Starship News

/ Starship News
  • Thread Starter
#221  
Delayed again, presently set for 16-Jan, same launch window, that starts 4:00pm CST.
I suspect the forecast 20 mph winds might be the reason, Thursday's forecast is for 15 mph winds, Friday's forecast is back to 20 mph winds... I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't launch this week due to weather.

That makes sense, especially if they attempt another booster catch.
 
/ Starship News #222  
That makes sense, especially if they attempt another booster catch.
They are going to attempt another booster catch on Launch 7. Apparently on Launch 6 take off, some of the communication equipment atop the tower got destroyed and that is why they didn't attempt a catch on Launch 6. They have added better protection to the comm equipment, added comm redundancy and added radar to the tower to better track the returning booster/ship.
 
/ Starship News
  • Thread Starter
#223  
Watched the Blue Origin Flight at midnight, They failed to land the booster but everything else went really well.

Starship sure takes off and accelerates Much quicker. Glad to see a success for New Glen.

 
/ Starship News #224  
Looks like a major malfunction today for SpaceX. Too bad. Keep pushing.
 
/ Starship News #225  
Flight 7- Booster launch, return and catch successful.
Starship on the other hand appears to have broken up and put on quite the show over the Turks and Cacaos as it disintegrated and the pieces fell to earth.
 
/ Starship News #227  
very cool video!
 
/ Starship News #230  
I have my doubts. These have been around in one form or another for some time. I'm not sure why this development got so much press, but it did get a ton of press.

The old phrase for it was often "ion drive" or "ion thrust" rather than plasma, but the principle is the same. Most modern satellites use Xenon or Argon for ion thrust in orbit. Thrust goes as 1/2*mv*v, so using increasingly heavy ions increases thrust linearly, and accelerating the ions to higher velocities increases thrust at the square of the increase in velocity. They were proposing using fairly light mass, but high velocities.

The plasma drive proposes to get to higher velocities with magnets (heavy) rather than RF, or high voltage as has been currently done.

I will be more impressed if the company gets a rocket to Mars, and puts it into orbit and then returns.

Who me, a skeptic? 😉

All the best,

Peter
 
/ Starship News #232  
Spaceflightnow is listing Starship flight 8 as launching NET 28-Feb-25 at 6:30pm EST
NET- Not Earlier Than
Looks like launch is coming sooner rather than later.
 
/ Starship News #235  
They had Starship unstacked and back to the hangar within a couple of hours. Booster will be next. Depending on what they find, they may launch on Wednesday, but I wouldn't bet on it.
This would take NASA a minimum six months, or more.
 
/ Starship News #238  
Flight 8 lifted off and the booster returned to the launch site and was successfully caught. Starship lost several engines, tumbled and was lost... again.
Hmmm...not getting the failures on Starship. Maybe to much forces are shaking somethings apart as it is going up. Too bad. Keep trying.
 

Marketplace Items

Frontier 60" Bucket Grapple (A60463)
Frontier 60"...
2007 FREIGHTLINER M2 106 4X2 26FT BOX TRUCK (A59906)
2007 FREIGHTLINER...
2020 Kubota B2301 (A60462)
2020 Kubota B2301...
Godwin CD150M Dri-Prime Towable Trash Pump (A61567)
Godwin CD150M...
2024 Linx EQ07020RS (A60463)
2024 Linx...
JLG 660SJ (A58214)
JLG 660SJ (A58214)
 
Top