Global Warming?

[EE_Bota]

Sorry Top, Dr Frank is a flyweight has been with no more understanding of the science behind AGW than the typical boobilious weather girl on TV.

I'll let you slide this time, but in the future, I expect photographic evidence such people exist.

 

[houstonscott]

I'll let you slide this time, but in the future, I expect photographic evidence such people exist.

I think anyone who would argue that Dr. N. Frank (the DR of metrology) and operated the national hurricane center is flyweight has no credibility themselves, only an idiot would argue that...I think Bota has you on this one.

HS

 

[EE_Bota]

I think anyone who would argue that Dr. N. Frank (the DR of metrology) and operated the national hurricane center is flyweight has no credibility themselves, only an idiot would argue that...I think Bota has you on this one.

HS

Possibly, but it could be too that I just like photos of beautiful weather highly excited about tomorrows weather.

In the politics forum, an attractive woman came under attack because of the agency for which she works. I looked her up, and posted back...'she's a Stanford grad (first in her class?), and an accomplished violinist, and pretty to boot.' I said all that and asked more or less "what have you got to compete with her." The gentleman making the attack admitted that although she is prettier, his legs are not half bad in his humble opinion.

I'm just not one of those people who will discount others because they are easy on the eyes. We can't help we are good looking.

 

[locknut]

You are GOP, being GOP and sharing their blighted understanding of the world- from creationism to global warming- you are part of the impediment to improving this world. I can be ruthless when I choose, to improve things.

Wow,you sound like someone else I know.What do you do in your spare time,write Zero's speeches?

 

[IslandTractor]

I think anyone who would argue that Dr. N. Frank (the DR of metrology) and operated the national hurricane center is flyweight has no credibility themselves, only an idiot would argue that...I think Bota has you on this one.

HS

A scientist's impact and "weight class" can be pretty easily measured through a number of tools looking at publications and the number of times other scientists cite his/her work. While he published plenty on the hurricane forecasting topic in the distant past, he doesn't seem to have published any science at all in the past couple of decades. As I stated earlier, Dr. Frank is a flyweight at best as a scientist on the topic of climate change.

 

[IslandTractor]

I'll let you slide this time, but in the future, I expect photographic evidence such people exist.

Take your pick:

Mayte Carranco Hot Mexican Weather Girl - YouTube

Weather Girl - Romanian Women Hot Presenter Romania - YouTube

La muy caliente Jackie Guerridooooo - YouTube

Weather Girl - Romanian Girls TV Presenter Rumania - YouTube

very sexy weather news from hungary - YouTube (my favorite, she has the legs to go with the rest)

 

[/pine]

...Research is the only way to understand this problem...

Or misunderstand it...

FYI...there was nothing "anti-intellectual" about my opinion...IF there were enough viable, data available to make an absolute conclusion...there would be no dichotomy.

It will be many decades before there will be enough data that will be required to come to said conclusion...and in that time should the current trend stall or reverse itself...the AGW cultists will have to find something else to get their panties in a bunch about...and all the rush to judgement researchers will looking for something else to clamor about

And denying the "political motivation" behind the AGW side is ignorance in its purest form...not to mention the monetary (AKA gold rush) motivations...!

 

[Gator6x4]

Neil Frank has joined with industry advocacy groups like Heartland Institute in claiming that global warming is a hoax, perpetrated by tens, even hundreds of thousands of scientists around the world. Frank and his industry colleagues remain voices crying in the scientific wilderness mostly to far right groups.

Scientific and professional societies around the world agree that global warming is real, that it is caused by humans, and is potentially catastrophic. For example, statements to this effect are available from the National Academy of Science:

America's Climate Choices: Members

The American Physical Society:

Climate Change

There are really smart people in these organizations, and they should all know better. Texas A&M Meteorological Department a very prestigious academic educational institution has been snookered, saying it believes in human-caused global warming:

Climate Change Statement

 

[IslandTractor]

Or misunderstand it...

FYI...there was nothing "anti-intellectual" about my opinion...IF there were enough viable, data available to make an absolute conclusion...there would be no dichotomy.

It will be many decades before there will be enough data that will be required to come to said conclusion...and in that time should the current trend stall or reverse itself...the AGW cultists will have to find something else to get their panties in a bunch about...and all the rush to judgement researchers will looking for something else to clamor about

And denying the "political motivation" behind the AGW side is ignorance in its purest form...not to mention the monetary (AKA gold rush) motivations...!

Your stance is absolutely anti intellectual and unscientific. You are trying to justify taking no action on climate policy because you claim there is an incomplete understanding of the issue. I suppose you disapprove of cancer therapy because we do not fully understand the nature of tumors. Or, perhaps we should not bake pies because the ultimate nature of matter still eludes us?

Your stance on insufficient science is a smoke screen to cover the fact that you have virtually no credible evidence to counter the mass of climate science that does support AGW. I keep asking and none of you right wing deniers has ever posted a science paper in support of your position. We get ridiculous blog quotes and hare brained journalist links but NOTHING from those "thousands" of PhDs who dispute AGW. Put up or shut up.

 

[toppop52]

How many posts of mine did you go after for saying there was warming....! Slowly you are changing.... free your mind of the dark side Luke, step into the light!:cool2::drink::cool2:

You haven't been reading my posts if you believe that! I may dispute a particular period of warming, but I've been on the periodic cycles line of thought most all my life and that hasn't changed. The degree of warming, the periodic weather anomalies that some point to to claim warming caused these, etc..., I dispute, not the fact that we have warmed and cooled.