Kubota L4740 return to sump

[Josh1564]

Have yall heard of the Laneshark. That is the fel bushhog l am referring to. I know they run them on tractors all the time and even much smaller tractors ( with a smaller hydraulic motor). They do not seem to have much experience with the grand L's. And not very responsive due to the COVID and everyone working from home. I also get no help from any dealer around. They all tell me it not possible to run a hydraulic motor off of a tractor, that is why most implements are pto driven.
The best place I can find to tie in is on the hard pipe from the loader valve to the sump.

 

[Dave M7040]

My thoughts exactly. Having a constant 8 gpm flow through the return on a rear remote is going to have a lot of restriction through the quick coupler and any other down stream choke points. That is going to make heat and probably why the manufacturer recommended against that.

I'm thinking the rear remotes on CUTs are primarily designed for intermittent use to extend and retract cylinders.

A self contained PTO driven hydraulic power pack rated for the desired flow may be the better option.

Another consideration, keeping in mind the owner plans on powering a heavy rotating cutter with lots of inertia, is the movement of any hydraulic control with the wrong spool is going to bring the motor to an instant stop and likely damage the motor or hydraulic system.

The following explains the difference:

Cylinder spool: work ports blocked in neutral. Motor spool: work ports connected to tank in neutral. ....

Dave M7040

 

[Josh1564]

Any other options come to mind?

Also side question. What is the reason for not running a backhoe like the BH92 off of rear remotes?

 

[Dave M7040]

Any other options come to mind?

Also side question. What is the reason for not running a backhoe like the BH92 off of rear remotes?

For the TLB's the design sees the pump flow first directed to the BH valve and then, using a PB port in the hoe valve, send flow to the loader valve.

This is done to provide the minimum of pressure loss before reaching the hoe.

Also by reducing the number of relief valves before the flow gets to the BH, you can provide a higher operating pressure.

For example, M series kubota's typically send flow to the loader, (which has a relief valve) and then to the rear of the tractor where there is another relief valve for the 3 pt hitch and remotes. If the loader relief is set to say 2,500 psi, you can adjust the rear remote as tight as you want but the pressure will never be able to go about 2,500 psi because the loader relief, which also protects the PB circuit kicks in.

The typical rear remotes are getting hydraulic flow from a PB port on the loader valve.

You will note on tractors where the BH is removable, that the hydraulic power beyond loop has to be maintained with a length of hose whereas with rear remotes, you can just disconnect and forget it.

Dave M7040

 

[Josh1564]

Makes sense Dave, if there was no problem running BH off of remotes, it would eliminate 7 ft. of PB hose. Also would not have that loop of hose sticking out behind tractor. Gets in my way all the time.

 

[Complete Turf Care]

I had a similar issue about 6 years ago. Here is a link to the thread we did on my issue. It's a pretty long thread, but hopefully it will help with your issue.

https://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/hydraulics/297573-laser-grading-hydraulic-valve-issue.html

 

[crazyal]

The front mount blower uses a hydraulic motor to rotate the chute. It uses 3 lines, two for pressure and a 3rd one that returns the fluid. I can look at my 4240 see how the factory does it.

 

[crazyal]

The bad news is it looks like you will loose a lot of hydraulic fluid as the hole is at the bottom of the transmission. It's just a 1/4" hydraulic hose.

 

[Josh1564]

[I had a similar issue about 6 years ago. Here is a link to the thread we did on my issue. It's a pretty long thread, but hopefully it will help with your issue.

https://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/...lve-issue.html]

CompleteLawnCare, did you have continuous hydraulic flow with your blade? Also are you still using it with the fluid returning through the fill port?
I worry about aerating the fluid and over heating the pump.

 

[Complete Turf Care]

[CompleteLawnCare, did you have continuous hydraulic flow with your blade? Also are you still using it with the fluid returning through the fill port?
I worry about aerating the fluid and over heating the pump.[/QUOTE]

I would not say it was continuous flow, but I would consider it intermittent flow. As I am driving along, the blade automatically tries to stay at the same level, therefore it will automatically raise and lower many times during the process. I believe this would potentially cause more heat than continuous flow would cause.

Yes, I am still using it the same way as I posted 6 years ago, and have not had any issues since then. I would guess that I have 200-300 hours using it this way.

I have had some other issues with that tractor and I am considering using my L6060 for laser grading in the future. If I do use the L6060, I will attempt to just bypass the quick coupling fitting on the 'return' line. In other words, I will not dump the 'return' oil into the fill port, but will remove the quick coupling and connect the 'return' hose behind it.

I have purchased the fitting I will need for this, but I have not tried it yet.

Below are where I plan to install this fitting when I do try to use it on my L6060