N80
Super Member
I agree with MarkV. I think the minimum HP you should be looking at is 30. The next step is to define your budget. If your budget was tight, I'd bag the HST and get a geared or GST machine. That way, you get more tractor for your money.
Faced with those constraints myself, which included a max budget of $20K, I got an L4400. It has 45 hp and around 40 at the PTO. It is closer to a utility tractor in spec but is still small and fairly light. It has capable, but not exceptional hydraulic capacity that is considerably higher than the models mentioned so far. But it only comes in a gear transmission, which I've grown quite fond of.
I'm in the minority here, by a long shot, but I did not find HST to be worth the money (for me) and after two years of heavy loader work, mowing, land clearing, moving brush, plowing, serious landscaping/dirt moving, I have been totally pleased with the robust gear transmission. I've also found that any less hp would have been a detriment to me.
I'm clearly biased towards the L4400 and geared transmissions (it has wildly exceeded my expectations) so take all that for what its worth. I just thought you might appreciate a different take on the issue. In my opinion, the lack of HST is what makes the L4400 the most 'bang for the buck' in the Kubota line if shear capability at a low price is what you are looking for. I'd say the geared L3400 would be a close second.
Rumor has it that an HST L4400 is in the works. At the time I bought mine, the HST would have busted my budget and I suspect I'd still get the gear model today.
Faced with those constraints myself, which included a max budget of $20K, I got an L4400. It has 45 hp and around 40 at the PTO. It is closer to a utility tractor in spec but is still small and fairly light. It has capable, but not exceptional hydraulic capacity that is considerably higher than the models mentioned so far. But it only comes in a gear transmission, which I've grown quite fond of.
I'm in the minority here, by a long shot, but I did not find HST to be worth the money (for me) and after two years of heavy loader work, mowing, land clearing, moving brush, plowing, serious landscaping/dirt moving, I have been totally pleased with the robust gear transmission. I've also found that any less hp would have been a detriment to me.
I'm clearly biased towards the L4400 and geared transmissions (it has wildly exceeded my expectations) so take all that for what its worth. I just thought you might appreciate a different take on the issue. In my opinion, the lack of HST is what makes the L4400 the most 'bang for the buck' in the Kubota line if shear capability at a low price is what you are looking for. I'd say the geared L3400 would be a close second.
Rumor has it that an HST L4400 is in the works. At the time I bought mine, the HST would have busted my budget and I suspect I'd still get the gear model today.