and bouncing on the trip springs.
I could reduce that by shortening the shoes and rolling the blade back to change the blades angle of attack but it still caught quite often.
I mainly used the back blade this winter, pulling it forward then pushing the banks back with the front blade and across the road.
And pushing into the piles that I have in a few spots that get pushed straight out.

Also curling the blade is similar to using the different mounting holes on many truck mounts to change the attack angle.