Did I see a Junk not Junkman Post??

Junkman · Jan 22, 2005

( Junkman,

Some people don't have a sense of humour when the Joke is on them. )

I can take any joke when it is meant in good humor, but I don't appreciate having my identity stolen, especially when I asked you not to do so back on August 12, 2004 when I first learned what you were going to do.
(
murph,
I saw that post too, It was quite humourous, but we downunder do see the funny side of things

)
I am certain that you saw the post, because you were the one that made the post under the name of Junk. I believe that you took advantage of the fact that you knew that I was gone and thought that you were going to get me into trouble. As far as people down under seeing things differently than those in the USA, I can't comment. In the USA, we see identity theft as what it is.... an illegal activity that isn't condoned even if it is meant to be what you referred to on August 12th as a "prank". I still have all the correspondence between both you as daedong, and you as Junk. I will forward it to Muhammad if he so requests it, or he can just check my PM's for the date of August 12th when you first advised me that you registered as Junk to pull off a prank. I advised you not to cross the line then, but I guess that you have to learn that lesson the hard way.
-----------------------The evidence-----------------------------

Re: Concerned daedong 08/12/04 09:46 PM
Re: Concerned daedong 08/12/04 08:29 PM
Re: prank junk 08/12/04 08:13 PM
Re: prank junk 08/12/04 08:05 PM
Re: prank junk 08/12/04 08:04 PM
Re: prank daedong 08/12/04 07:51 PM
Re: Concerned daedong 08/12/04 07:27 PM
Re: Concerned daedong 08/12/04 07:03 PM
Re: Concerned daedong 08/12/04 06:53 PM

daedong · Jan 23, 2005

Muhammad,

I may have broken the rules but it was done in fun and fun only. I believe that I did make one vital mistake and that was to trust Junkman with Private Messages when I discovered that he was posting under the name of Dusty . There was no malicious intent to steal his (Junkman's ) identity and if he had seen the post concerned he would realise that.

As the heading of the private messages that Junkman has so kindly displayed publicly indicate, it was a PRANK

This matter has gone too far and has been blown out of all proportions and I will not discuss it any further.

thcri · Jan 23, 2005

( murph,
I saw that post too, It was quite humourous, but we downunder do see the funny side of things

I am certain that you saw the post, because you were the one that made the post under the name of Junk. )

???? I am hoping this is not meant for me. As I read I believe it is suppose to but it runs right after your quote of me? /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif

murph