dodge man
Super Star Member
He needs to!that guy is going to Prison
He needs to!that guy is going to Prison
Everyone connected to that machine leaving home on a truck, unsecured should be in adjoining cells. Not just the fool driving the truck.
No, that's why you hire professional with the proper insurance, knowledge(experience) and equipment so you are not liable. If not what the point?Everyone connected to that machine leaving home on a truck, unsecured should be in adjoining cells. Not just the fool driving the truck.
No, that's why you hire professional with the proper insurance, knowledge(experience) and equipment so you are not liable. If not what the point?
The company owner yes he has a part in this, whether he likes it or not, that's just how it works, compagnies are responsible for their employee negligence regardless how wrong the employee is and regardless how well the company cover itself with Standard operation procedure and training ... but not the dozer owner he has nothing to do with it... from the original post I wasn't sure which he was referring to.All parties involved very well might end up sued especially the truck owner if it’s different from the driver but as far as criminal prosecution the driver is solely responsible.
Too often the owner is the reason for unsafe practices in the first place; whether it's failure to supply adequate tiedowns, or expecting their employees to run overloaded.The company owner yes he has a part in this, whether he likes it or not, that's just how it works, compagnies are responsible for their employee negligence regardless how wrong the employee is and regardless how well the company cover itself with Standard operation procedure and training ... but not the dozer owner he has nothing to do with it... from the original post I wasn't sure which he was referring to.
Perhaps/probably but my point is even if this is not the case, lets say the owner do everything and beyond with all the documentation, discipline, inspection and records to prove it he will still have his share of the blame. We had a incident at our mine, the worker didn't follow the Standard operation procedure and his training, everything was documented, the supervisor and the mine got fined because ''they let it happened'' basically the only way would be to have 100% supervision and no accident... So I ask what is the point of all these SOP's if they don't protect the company? the answer was basically they are the difference between a fine and prison was the answer I got.Too often the owner is the reason for unsafe practices in the first place; whether it's failure to supply adequate tiedowns, or expecting their employees to run overloaded.