Nearly impossible to have the creature comforts you want while retainin offroad capability.![]()
Well, I guess that depends on your version of "off-roading". I think for some folks, driving down a dusty dirt road is off-roading, but for other folks (I believe you may be included) it takes a lot more. I would like to see a new version of the early Bronco come back and I would be interested in buying one, but it would fall far short of being an off road ride for me. I agree, a solid front axle would be a nice start.
I also have plans to build a early Bronco (71/72) myself. There's a few other projects ahead of it, but I have been gathering parts for a few months. It will be more of a street ride. Something that the wife and I can ride around in on the weekends and enjoy. However... the plan still calls for a full 4 link front and rear, a set of Dana 60's, 39.5 boggers and a 7.3 power stroke.
Excellent post!!!! Best of this thread!!!!
P.S. No pics, it didn't happen.....![]()
The Bronco was never a car. And it's 30 year run was only in name. Only common ground between the 3 different versions was 4 tires.
Seriously? Car is a generic term, and you know it. You're just trying to argue for argument's sake...not exactly a surprise.
Many/most successful automobile (like that better?) lines have been redesigned as time went on, and the name stayed the same, but that doesn't make them any less successful.
The F-150 averages 5 years between major redesigns....completely new vehicles with the same name.
Disregard. Since you seem intent on derailing this thread....time for unsubscribe and ignore list.
Should I resurrect this project,,,?
A 65 Willys, CJ5,, all aluminum body, from the dash back,,,
![]()
There is even an aluminum gas tank,,,
![]()
I could put a Bronco drivetrain under it,,, but,, it would have to have an LS engine,,,
![]()