While everyone here has good numbers in mind, I have to disagree with the group here, just because of the unique lift to weight ratio I've observed on this particular machine. I have the 3033R, same tractor as your 3046R, with a smaller engine.
The trouble with this tractor is that the 320R loader is so unusually heavy that, even given the substantial weight of this machine, the ass gets awful light awful fast. In this particular regard, it is worse than any other machine I've ever owned. I can't even drive the thing up a damp grassy hill with the HD bucket installed, without going to 4wd if I don't have some weight on the rear.
That #750 lb. safe isn't much, with regard to the lift capacity of that loader (assuming 320R), but it's going to be awful high in the air. If your ground is anything less than level, you're going to want some implement on the rear of that tractor. Mind you, it doesn't have to be a ballast box; a snowblower, aerator, or brush hog works just as well.
Winter,
Great feedback! This is the wave of the future I believe in equipment that is generally less grounded in full tilt agriculture over being a Swiss army pocket knife.
I remember when desktop computers came out (yes... I am that old!), and the buzz words back then were all about the "flexibility" built into a desktop that could run multiple operating systems, hundreds of applications, and support many many more uses than the tools and equipment used previously (like dedicated CAD machines!).
Well my point here is that owning an orange machine of the
L3560 Flavor, the frame length, at 6 to 8" shorter than all of its big brothers, definitely places some dynamic constraints on it. I've found that exact same thing on the
L3560, with loaded tires... big 1600# lifting capacity... but in such a short frame as the 3570, where are ya goin? I'm wondering if engineering isn't opting for technical balance over weight in new models. That is "designed load capability"that concentrates on balance over shear weight of a machine to manage loads? It would definitely bode well for minimizing cost, as weight is costly... especially when it's in steel or cast products.
That short torso of the
L3650 bears little brawn when up against a tall order. And, the fact that we are pushing these things to do more and more at the front end, and the rear... sometimes at the same time, well that can create some "physics of geometry" concerns that we can't address fully with a technically capable, but weight or footprint insufficient model, regardless of designed in benifits.
You bring up an interesting, and timely point.
Vid: S3 #33 Sourcing Free Firewood Material - Trees cut by DOT in an old Canal.
Don
Heavy lifting with an L3560 on uneven ground.