New truck #@$%@#&

/ New truck #@$%@#& #241  
IMO the Ecobullchit Powerstroke or whatever it's called will turn out to be a POS much like the Rams Fiat diesel. At the same the GM straight 6 Duramax will be a excellent motor. Both of these opinions will apply for both stock and modified motors IMO.

Maybe someone should make a V6 turbo-diesel for a tractor..... Oh wait that would be really stupid which is probably why noone does it.
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #243  
Well fellas if you wanting to learn more about the eco-boost, F-1fiddy power stroke or the super duty lurk over here:
Ford Truck Enthusiasts News - Ford-Trucks.com

If you want to learn about any issues with eco-boost this guy has a informative channel:

FordTechMakuloco
- YouTube


This guy does a good job of explaining issues and has good camera work.

I was happy to get the 2018 Super Duty with the 6.2L for about 47k. XLT premium with camper package. Do not tow heavy and often enough to warrant the 6.7L .
The specs are so close to my old power Stroke 7.3L that it just gives me a big grin each time I crank it up and drive it!
Oh and 7.2k pulls make you look in the mirror to make you're hooked up to a load. Nice... :D:cool2:
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #245  
There are very few repair issues that require cab removal on the 6.7L. The 6.7L is actually pretty service friendly.
Cool. I thought so.

I'm still haunted by 6.0 and 6.4 nightmares. It's been 13 years since I was a tech. And 10 since I was a factory rep.

I remember helping work on one of the new 6.4s. It lost its prime overnight every time. Was a banjo fitting washer. Had to pull cab to change a
.25 cent washer.
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #246  
From everything I've read and heard (from reliable sources...not internet conjecture) the 6.7L was designed by Ford to specifically address not only reliability issues of the 6.0 and 6.4 but ease-of-maintenance issues as well. The down-powered versions of the PSD Ford puts in the 550 and 650 are supposed to go 500,000 miles before any major maintenance is required.

I've been a Duramax fan for the last 10 years or so but I like this latest version of the PSD a lot.

Admittedly, though, I'm pretty easy on my trucks. They're mostly highway driven and don't tow a lot of weight...a trailer with a 4500 pound tractor is about it and that's pretty rare.
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #247  
IMO the Ecobullchit Powerstroke or whatever it's called will turn out to be a POS much like the Rams Fiat diesel. At the same the GM straight 6 Duramax will be a excellent motor. Both of these opinions will apply for both stock and modified motors IMO.

Maybe someone should make a V6 turbo-diesel for a tractor..... Oh wait that would be really stupid which is probably why noone does it.
Opposed-Piston - Achates
Achates engine in Ford F-15 pickup targets 37 mpg, with Saudi oil company backing
47-50% Thermal efficiency was a number many electrical generating plants could not achieve a few years ago.
This engine can run gas or diesel and is about 30% more efficient than current diesels.

Making it drable, cost effective, smooth running, quiet over a wide range of operating conditions, meeting emissions, etc is the challenge.
You can buy this today with enough money. Up to 55% Thermal efficiency, 50% thermal to generator watt output!
Introducing the Fairbanks Morse Trident OP - YouTube
Fairbanks Morse Engine and Achates Power Team Up to Enhance Opposed-Piston Engines
Put it in a really huge Monster truck, Tractor or a large ship/yacht?
 
Last edited:
/ New truck #@$%@#& #248  
From everything I've read and heard (from reliable sources...not internet conjecture) the 6.7L was designed by Ford to specifically address not only reliability issues of the 6.0 and 6.4 but ease-of-maintenance issues as well. The down-powered versions of the PSD Ford puts in the 550 and 650 are supposed to go 500,000 miles before any major maintenance is required.

I've been a Duramax fan for the last 10 years or so but I like this latest version of the PSD a lot.

Admittedly, though, I'm pretty easy on my trucks. They're mostly highway driven and don't tow a lot of weight...a trailer with a 4500 pound tractor is about it and that's pretty rare.

Not a fan of complexity. Ex. EGR coolers and DEF, the first can plug/fail, and DEF freezes, at least up here.

Emissions - not a level playing field...... if engines were assessed based on emissions per mile, diesels probably wouldn't be saddled with anything like what we have for today's complexity. For that matter, modern gasoline engines wouldn't be getting the free pass they do now either.....

A modern pu diesel is fun to drive; not so much fun-to-own once the warranty is up. A lot of fleets stick with gas light-trucks now, where they used to have diesels.

We all need to enjoy our money :thumbsup: before we're gone, but obviously your (edit: current) needs could be met with many modern 1/2 tons.

Rgds, D.
 
Last edited:
/ New truck #@$%@#& #250  
The discussion of "Needs" is one asked through the ages...

