Starlink

[BufordBoone]

Try putting the Mesh Router closer to the Starlink router. I think it should work better if you get it's signal percentage higher. Typically with WiFi, the lower the signal strength, the slower the speed.

I am curios why you bought one if you didn't have a problem to begin with?

We like to sit on a small deck in the edge of the woods, probably about 55 yards from where I've got the mesh router. The SL router is another 36 or so feet beyond that but thru a couple of walls. We got OK signal strength while sitting on the deck.

I figured putting a mesh between us would give us great signal strength on the deck. It has but the mesh says it is only getting 40% signal from the SL router.

 

[ponytug]

Having both routers on the same height would help some, as there are fewer obstructions.

Have you considered moving the Starlink router closer to the center of the cabin, and the mesh router closer to a window toward your deck?

I would focus less on what the WiFi strength is, and more on whether there is enough signal for your devices to do what you want them to do.

Mesh networks are easy, but wired networks will almost always out perform them. (E.g. get the $20 ethernet adapter, and an outside WiFi access point that you can point toward your deck...)

All the best, Peter

 

[BufordBoone]

Having both routers on the same height would help some, as there are fewer obstructions.

Have you considered moving the Starlink router closer to the center of the cabin, and the mesh router closer to a window toward your deck?

I would focus less on what the WiFi strength is, and more on whether there is enough signal for your devices to do what you want them to do.

Mesh networks are easy, but wired networks will almost always out perform them. (E.g. get the $20 ethernet adapter, and an outside WiFi access point that you can point toward your deck...)

All the best, Peter

Thanks for all the help. You have me on the right track.

Regardless of the solution, I still think the Starlink router connection to the Starlink mesh should have more range. What it does have is...pitiful.

 

[BigBlue1]

Understood. However, I expected a bit more range. The Starlink is installed in a small cabin with a loft. I added a garage to the cabin. The Starlink router is upstairs on the South End of the building. I put the mesh on the North end of the 1st floor. Besides the vertical, I expect they are about 30' apart. Total distance might be 36'. The wall and ceiling between them is standard construction. Should I expect to have to put a mesh closer than every 36'? Perhaps I should return the SL and go with another system.

That distance isn't really 'too much'. However, a lot depends on any interference between the two nodes. i.e. If you have metal walls or some type of electrical equipment between them, etc. In my house, which is a basically a two level 'ranch' style setup, I have the master TP-Link Deco node by my Starlink gear on one end of the house, another about 30-ish feet away on the lower level, and then a third another 15-20 feet further on the other end of the house back on the main level. And that mesh system did WONDERS to give me solid wi-fi signal and throughput throughout the house. Our house is just simple stick built with drywall, so no real interference materials.

Are there any other electrical/electronic devices near either node?

 

[BufordBoone]

That distance isn't really 'too much'. However, a lot depends on any interference between the two nodes. i.e. If you have metal walls or some type of electrical equipment between them, etc. In my house, which is a basically a two level 'ranch' style setup, I have the master TP-Link Deco node by my Starlink gear on one end of the house, another about 30-ish feet away on the lower level, and then a third another 15-20 feet further on the other end of the house back on the main level. And that mesh system did WONDERS to give me solid wi-fi signal and throughput throughout the house. Our house is just simple stick built with drywall, so no real interference materials.

Are there any other electrical/electronic devices near either node?

Nope, no other electrical/electronic devices near either node. My house is also simple stick built with drywall. I may return the Starlink and go with another mesh. Or, just may decide it is not worth the effort. Thanks, to all, for the help.

 

[sodamo]

I too am a bit disappointed with the SL mesh. Likely too high expectations. Tried in two scenarios.

First, at the main house I have need to internet out to my tractor/utility shed to monitor my off grid PV system. In the past, I’ve used a combination of Apple Airport, then replaced with 1st generation Eero, which while weak was reliable. Distance and my concrete SIP walls too much a challenge for SL. Recently upgraded to Eero Pro 6E and have 4 bar signal.

