Acer, LS is trying to sign up dealers, not having 100% success with former farmtrac dealers.their paperwork and prices leave a lot to be desired. we'll see how it plays out.information was put out today that Montana had signed an agreement with Branson, wonder how that is going to affect their LS line? the more things change the more it stays the same.They all want to party on the dealers dime.and long as dealers pay the tab and take all the risk, there is no incentive to change the way big boys view dealers.LS has opened a distribution center in NC. I believe they are in the process of signing up dealers and I heard they are already supplying LS parts to dealers.
But the dealers countered that they, not the auto companies, had always borne the expense of doing business. "We are not a cost to Chrysler," Russell Whatley of Mineral Wells told the committee. "No dealership is a cost to Chrysler. We pay for everything we use and we take all the risk. We are Chrysler's customer. In a typical month, we pay Chrysler over $2,500 in fixed expenses alone, plus all the parts and the vehicles which are paid for in full and up front."[/QUOTE]
Sound familiar?
Sound equitable?
Riddle me this:
Why should the Senate get involved with auto dealers and not tractor/implement dealers?
Why should dealers sign one-sided contracts with vendors/manuafcturers--especially in such volatile times?
--b
Hello, all!
Remember last week's posting when I was pimping the retailers? Well... here's an auto retailer who shares a similar opinion.
But the dealers countered that they, not the auto companies, had always borne the expense of doing business. "We are not a cost to Chrysler," Russell Whatley of Mineral Wells told the committee. "No dealership is a cost to Chrysler. We pay for everything we use and we take all the risk. We are Chrysler's customer. In a typical month, we pay Chrysler over $2,500 in fixed expenses alone, plus all the parts and the vehicles which are paid for in full and up front."[/QUOTE]Actually Blueliner, dealers should not sign one-sided contracts, a contract should be a document designed to accomodate all parties and not an edict from one party over the other,labor unions would never accept such a contract. but dealers, especially farm equipment dealers have a sometimes fatal flaw,THEY ARE HONEST!and they assume those they do business with are also, so the dealers don't always read the fine print, but rather tend to believe promises made to them.one can only hope that bad experiences in the past will result in better judgement in the future.Sound familiar?
Sound equitable?
Riddle me this:
Why should the Senate get involved with auto dealers and not tractor/implement dealers?
Why should dealers sign one-sided contracts with vendors/manuafcturers--especially in such volatile times?
--b
on another note: there is scuttlebutt about a Montana-Kukji (parent co of Branson)deal giving Montana a controling interest .price tag somewhere around 40 mil. anybody hear anything on this??must have been a heck of a profit in the farmtrac takeover if true or maybe a sugar daddy somewhere in the shadows.wonder what that will do to the Montana-LS relationship??
Bet ol Redneck can scope it out.
Taxpayer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MONTANA TRACTORS AND
KUKJE / BRANSON
SIGN LETTER OF INTENT
Parties exploring partnership in North American tractor market
June 5, 2009
Saewook Chang, Vice President of Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd, parent of Kukje Machinery Co., Ltd and Branson Tractors, Inc., and Ted Wade, Vice Chairman & Co-owner of Montana Tractors, LLC, announced the signing of a letter of INTENT for potential joint venture including the merger of Branson Tractors and Montana Tractors to form a North American entity to distribute farm tractors in North America. Mr. Chang and Mr. Wade met this past week in Seoul, and after a tour of Kukje Machinery's tractor production facility and a meeting with its executive team, executed the letter of intent. The potential joint venture is expected to be a more powerful player in North American tractor market in coming years by consolidating distribution-based Montana and manufacturing-based Branson. By forming joint forces through extensive dealership networks of both companies, the new entity will be a strong competitor to other players in North America.
JUDGEMENT!!!!----- ALL THOSE WORDS MEAN DIFFERENT THINGS TO DIFFERENT FOLKS----DEPENDS ON WHAT SIDE OF THE MFG--ING FENCE YOU ARE ON-----DOES THE WORD PROFIT OR SERVICE FIT IN THERE ANYWHERE---ARE WE JUST DOING IT FOR THE FUN OF IT!!!!!![]()
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:19 am Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would be concerned about signing any kind of binding agreement with any tractor MFG or distribution outlet depending on korean production given the news coming out over there at this time.
SEOUL, South Korea North Korea said Tuesday it would use nuclear weapons in a "merciless offensive" if provoked its latest bellicose rhetoric apparently aimed at deterring any international punishment for its recent atomic test blast.
Pyongyang raised tensions a notch by reviving its rhetoric in a commentary in the state-run Minju Joson newspaper Tuesday.
"Our nuclear deterrent will be a strong defensive means ... as well as a merciless offensive means to deal a just retaliatory strike to those who touch the country's dignity and sovereignty even a bit," said the commentary, carried by the official Korean Central News Agency.
KUKJI's parent business is steel mills and anyone old enough to remember wwII knows what happens when a country goes to a allout war, which the use of nukes will surely trigger.steel production is divirted to making war machinery.if the tractor MFGS can't get steel,it is unlikely that any shipping of parts and tractors to the USA will occur.I think I'll just wait and see what happens before I sign with any company, if at all.
Taxpayer