I've heard some say they were never more happy as a young struggling couple making their way in a rented studio... or one of my very well off friends spending time in his simple little cabin... saying it has everything he needs...

Marketing is driven by desire... because if you NEED something... the marketing has little value other than getting what you NEED for a better price or convenience.

All of my cars but one have been second hand or older... some basket cases... just never seen the need to buy new for a variety of reasons...

Some of my friends have vowed to NEVER own a modern vehicle out of warranty... and a few this has really served them well because I have seen brand new 70k vehicles leave them stranded...

I have driven a King Ranch Super Duty towing and by far the best tow vehicle I have ever driven... but I just as easily towed with my 91 Silverado and be within weight rating...
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #251  
Some of my friends have vowed to NEVER own a modern vehicle out of warranty... and a few this has really served them well because I have seen brand new 70k vehicles leave them stranded...

I agree with most of your points ID, and we are saying the same thing about money/needs/wants. :)

New(ish) Ford ? My pick would be an F250, 6.2L, pretty much what YLee just bought, 'cept I'd choose XL if ordering.

For me, it's not a diesel (I own 2 old ones) thing, it's a complexity thing..... to ur's point above, most loaded up vehicles are seriously complex, regardless of fuel type..... one of the reasons I stopped by to admire Fuddy's "new" truck :thumbsup:

Rgds, D.
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #252  
IMO the Ecobullchit Powerstroke or whatever it's called will turn out to be a POS much like the Rams Fiat diesel. At the same the GM straight 6 Duramax will be a excellent motor. Both of these opinions will apply for both stock and modified motors IMO.

Maybe someone should make a V6 turbo-diesel for a tractor..... Oh wait that would be really stupid which is probably why noone does it.
I work at a Dodge dealership here. The EcoDiesel does not have that many issues with it. Most common are emission related (as with all other modern diesels), possible timing cover seal starts to leak oil (it's a diesel, quite common regardless of make). The biggest complaint with the EcoDiesel is the expensive oil changes, it requires a 5w40 full synthetic diesel oil (early models required 5w30 synthetic diesel oil). Which is $207. Several people have traded their Ram 1500 EcoDiesels as their contract has expired for oil changes, and they do not want to buy a new contract, nor want to pay for the oil change at the dealership.

One thing that diesel owners refuse to understand is, especially on the Cummins is the oil change calls for and hour and a half. 30 minutes to drain the engine (2 quarts of oil can easily stay in the head and cylinders of you only drain for 10 minutes), fill it with oil, start the engine for a few minutes, then let it sit for 30 minutes to check oil level.

My problem with Ford's 3.0L PowerStroke is, they are using a timing belt instead of chain, which has a 150,000 mile replacement interval. It's always felt timing belts are inferior, I don't care if it's for NVH. The engines are noisy as is, you cannot really hear the difference in noise with a chain drive. I cannot even hear the gear train in a Cummins 5.9 or 6.7, all I hear is the clatter of the engine.
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #253  
I get it about complexity. There's something to be said for the KISS principle. And I did get an XL because it had everything I "need" at a price I was willing to pay. So we're also on the same page there.

My point is complexity isn't necessarily bad just because. As a matter of fact, as I get older, complexity in lots of things makes my life easier. Old military injuries from almost 30 years ago keep me from doing many things I'd like to do so I rely on technology a lot to make life easier.

I didn't mean to come across like I was picking on you or anyone else. Just a friendly conversation about things that are interesting to me because I don't have my **** tractor yet. :mad:
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #254  
I didn't mean to come across like I was picking on you or anyone else. Just a friendly conversation about things that are interesting to me because I don't have my **** tractor yet. :mad:

:) No worries.....we are just using a pile of modern tech to chit chat about older and new truck "stuff", s'all good !

Medical tech advances faster than most areas.....always good to see new innovations that help people with injuries/illnesses.

Rgds, D.
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #255  
I work at a Dodge dealership here. The EcoDiesel does not have that many issues with it. Most common are emission related (as with all other modern diesels), possible timing cover seal starts to leak oil (it's a diesel, quite common regardless of make). The biggest complaint with the EcoDiesel is the expensive oil changes, it requires a 5w40 full synthetic diesel oil (early models required 5w30 synthetic diesel oil). Which is $207. Several people have traded their Ram 1500 EcoDiesels as their contract has expired for oil changes, and they do not want to buy a new contract, nor want to pay for the oil change at the dealership.

One thing that diesel owners refuse to understand is, especially on the Cummins is the oil change calls for and hour and a half. 30 minutes to drain the engine (2 quarts of oil can easily stay in the head and cylinders of you only drain for 10 minutes), fill it with oil, start the engine for a few minutes, then let it sit for 30 minutes to check oil level.

