You could replace the valve with a series/parallel type valve. With this type valve the tank port will close allowing the remaining fluid from the first spool to be used in the second. It is limited to flow of course and will operate slower.
A series valve has such a small window to allow for simultaneous operation that it is impractical to utilize.
That's interesting! I didn't know there was such a thing as a series/parallel type valve. Sounds like I need to do some reading.
No, I couldn't. Sorry I wasn't clear. Just didn't seem to need it as much with the bucket. With the grapple it would make a few things easier.
You could replace the valve with a series/parallel type valve. With this type valve the tank port will close allowing the remaining fluid from the first spool to be used in the second. It is limited to flow of course and will operate slower.
A series valve has such a small window to allow for simultaneous operation that it is impractical to utilize.
So if it operates slower with the series/parallel valve would the next mod be to replace the pump with a higher volume one?
My Kioti LK 2554 originally cam with a 8 GPM pump and it was slow and getting weak so I replaced it with a 10 GPM one that was an upgrade for the LK3054. I just had to change the studs to bolts and it fit perfectly. Easy in this case.
I replaced the valve with a 3 spool to add a grapple. It took a while to source the valve I wanted and wound up with 2 because I did not like the first replacement for the loader. I design flaw in the valve body caused lowering the boom to be uncontrollable. Both of these valves were the parallel/series type valves that allowed two functions at same time. In fact I have done all three functions at the same time but with no weight.
Your Branson has a 13 GPM pump so it would perform better on the Branson. I do use multiple functions for certain situations but normally I find it faster just to do one at a time.
Thanks K5. So in your estimation (and I won't hold you to it) I could change the valves but keep the existing pump?
It certainly will make a difference. If you have room, getting stacked valves gives you more options than the monoblock valve. For example, you can get load checks on each spool which I believe would be beneficial if you are doing heavy lifting with pallet forks. My valves only have one check valve. Works ok but have had situations where the load would drop a bit before lifting.
Whatever you get, don't buy a Youli valve. Not impressed with there quality. Walvoil valves are very good quality. Made in Italy.
The used valve I have for my homemade loader was from a backhoe loader, either a Case or a CAT. It does have all those features like load check valves, Float with anti cavitation valve, work port relief valves on one circuit and more stuff. I do believe it also have a parallel/series combination but I had to swap the sections around to be able to build a joystick, so I think I might have lost that feature. I always wonder if I had leave it the way I got it, how the loader would behave, specially with two functions.
I've never learned about those parallel/series/tandem combinations and probably should. I just saw it on the literature from my valve and looked a bit complex at first glance. It's made by Rexroth.
Either way, I can do both functions at the same time, it's just a bit hard to find the sweet spot because my joystick is not quite perfect. Also I went a bit overboard on the size of the cylinders and it's a bit too slow with two functions.
Also, Bob's tractor also have the 8.9 GPM main pump with 13cc. Same as the 15 series and some of the 20 series. The 25 series seems to use a 16 cc pump which would put out 11 GPM and the bigger models of the 20 series uses a 15 cc pump with 10.3GPM. I suppose one could get the bigger 16 cc pump.
EDIT: I'm using Branson website as reference for the size of pumps and we all know that the info is not always right there.
Never messed with a cable setup before. Is there any adjustments on those?