buckeyefarmer
Epic Contributor
On the Arkansas side of this bridge, I40 is mostly all elevated until it hits I55.. they have just rebuilt the entire road from this bridge to where I55 goes north from I40.
So what should they have done, promoted him?Unfortunately for the fired inspector, he's going to be the example they set about thoroughness and the results when they discover that you are not doing an adequate job.
Surprised they just didn’t throw him off the bridge. The question is should he have found it? They found it with a drone. Should he have used one or did he have one available? Seems like when this stuff happens there has to be a fall guy, and in this case it may or may not be justified.
But they didn't. They reviewed the drone footage after the crack was found and the bridge closed.They found it with a drone.
As I read the story, the footage was taken by another company inspecting a different portion of the bridge.They went back and reviewed the drone footage the inspector viewed and clearly saw the crack before it fully broke. Inspector missed it twice.
My point was that his punishment will be excessive to send a mock message, regardless of the fact finding they do. Kinda like the shutting down of an entire country and now imaginary "science" that says it is safe to quit doing this or that.So what should they have done, promoted him?
It's not very likely they fired him without determining his area of responsibility included the failed beam. Based on the info provided he should have been fired.My point was that his punishment will be excessive to send a mock message, regardless of the fact finding they do. Kinda like the shutting down of an entire country and now imaginary "science" that says it is safe to quit doing this or that.
Who knows what portion of the bridge he was tasked with inspecting. It is apparent that that no one person or company was responsible for inspecting the bridge 100% because they have mentioned other inspections on different portions of the bridge. He will most likely not be the last sacrificial lamb.
What about expansion joints? or are they omitted in that style of construction, or climate.Its a lateral bending failure, not a vertical overload. Could be wind force or even sun loading on 1 side. Three members = over-strained. ! has to yield.
Its a lateral bending failure, not a vertical overload. Could be wind force or even sun loading on 1 side. Three members = over-strained. ! has to yield.
What about expansion joints? or are they omitted in that style of construction, or climate.
It's not very likely they fired him without determining his area of responsibility included the failed beam. Based on the info provided he should have been fired.
Expansion joints have nothing to do with winds.It has been long time since bridge in us failed from normal winds
They better start going back in time then: There are pics of the crack visible going back to 2016!Fracture critical members of bridge require yearly inspection. He deserves to be fired if crack is shown in 2019
No pic from 2016?They better start going back in time then: There are pics of the crack visible going back to 2016!
This is per a pic shown on the TNDeer.com site.
![]()
Picture #1 Photos of the Hernando de Soto bride, captured by Memphis resident Barry Moore during an August 2016 canoe trip, suggest the fracture in the steel box beam began much earlier than previously acknowledged.