Second scenario, I have SL RV at the cottage with primary SL on the 2nd floor. Poor coverage down stairs and outside the Hardie panel walls. Tried the SL mesh router downstairs and saw limited improvement. Replaced with 2 of my 1st gen eeros ( 1 up /1 down) with excellent coverage.

At this point I haven’t put either system in Bypass mode but intend to. Keeping my extra SL router as a spare.

 

[plowhog]

I have what seems to be another SL router failure.

My SL router (CA property) stopped working. All network system components were plugged in and powered up, but internet connectivity stopped. I verified the light on the bottom of the SL router was lit.

Cycled power on the SL router, and waited. After a short time my internet connectivity was back. No other changes. It worked about 10-20 mins, then failed again in the exact same way.

Cycled power again, it came back on line, and failed again. Repeated this a 3rd time and it did it again.

Just by chance I had my SL "RV" system with me. I swapped in the "RV" router and it came back online with no additional failures. Been stable for 12+ hours now.

One other interesting observation. I confirmed my snow melt is set to "auto." But it was 31F this morning and the dish was not heating. This is the same dish that acquired about 3" of snow on it previously. So I'm considering going into "ON" mode for snow melt, at least until Spring.

 

[ponytug]

I have what seems to be another SL router failure.

My SL router (CA property) stopped working. All network system components were plugged in and powered up, but internet connectivity stopped. I verified the light on the bottom of the SL router was lit.

Cycled power on the SL router, and waited. After a short time my internet connectivity was back. No other changes. It worked about 10-20 mins, then failed again in the exact same way.

Cycled power again, it came back on line, and failed again. Repeated this a 3rd time and it did it again.

Just by chance I had my SL "RV" system with me. I swapped in the "RV" router and it came back online with no additional failures. Been stable for 12+ hours now.

One other interesting observation. I confirmed my snow melt is set to "auto." But it was 31F this morning and the dish was not heating. This is the same dish that acquired about 3" of snow on it previously. So I'm considering going into "ON" mode for snow melt, at least until Spring.

Sorry to hear about the failure, but I am really glad to hear that the swap worked. Did you need to do a factory reset on the RV one, or is it operating as an RV router, or...? Is your router on a surge suppressor?

Does anyone know for sure if the ice melt kicks in when a) it is below 32F and there is signal attenuation? There are reports on other forums that suggest it is the case, plus the fact that Starlink offers an always on mode makes me think there is some algorithm behind "Auto".

All the best,

Peter

 

[plowhog]

Did you need to do a factory reset on the RV one, or is it operating as an RV router, or...? Is your router on a surge suppressor?

I had to change the RV router to use bypass mode. No changes other than that.

The SL router, 3rd party router, and NAS are on battery backup and conditioned power.

I found reports where the seating on the connector at the antenna has worked its way to be a little loose over time. I was able to re-seat mine back in about 1/16 of an inch. I know it was tight when I installed it so it has move a very small amount. Not sure that's an issue but it seems to have caused others grief.

 

[JRH02]

It's that time of year and we've had our recent comparatively mild cold hits compared to other parts of the U.S. We are near the Columbia Gorge. I've had the heater completely shut off since day one (1.5 years ago). We are off grid and make all of our power at this time of year - it's generator season. I have no desire to run the heater just because the temperature gets to and below the freezing range. I am sure that I set it up originally with the local laptop.

But our signal got flakey with some freezing rain recently and I went to turn on the heater from our local network. The StarLink router access had the heater dimmed out with a note that I had to do it with the mobile app?!? Seems I had done everything locally when I set it up without the mobile app. We have no cell signal so all of our IP/Cell goes through StarLink. And I don't install apps I don't need or use, esp when we have no cell signal. So how do I manage aspects of the local configuration unless I jump in the rig and drive an hour to find a cell data connection? And then back. Duh?

It was the marketing niche of StarLink to provide a decent connection to remote areas. But then there is this BOHICA? Why the heck can't the local configuration be adjusted locally?