Kioti CK2610SE Power

[Lee Robinson]

You're going to need more than a backhoe to get to "close to 4000 pounds"

I don't have that model, but he may be closer than you think...

The CX2510 HST tractor is 2260#
Front end loader with bucket is 605#
Backhoe without bucket is over 1000#
Backhow bucket weight? 100#?

Total over 3950# ballast added to tires.

 

[Amvcane]

This might clear some things up. Not sure what a ck2510m is.
Edit: woops, thought I posted the CX manual page.

 

[iptman]

You're going to need more than a backhoe to get to "close to 4000 pounds"

2200 for the tractor, 300 filled tires, 1000 BH and sub frame, 500 loader and bucket.

Edit: Oops, didn't see @Lee Robinson 's post.

 

[iptman]

This might clear some things up. Not sure what a ck2510m is.

View attachment 725433

I'll do you one better. This is a snippet from the factory service manual.

 

[iptman]

I believe everything after the 3A165 designates different tuning and emissions specific to the application and where the tractor is being sold.

 

[iptman]

I could certainly see Kioti underrating their engines to hit the 24.5hp limit. It's not like there's some government agency dyno testing compact tractor engines to make sure they don't make more HP than the company is reporting.

 

[Lee Robinson]

There is a problem with the manuals on the CX2510 with the displacement statement ya'll...

That is the conversion rate.

For the CK2610, they have the conversion ratio correct.

For the CX2510, they have the conversion ratio incorrect.

1647 cc does equal 100.5 CI (as listed on the CK2610)

1647 cc does NOT equal 87 CI (as listed on the CX2510)

They cannot have the same cc displacement on both models but then list different CIs for the models and be correct.

The conversion ratio for CI's to cc's is 16.387.

 

[iptman]

The only place it's wrong is on their website and only regarding cubic inches. When the CX2510 initially hit their website the copy said it had a 3 range transfer case. They eventually fixed that, they just haven't fixed this one. It's just a typo.

 

[Lee Robinson]

I'll do you one better. This is a snippet from the factory service manual.

View attachment 725445

This photo comes from the manual, correct?

Look at the displacement listing. It shows 87 cubic inches there as well. 100.5 cubic inches equals 1647 CI's.
87 CI's only equals 1426 cc's.

I am sure they will fix this in the future...but until then it is either 1647 cc (100.5 CIs) or 1426 cc's (87 CI) because it cannot be 1647 cc AND at the same time be 87 CI's. That's impossible.

 

[the old grind]

I'd read the tag on an engine. "Charts is charts."