Transmission/Hydraulic Oil

/ Transmission/Hydraulic Oil #1  

Fikey

New member
Joined
Feb 20, 2026
Messages
3
Tractor
NH Workmaster 75
Is there any factual reason to use NH brand (134) oil as opposed to a universal hydraulic oil?
 
/ Transmission/Hydraulic Oil #2  
Opinions vary, but factually these oils are not manufactured to universal standards like API engine oils are. They may state an ISO viscosity rating, and claim compatibility with various OEM fluids.
My favorite example was a post here on TBN years ago that showed the front lable of a UTF (non OEM) fluid claiming compatibility with all modern tractor hydraulics and transmissions... The back lable said it was not to be used in machines manufactured after 1972.
 
/ Transmission/Hydraulic Oil #3  
Maybe warranty, but even then I don’t think it’s strictly necessary.

As long as it meets the spec of NH134D you’re good. You wouldn’t go to a car dealer every time you needed a jug of engine oil I assume, or back to the dealer for tubes of grease :)

Most manuals will have a page on service for lube specifications, usually that states “When proprietary product is not available, use one that meets (fluid specification.)”

I work on compact tractors for a living. I’ve yet to see or hear of any sort of hydraulic or hydrostatic damage from using equivalent aftermarket fluids.
(NEVER PUT 303 IN A NEWER TRACTOR-ITS NOT GOOD FOR WET BRAKES OR CLUTCHES.)

80% of hydraulic or hydrostatic failures I see are from lack of maintenance or abuse. Especially in power shift transmissions, contaminated fluid is real bad for them.
 
Last edited:
/ Transmission/Hydraulic Oil #4  
Opinions vary, but factually these oils are not manufactured to universal standards like API engine oils are. They may state an ISO viscosity rating, and claim compatibility with various OEM fluids.
My favorite example was a post here on TBN years ago that showed the front lable of a UTF (non OEM) fluid claiming compatibility with all modern tractor hydraulics and transmissions... The back lable said it was not to be used in machines manufactured after 1972.
It’s just me, but “compatible with” is a very misunderstood term. I take it to mean “This is a product that will not produce an adverse reaction when mixed/used in the aforementioned.”

Meeting the specifications of a fluid should result in something that’s chemically indistingushable in components and performance.
 

Marketplace Items

2009 KENWORTH T6 SERIES (INOPERABLE) (A63569)
2009 KENWORTH T6...
2006 Miller Built Gooseneck Trailer (A63116)
2006 Miller Built...
Arrow Quip Head Holder (A64047)
Arrow Quip Head...
2014 Magnum 7696BLA Light Tower (A59213)
2014 Magnum...
2012 WESTERNSTAR 4900FA (A63569)
2012 WESTERNSTAR...
2020 FORD RANGER(INOPERABLE) (A63569)
2020 FORD...
 
Top