Global Warming?

Status
Not open for further replies.
   / Global Warming? #2,451  
we agree beer is a good alternative
 
   / Global Warming? #2,452  
Interesting reading:

Saudi Arabia reveals plans to be powered entirely by renewable energy | Environment | guardian.co.uk

Saudi Arabia reveals plans to be powered entirely by renewable energy

World's biggest oil producer says it wants to make a 100% switch from fossil fuels to clean energy

"Oil is more precious for us underground than as a fuel source," he said. "If we can get to the point where we can replace fossil fuels and use oil to produce other products that are useful, that would be very good for the world. I wish that may be in my lifetime, but I don't think it will be."

------------------------
It seems that even the country with a vast supply of fossil fuels has a vusion too the future and ia looking to make the best use of its resource.

Loren
 
   / Global Warming? #2,453  
Loren49 said:
Interesting reading:

Saudi Arabia reveals plans to be powered entirely by renewable energy | Environment | guardian.co.uk

Saudi Arabia reveals plans to be powered entirely by renewable energy

World's biggest oil producer says it wants to make a 100% switch from fossil fuels to clean energy

"Oil is more precious for us underground than as a fuel source," he said. "If we can get to the point where we can replace fossil fuels and use oil to produce other products that are useful, that would be very good for the world. I wish that may be in my lifetime, but I don't think it will be."

------------------------
It seems that even the country with a vast supply of fossil fuels has a vusion too the future and ia looking to make the best use of its resource.

Loren

I agree with the Sheiks of Araby on this point. Oil is the starting point for manufacture of plastics and other materials that are far more valuable than fuel. Why not preserve such resources for future use if we can substitute renewables? There is a balance point out there somewhere between Gore and Cheney.
 
   / Global Warming? #2,455  
Egon said:
...
Economics today say wind is not viable. Yet in days long past wind was viable and provided a livelihood for many a family. It also conveyed market goods to the far corners of the world. So it has been economical and provided well for many people's. It's all about local self sufficiency, manufacturing and non instant transfers of good's. :thumbsup:

It all has to do with what you do with the wind. You can't store the wind or sun. You have to convert it (losses), and then store it (losses). That is the main difference between the old and new economy. Now we want it now and where we want it. We are spoiled, and it looses us at least 50% or more right off the bat.
 
   / Global Warming? #2,456  
It was deliberately caustic
Agreed, but I'm not offended
but his point is a good one.
Perhaps, but it is irrelevant. That's what I find boring.
There is a political thread right down the hall. I think he keeps getting off on the wrong floor so to speak. He's not the only one. Dividing this discussion along party lines makes the thread go around in circles, little circles, inside of larger ones.
Lots of companies have gone under in the past 4 years and our government wastes money, a serious problem. I for one am tired of paying for it,this should be a thread or a forum all by itself, valuable information.
The issue here is called "Global warming" not "National Warming".
The temptation to resort to politics is hard to resist, I get that, But in my opinion, for the interest of proper discussion it should be avoided. Just as it should in any thread. I haven't read the rules but it's probably in there, and there for a reason. ( another irrelevant statement)

This country is all about free enterprise, so it's no surprise that someone sees or develops a trend and gets in front of it to make .... a fortune in some cases, and huge debt in others. Whether it's Al Gore, T.Boone Pickens, Bill Gates or whomever. When it works it's great, when it doesn't....well then it's lost money, but still there is learning.

Our government subsidizes alternative energy, energy efficiency and peripheral innovations...that is as it should be.
 
Last edited:
   / Global Warming? #2,457  
Liberals HATE THIS. Fighting Liberals with facts is like spraying COCKROACHES with insect spray - watch em scatter.

One, from the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center (nope, I’d never heard of it before either), indicates that Antarctica is now surrounded by the greatest area of sea ice ever recorded in the region — some 7.5 million square miles worth, according to satellite data.


Climate Alarmists Hate Good News


Global warming has become a pot of gold for universities — and the purpose-driven scientists and academics they employ — with the debt-ridden federal government “investing” a staggering $42 billion in climate change research and mitigation through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

FOLLOW THE MONEY
 
   / Global Warming? #2,458  
I vote for tread mills, go on welfare and in order to get your check you must walk the tread mill for a wage. tread mill would be hooked to a generator.:D

Funny and Brillaint at the same time. They need to show up at unemployment do the tread mill for 40 hours a week THEN AND ONLY THEN get paid. Watch how fast they take jobs at McDonalds, or sweeping floors
 
   / Global Warming? #2,459  
Global warming has become a pot of gold for universities and the purpose-driven scientists and academics they employ with the debt-ridden federal government 妬nvesting a staggering $42 billion in climate change research and mitigation through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
You have somewhat oversimplified this........

Just trying to help:dance1:

This explains the concept
It has to do with being frugal with our current energy usage, as well as finding cheaper, more sustainable sources.
Basic Information | State and Local | US EPA
This is the cost breakdown
Breakdown of Funding
 
   / Global Warming? #2,460  
Agreed, but I'm not offended

Perhaps, but it is irrelevant. That's what I find boring.
There is a political thread right down the hall. I think he keeps getting off on the wrong floor so to speak. He's not the only one. Dividing this discussion along party lines makes the thread go around in circles, little circles, inside of larger ones.
Lots of companies have gone under in the past 4 years and our government wastes money, a serious problem. I for one am tired of paying for it,this should be a thread or a forum all by itself, valuable information.
The issue here is called "Global warming" not "National Warming".
The temptation to resort to politics is hard to resist, I get that, But in my opinion, for the interest of proper discussion it should be avoided. Just as it should in any thread. I haven't read the rules but it's probably in there, and there for a reason. ( another irrelevant statement)

This country is all about free enterprise, so it's no surprise that someone sees or develops a trend and gets in front of it to make .... a fortune in some cases, and huge debt in others. Whether it's Al Gore, T.Boone Pickens, Bill Gates or whomever. When it works it's great, when it doesn't....well then it's lost money, but still there is learning.

Our government subsidizes alternative energy, energy efficiency and peripheral innovations...that is as it should be.

Your final statement was political in nature, and a big battle can break out on that point alone. So, you are quite right...it is easy to slip into global warming while discussing politics. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

International 1420 Combine (A50514)
International 1420...
12 foot two person Terry aluminum John boat (A50324)
12 foot two person...
vergenes (A50657)
vergenes (A50657)
McDon 75D Flex Draper Head (A52349)
McDon 75D Flex...
2020 KUBOTA RTV X1100C UTV (A51406)
2020 KUBOTA RTV...
2017 GEHL RS5-19 TELEHANDLER (A51242)
2017 GEHL RS5-19...
 
Top