buickanddeere
Super Member
Pumped storage works well on large scale but lifting mass can be scaled from mini to mega. I think.
Where are you going to install 50000 MW of stored power ? Who is paying ?
Pumped storage works well on large scale but lifting mass can be scaled from mini to mega. I think.
These comments are fatalistic. This thread has to do with balancing the generation and consumption of energy, NOT supplying it in the first place.
No great lakes reservoirs are needed with the present situation.
Still, there are locations that suffer "brown outs" that just "might" be alleviated with reserve generation capacity. Such as using the off peak surplus capacity to be reclaimed in time of need.
I don't know if I'll ever own one, but did you know that a Prius or any other hybrid can be used as a standby generator for your house with a simple kit?
Prius has a 30kW generator.
The better ones start and stop the engine as needed to maintain the charge. Quiet too!
That's a grid tie system. It's not difficult to have a transfer disconnect switch to make proprietary. At that point he would be charging his OWN bank of Agm batteries connected to his inverterI was in a house servicing a boiler and noticed the gentleman had a solar system installed. At the end of the service call he was nice enough to show me it. I was quite impressed at the complexity of it and at the point in time on that particular day was making about 3500 watts. So we began talking more and more and although he can sell back to the grid it seemed as though his particular system came with some strings attached. So here's the catch if the power goes out he can't just make and use the power he's creating. I couldn't believe that a system as nice as it was was useless to him if the power went out. At that point I wasn't convinced I would ever have something like that. I'm sure it has its uses and cuts down his dependence on the grid but man if the power is out you are SOL.
yes a 30 k generator will weigh close to 3000 lbs
are you sure that is not a 3 k conversion for the prius?
The plant I am currently working on is coal burning. I don't know what the original budget was but I am guessing it was way over a billion. After all the delays and cost overruns the current cost is about double and still rising. It has name capacity 582 MW so estimated cost per 1W of installed capacity will be about $4-5. When done it will require several hundred people keeping it in operation. It is clear that cost of electric power will go up and at the cost will be passed on the customers.Where are you going to install 50000 MW of stored power ? Who is paying ?
And an advantage in "water rich" areas like Mississippi is that you can get an extra 40 inches or so times the size of your basin above the containment area. I've a hill near my Mississippi residence where I could build a half acre pond, collect water from about 25 acres of my own land (I own to the ridgelines and beyond) and get 100' of head for a small water turbine.Even a "water tower" sized installation could suffice for small scale energy storage. Water is mass,..... 1000kg per meter^3
The pumped storage plant at Raccoon Mountain is a prime example of the recreation opportunities and minimal environmental impact of hydroelectric power. It produces 1,650 megawatts of power - See more at: TVA - Hydroelectric
I don't know if I'll ever own one, but did you know that a Prius or any other hybrid can be used as a standby generator for your house with a simple kit?
Prius has a 30kW generator.
The better ones start and stop the engine as needed to maintain the charge. Quiet too!
ok- this is the largest i could find, still i am impressed
Plug-Out Island kit Prius 5kva 24/12-6hz psw: Home
I know people who bought 60 000 dollars truck as daily driver to work. Show me a 60k daily driver making 300 a month. In fact it costs probably more than 500/month in fuel, insurance and financing cost. So we drive our used cars and have 36k PV system that saves us 277 USD/month in electric bill cost. It will take 16 years to break even if you want to know. It seems long time but after 16 years it will still produce energy while the truck owner will have pretty much worthless piece of junk he sank huge amount of money in for questionable "fun" to drive thing. How smart is that? Well , I should stop being sarcastic. We are guilty of such thing too. Our house way too big and has way too many bathrooms for two people, not speaking about my wife's closet. :banghead: Fortunately in our good old USA we can buy (smart or not smart) what we want but not necessarily what we need. I rest my case.
The plant I am currently working on is coal burning. I don't know what the original budget was but I am guessing it was way over a billion. After all the delays and cost overruns the current cost is about double and still rising. It has name capacity 582 MW so estimated cost per 1W of installed capacity will be about $4-5. When done it will require several hundred people keeping it in operation. It is clear that cost of electric power will go up and at the cost will be passed on the customers.
Edit: I just looked up the owner of the plant web site. The current cost of the plant is 6.5 billion. That is over $10/W of capacity.
The power grid had stability issues from day one. That is why we have street lights whose original purpose was to provide night load for the generators. So any energy storage can be used to even out generation/demand discrepancies. In fact if electric cars become ubiquitous they could serve such purpose while plugged in.
There were dreamers 100 years ago saying that one day we will have electric power more or less to every object in the USA. They were told it can't be done. But we have electric power more or less to every object in the USA. We also have several hundred million cars in operation. And those have to be replaced just about every 16 years. So if that can be done somebody will make energy storage on such scale. The technologies exist. It is just matter of cost.
I am currently working on a power station under construction. It is about 18 month late, not even close to be finished and about 100% over budget. It is clear to me that after it is all done the owner of the plant will ask for rate increase. Couple more of those and wind, PV or what ever new will show up will be cheaper than power from coal or gas.
In fact the utility that supply power to the grid my house is connected to (The utility is hostile to residential solar) just signed a contract to build 200 MW PV generation plant in phase one and wants to build two more of similar size sometime later.
As a natural born redneck, if you keep talking all this looney left alternate energy stuff I'm going to demote you all the way back to kindergarten. LOL
If you want to read about something that has real promise start checking into this Thorium Energy Alliance Portal
then wonder why we aren't doing it. It's worth noting that we've already built successful reactors and we have abundant supplies of thorium so the only thing left to do is a little engineering but no real physics. It could at least get us to day when fusion powers the grid. The only significant things standing in the way are the fossil fuel economy and politics. In other words the powers that are. Remember you could easily convert existing fossil fueled plants to use a thorium reactor as the heat source, all the turbines and the rest of it remain unchanged. It also scales easily. For a county that put men on the moon in less than 10 years, this would be a cakewalk and a slam dunk.