Building a bridge: PT or rough cut??

[fried1765]

I knew a German craftsman who never stopped working on his property. Built stuff of wood. Then he realized the stuff was falling apart before he ever got the whole place finished. He moved to concrete, masonry and steel and never looked back. In the right application, wood has it's place and can last hundreds of years. No one seems to care how short the life of stuff is anymore it seems. As long as no evil chemicals are employed. Imagine all that creosote that must have leached into rivers over the years on those huge timer tressle bridges?

Ah....but just think about it.
All that creosote probably collected in the backwaters downstream, and killed the mosquito larvae :laughing:.

 

[Industrial Toys]

No! Made them stronger! For what doesn't kill you . . .

I love watching Periscope films. Watching one yesterday about the WABCO grader. No Cab or Rops! Just lubricate these components with Diesel Fuel and Engine oil, no matter how much falls on the ground. Same with checking fuel for water. A good stream on the ground will do fine.

 

[ovrszd]

It's my opinion that the frame spanning the creek is way more important than what kind of boards you lay on top of it.

I don't think railroad tracks were ever intended to be used to span a gap. I don't see them having much weight bearing ability. If I was doing this I would build a center pier for them to sit on dividing the span in half.

I would also connect my decking boards in some manner so I didn't have to drill the rails. Maybe tread boards? If you do that your wood will fail first where two boards lay on top of each other.

 

[Industrial Toys]

I didn't catch that. OMG. RR track is no good in that application at all. Both shape wise and in composition. TOTALLY unsuitable. A wide flange beam of the same weight per foot would be much, much more suitable.

 

[/pine]

To see how much rail steel deflects skip ahead to about the 1:40 minute mark...

Train laying new tracks - YouTube

 

[Industrial Toys]

Ah, but that rig is designed by Juri Geller.


I have a good long one here and can't for the life of me think of a use for it.

 

[jymbee]

Interesting project. More questions than answers. I agree that if you space the rails to the width of your tractor the wood is a minor factor. Any idea how much deflection there will be? I would be tempted to make a temporary set up on dry ground to check the deflection. How do you attach the wood to the rails. My impression is that the rails are a pretty hard material, more that just run of the mill steel. Will you mount the rails in their normal orientation or upside down to have a wider mounting flange.
Doug in SW IA

A temporary setup for testing purposes is a good suggestion. I've had numerous suggestions/ideas as to how to install the wood decking and am still assessing the options there.

For overall stability the idea was to use the rails in their normal orientation.

 

[jymbee]

It's my opinion that the frame spanning the creek is way more important than what kind of boards you lay on top of it.

I don't think railroad tracks were ever intended to be used to span a gap. I don't see them having much weight bearing ability. If I was doing this I would build a center pier for them to sit on dividing the span in half.

Right-- obviously when trains had to cross a river for example they built a trestle first, then laid the tracks on top.

I think the idea of a center pier of some kind is sound, but that brings up another issue of how to build that solid enough to withstand occasional high water conditions when this quiet little stream turns into a raging river of mud/stones, etc. There's been a pedestrian bridge here for years built with 2 4x4 PT beams and PT decking. Lost count of the number of times I had to go searching downstream after high water to find that bridge caught up in brush somewhere. Designing a pier of some type to withstand high water would be a challenge. Also, with the new bridge the rails will be high enough to stay out of high water period-- hopefully. It also seems that the heavy steel could withstand running water better than wood alone, but of course nature might have something to say about that.

I would also connect my decking boards in some manner so I didn't have to drill the rails. Maybe tread boards? If you do that your wood will fail first where two boards lay on top of each other.

Agree-- don't want to think about having to drill through the rails!

 

[jymbee]

I have a good long one here and can't for the life of me think of a use for it.

:laughing: I bet if you started a thread here asking for ideas, you'd be amazed what folks would come up with!

 

[jymbee]

I didn't catch that. OMG. RR track is no good in that application at all. Both shape wise and in composition. TOTALLY unsuitable. A wide flange beam of the same weight per foot would be much, much more suitable.

Can't argue that wide flange beams would be ideal but that's simply way out of the budget for this particular project.

I'm reading interesting information about deflection with this type of steel rail, but I've yet to see any information as to whether there's a documented point of failure under various loads. As I wrote earlier, these rails were originally the support for a very highly used farm lane which crossed this stream. That bridge used 3 of these rails to span the stream (don't know what they used for deckling as that had washed away long ago) and was used by tractors pulling manure spreaders, hay wagons, cars, farm trucks etc.

As an old farmer I'm reminded of the old "This Old House" episodes where Bob Vila would take apart some old farmhouse or barn and be critical of construction techniques as they didn't live up to his ideals. Uh... sorry Bob but back in those days, farmers used what they had, within the budget they had, and time they had to do it. And guess what-- most of the time it worked just fine.

Anyway... here, about two feet on each side will be on large flat rocks so that leaves an actual span of sixteen feet or so. I'm more than willing to listen to anyone might have information as what kind of risk this might involve for the intended purpose.