My problem with Ford's 3.0L PowerStroke is, they are using a timing belt instead of chain, which has a 150,000 mile replacement interval. It's always felt timing belts are inferior, I don't care if it's for NVH. The engines are noisy as is, you cannot really hear the difference in noise with a chain drive. I cannot even hear the gear train in a Cummins 5.9 or 6.7, all I hear is the clatter of the engine.

Many people are maintenance adverse. IMO, some of the failures in post-emissions diesels relate to neglected maintenance - diesel folk were used to how much neglect many older diesels would tolerate. Frequent fuel filter changes are MANDATORY on most modern light diesels - that cost adds to the oil change objection.

I'm in the camp If you want to Play, Be prepared to Pay...... don't take on a modern diesel unless you are willing to adhere to ALL the MTCE needs, on-schedule. That's just part of being an informed buyer, no foul on the part of the equipment, IMO.

A lot of people like the fact that they don't have to change fuel filters on many modern gas engined vehicles.... I wish they still had them from the factory.... If I signed on for a modern diesel in my driveway, I'd have no issue with spending the extra coin on routine maintenance, but I can see where many people would....

People being cheap, that's one concern I have (esp. re modern dzl emission systems) buying one used..... many diesels have very specific oil requirements.

Might have been the Benz 3.0L dzl,,, IIRC, they tended to spin the cam gear at higher mileage, but that's not really a complexity issue, just marginal mechanical design.....

Complexity..... look at cylinder de-activation in gas truck engines..... GM had plenty of issues (modern day), Ford stayed out of that game altogether, and Dodge seemed to nail it out-of-the-gate.... tech is great, when it works/stays working/creates no downstream collateral issues......

With you on the Tbelt.... that's one thing I struggled with rationalizing a VW TDI...... a 600k+ km engine, that grew to have seriously expensive Tbelt changes....... starts to cut into the long-life/fuel saving cost advantage.....

Rgds, D.
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #256  
Amazing what old trucks command in the market these days...

Brother has been looking for a 50's something Chevrolet and what a wake up call... either rust buckets or vehicles priced very high...

Nice Barn by the way!
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #257  
Never mind old trucks, look at what used newer pickups are selling for. My CU has a 4 door, 8 foot bed 2012 F350 Superduty for sale right now.
Minimum bid is $17000.

The truck has 252K miles on the clock, and since it's apparently a repo I doubt that the maintenance was kept up to date.
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #258  
View attachment 569373
View attachment 569374
View attachment 569375

That farmer knew he was getting a good truck with your Cheyanne.

Recently got the 54 Chevy out the barn. Frame off full resto in progress. Put a 76 El Camino rear-end in it and will completely rebuild the straight 6 for power.
Abrasive blasted, Acid etched primed, imron on frame and rear-end. All new hubs and disc on the front. Might even put a vintage-air system in it for AC. New bolt kit, and new wiring harness. Put a SS battery box below the cab and master Cyl on the frame.
All told, total restoration of this work horse will cost about 16k. New trucks can't compete. I'll be driving this new old-stock Chevy when most the news ones are long gone.

That will be nice when you get it done. :thumbsup:
 
/ New truck #@$%@#& #259  
I agree with most of your points ID, and we are saying the same thing about money/needs/wants. :)

New(ish) Ford ? My pick would be an F250, 6.2L, pretty much what YLee just bought, 'cept I'd choose XL if ordering.

For me, it's not a diesel (I own 2 old ones) thing, it's a complexity thing..... to ur's point above, most loaded up vehicles are seriously complex, regardless of fuel type..... one of the reasons I stopped by to admire Fuddy's "new" truck :thumbsup:

Rgds, D.

Just saw a STX trim this morning at the Denny's parking lot. with the nice large NAV screen. So tad higher trim with options to add and not pay that hefty lariat trim. :thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
/ New truck #@$%@#&
  • Thread Starter
#260  
I love my '93 f150,300-6...especially now. Bush hogging I saw this huge maple limb broken off down in the spring. It was as big as maple trees in the yard. I went down with logging chains and in 4x4 low pulled it out easily, then uphill to brush pile where I'll cut it for firewood. First gear it's like a walking speed...but never spun. 20180901_164226.jpeg20180823_195827.jpeg
 

Marketplace Items

2016 CATERPILLAR 416F2 BACKHOE (A63276)
2016 CATERPILLAR...
2020 PETERBILT 567 (A58214)
2020 PETERBILT 567...
2015 Peterbilt 389 T/A Wet Kit Day Cab Truck Tractor (A55973)
2015 Peterbilt 389...
500 BBL FRAC TANK (A58214)
500 BBL FRAC TANK...
Lincoln Electric Ranger Welder (A61166)
Lincoln Electric...
2008 MACK CHU613 DAYCAB (INOPERABLE) (A58214)
2008 MACK CHU613...
 
Top