Yes, I agree, and, as airbiscuit mentioned above, the bucket curl usually seems to have plenty of force due to its geometry. I do notice on larger industrial payloaders that the linkage is reversed which results in the base end of the bucket cylinder doing the curl. Not sure if that is because more curl force is needed or the self-leveling system just works out better design wise with the cylinder "pushing the curl".What was the bore of the original cylinder?
3.14 sq inches x 2500psi is still almost 8000# of retract force....times 2 cylinders....
Then it becomes a geometry thing to figure that at bucket edge
OEM being 1-3/8 and going to 1-1/2 rod is not a huge amount.
It is a cost issue when it comes to the push versus pull design. There are more heavy duty linkages to make the extend function curl the bucket. The FELs are designed as cheap as possible.Yes, I agree, and, as airbiscuit mentioned above, the bucket curl usually seems to have plenty of force due to its geometry. I do notice on larger industrial payloaders that the linkage is reversed which results in the base end of the bucket cylinder doing the curl. Not sure if that is because more curl force is needed or the self-leveling system just works out better design wise with the cylinder "pushing the curl".