And you CAN use a GFI recep. on a MWBC.
I stand corrected.
True. But, with limitations. No pass through.
And you CAN use a GFI recep. on a MWBC.
Curious how much money such a circuit might save. That's the reason for doing it am I right? Or is there improved function of some kind? Don't see why a KISS circuit couldn't be used why the complexity.
I'm trying to understand the savings in quantitative terms. Maybe $400 materials? And 4 hours of electrician time @ $100/hr? So savings in the range of $1000? Cost of construction @ $100-$150 per sq ft = $200-$300k for a 2000 sq ft home. So a very rough estimate of savings might be 0.5% of the cost of construction? I am thinking of the trade-off between saving the electrician some time and materials up front, against maybe 5 decades of dealing with the somewhat inconvenient and possibly dangerous consequences identified by commenters.
It's like pros that still use 14 ga for 15 amp circuits.
Each circuit needs its own neutral.
Less chance for problems if every circuit has it's own neutral. No shared neutral circuits. BTW, almost all circuits are designed to run at 80% max current. 15 amp breaker = 12 amps, 20 amp breaker = 16 amps.
Code has evolved to the point where you cannot mix lighting circuits with outlets (GFCI, arc fault, etc.). Given we now have dedicated lighting circuits, 14ga wire on 15a breakers is fine...as LED continues to evolve, even that will be over-kill.Knowing the electricity demands today, I can't see anyone who has a conscience, using 14 gauge for any new construction.
They used a lot of 14 gauge around here in the 80's. Most of it was installed with push in connections on the switches, and receptacles.
After 30+ years of use, the connection is often so bad, you can pull the wire out of the back, without much difficulty.
Shared neutral for some circumstances has been discussed. It's not clear the ops case meets this since op says he requires dedicated dishwasher circuit. Some might argue it is still dedicated with a dual breaker, I'm not sure, and too indifferent to get my code book out. I know I wouldn't install it that way, nor would I allow it in my house. Maybe Canadian code allows?Wrong, neutral can be shared when the two single phase supply breakers are on line 1 and line 2.
Light circuits should be separate from receptacle circuits in home, business and industry.
The fridge should be on it's own dedicated circuit with it's own ordinary breaker , the only other shared load a recessed single receptacle for an electric wall clock which is a good idea as it will indicate a tripped breaker. Receptacle for fridge if behind fridge and obstructed from access can be a plain non tamper proof, no AFCI and no GFCI .
So, with respect to cost there appears to be some savings but, at least to my mind, minor in relation to the cost of building a single family residence. And minor in relation to living with the identified quirks of shared neutral for decades.
Now there is the second question about function. The discussion has identified several functional downsides. Are there any functional advantages to shared neutral?
Just because something can be done, does not mean it should be done.
14ga is a bit easier to deal with.Even on dedicated lighting circuits, I can't see 14 gauge. Yes, it's theoretically enough.
I have also seen them tapped into. It's just not worth the few dollars it saves.
Last time I checked, it's also not allowed in some locations here.