Serious tree mulcher .

   / Serious tree mulcher . #1  

Eagleview

Veteran Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
1,903
Location
Orstraya , Ex convict stock , G'day .
It seems this guy was not impressed with the machines available for mulching , so he built his own . Based on a CAT track loader with a 420hp C12 CAT engine hanging off the back , with a belt driven self built mulching head on the loader arms . It also has a rear mounted winch . Have a look at the thickness of the mulcher body in the picture of the rotor . I'd love to see it in action , it's for sale for $350,000 AU .
 
   / Serious tree mulcher . #2  
Pretty impressive to take on that build. It looks pretty well done. Im curious as to why he went with a belt drive over hydraulic? I cant think of another direct belt drive mulcher off the top of my head.It'd be cool to see a video of it in action.
 
   / Serious tree mulcher . #3  
Im curious as to why he went with a belt drive over hydraulic?
Belt drive is more efficient than hydraulics: just figure that a belt drive needs no additional cooling: the need for cooling means that mechanical energy is lost into heat...

I do wonder how he tightens those very long belts though...
 
   / Serious tree mulcher . #4  
Re: Long belts. Yeah thats what i was getting at. I know belts are more efficient, but its a long way from the power pack to the head. Even if he used several short belts, it could be a nightmare.

Also dont forget that he'd need some sort of a clutching arrangement to prevent burning the belts if the rotor jams (which can happen a fair bit with a mulcher)
 
   / Serious tree mulcher .
  • Thread Starter
#5  
If you look at the first picture you can see a downward facing protrusion just before the rotor pulley on the belt cover . I would say it has a spring loaded idler to keep the front belts tight . There would obviously be a pulley at the loader arm pivot point where the front and rear belts meet so lifting the arms would have no effect on the belts . I would guess that the C12 engine would be running at low revs , using it's available torque to give good fuel economy and the rotor speed increased by the use of maybe a 2-1 pulley ratio . I would think it would be more efficient than running a hydraulic pump at high revs with all the associated losses .
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2023 PETERBILT 389 TANDEM AXLE SLEEPER (A53426)
2023 PETERBILT 389...
DeeZee Crossover Aluminum Truck Tool Box - Secure Weather-Resistant Storage for Pickup Beds (A53472)
DeeZee Crossover...
2025 CFG Industrial MX15RX (A50123)
2025 CFG...
2015 JOHN DEERE 310K BACKHOE (A51406)
2015 JOHN DEERE...
BRAWN CORPORATION ELECTRIC WHEELCHAIR LIFT (A51248)
BRAWN CORPORATION...
(1) UNUSED 5200# DROP AXLE W/ BRAKES (A51247)
(1) UNUSED 5200#...
 
Top