On my small tractors, I like weights, but on the bigger ones I always add fluid.
I am curious why? I don't think there is anything wrong with wheel weights, I just haven't seen what the advantage is over using liquid ballast. Liquid ballast is sure cheaper. If you have a need to remove the weight do to your applications or your setting is prone to tire punctures, I understand. Other wise what is the advantage?
MarkV
Couple of factors really.
1. I have lost a lot of fluid over the years due to punctures.
2. I have to call a service truck for the big tractors, but I can remove the little ones and take them to the shop or plug them myself.
I go with fluid in the bigger tractors due to the cost and I mow on a lot of inclines and fluid "seems" to lower COG and help them stick to the ground better.
Well I sure understand that! In my case I have had one of my tractors for 10 years with non-toxic anti-freeze and water in the rears and no leaks. I live in the South so I did it in the drive for little money and little worry of freeze issues. It sure did help with stability in the N. Georgia mountains where I originally bought it to use. We don't have the Locus thorns or sharp rock some on the forum have so punctures haven't been a problem for me. Wheel weights were just so much more expensive I couldn't see the advantage. Guess it is a bit like land, Location, Location,Location, is what you have to look at to decide what is best for you. Inter-net experience is valuable but not necessarily universal. You still have to see what is best in your area.
Thanks,
MarkV
Update on the water in tires, I got a hold of the sales manager and he said they always add water to the rear tires with a loader on it. So the delivery guy was wrong