Who Broke The Bridge?

   / Who Broke The Bridge? #91  
Its a lateral bending failure, not a vertical overload. Could be wind force or even sun loading on 1 side. Three members = over-strained. ! has to yield.
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #92  
Its a lateral bending failure, not a vertical overload. Could be wind force or even sun loading on 1 side. Three members = over-strained. ! has to yield.
What about expansion joints? or are they omitted in that style of construction, or climate.
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #93  
Cause of failure has not been determined.
Speculation at this point
Its a lateral bending failure, not a vertical overload. Could be wind force or even sun loading on 1 side. Three members = over-strained. ! has to yield.
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #95  
Fracture critical members of bridge require yearly inspection. He deserves to be fired if crack is shown in 2019
It's not very likely they fired him without determining his area of responsibility included the failed beam. Based on the info provided he should have been fired.
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #96  
It has been long time since bridge in us failed from normal winds
Expansion joints have nothing to do with winds.
They are to allow expansion/shrinkage from temperatures.
At 30-40 below steel can shrink as much as 2-3 inches over a typical bridge span and if firmly affixed, i.e., welded the metal can fail.
Heat can stretch most metals, ('cause them to expand').
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #97  
Fracture critical members of bridge require yearly inspection. He deserves to be fired if crack is shown in 2019
They better start going back in time then: There are pics of the crack visible going back to 2016!

This is per a pic shown on the TNDeer.com site.

:eek:
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #100  
Picture from '16 here:



It's fairly large, so I don't want to embed it.
Picture #1 Photos of the Hernando de Soto bride, captured by Memphis resident Barry Moore during an August 2016 canoe trip, suggest the fracture in the steel box beam began much earlier than previously acknowledged.

Picture #2: Based on the meta data from Barry Moore's submitted photo taken in 2016, the Commercial Appeal input the coordinates (35° 9' 13.40"N, 90° 3' 40.00" W) into Google Earth to find approximate location that the photo was captured.
BB1gUpIl.jpg
BB1gUNns.jpg
 
 
Top