Any way to improve FEL hydraulics?

   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #1  

strantor

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2018
Messages
966
Location
Brazoria co., TX
Tractor
LS XR4140H
The hydraulic perfomance of my XR4140H FEL leaves room for improvement.

Firstly, it doesn't seem to want to lift and curl at the same time. I use pallet forks 90% of the time and this being not an auto-levelling FEL, trying to raise/lower the forks level turns into a jaggy series lift/curl/lift/curl/lift/curl movements. If I have my RPM set real high and I have enough load on the forks, sometimes I can lift level with a semi-fluid motion, but usually not. Any way to improve that?

Also the bleed-down rate seems higher than reasonable. I realize all hydraulics have some amount of bleed-down, but based on my experience with other hydraulic machinery, I would expect that if I lift my forks to waist-height and turn the tractor off, 24-48hrs later it might touch the ground. But this one will be on the ground within an hour. Any adjustments I can make to minimize that?
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #2  
It does sound like something is wrong with the valve. It might be worth having it torn apart and checked for debris.
My tractor is bigger (6168) , but with 400lb pallet forks installed, my loader only drops about 1-2 inches in 24 hours.
The not lifting and curling at the same time is common on lots of tractors. Mine is self leveling, so I don’t try it very often, but it isn’t the easiest to find that sweet spot. That may just be normal operation, but dropping more than 1 inch per hour seems a bit excessive to me.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #3  
The leak down rate is pretty fast but probably typically for a cheap valve. I’ve used several tractors where the FEL valve didn’t multitask very good.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #4  
Replace the valve with one that has all the bells and whistles.
Joy stick, float and regen.

When two functions are called for, lift and curl for instance, it is always the path of least resistance. So as your bucket loads may vary, and the boom geometry changes with lift, motion will reflect those subtle changes in resistance.

If you had double the pump capacity, so pressure exceeded load constantly, the motion could smooth out some.

A high capacity pump is the next step towards what you are looking for.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #5  
Replace the valve with one that has all the bells and whistles.
Joy stick, float and regen.

When two functions are called for, lift and curl for instance, it is always the path of least resistance. So as your bucket loads may vary, and the boom geometry changes with lift, motion will reflect those subtle changes in resistance.

If you had double the pump capacity, so pressure exceeded load constantly, the motion could smooth out some.

A high capacity pump is the next step towards what you are looking for.

I think the new valve is the only fix and it’s not cheap. I can multitask pretty smooth with my tractors.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics?
  • Thread Starter
#6  
Sounds like the characteristics of an open center hydraulic system. No cure. :confused3:

I don't really know what I'm talking about, BUT... I don't think it's an open center system. Per my understanding, if it were an open center system, it would be literally only possible to actuate one function at a time. On this loader I can actuate lift and curl at the same time, but it's difficult and only works if the engine RPMs are sufficiently high. Does that still sound like an open center system? (Serious question, not being sarcastic)
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #7  
I think you’re right that it’s not. Otherwise you couldn’t operate the tractor without jumper hoses when the loader was removed. I think a backhoe is open center but you can operate multiple functions at once.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics?
  • Thread Starter
#8  
I think you’re right that it’s not. Otherwise you couldn’t operate the tractor without jumper hoses when the loader was removed. I think a backhoe is open center but you can operate multiple functions at once.

Devils advocate: I should mention, the FEL valves are on the tractor and stay with the tractor when the FEL is removed. So there is room for possibility of it being open center without needing jumper hoses. (Not accounting for the semi-operability of two functions simultaneously)
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics?
  • Thread Starter
#9  
Replace the valve with one that has all the bells and whistles.
Joy stick, float and regen.

When two functions are called for, lift and curl for instance, it is always the path of least resistance. So as your bucket loads may vary, and the boom geometry changes with lift, motion will reflect those subtle changes in resistance.

If you had double the pump capacity, so pressure exceeded load constantly, the motion could smooth out some.

A high capacity pump is the next step towards what you are looking for.

I'm investigating what you've said in tandem with the open/closed center thing. Assuming the worst (it's an open center system with a fixed displacement pump) then if I were to upgrade the valve (to closed center) then I would need to upgrade the pump (to variable displacement) with higher flow. If I do that then I'm in a whole new realm with complicated hydraulics involving load sensing functions and other gotchas. Does that sound right?

If so, rather than teach myself to be a hydraulic circuit engineer and make a lot of expensive mistakes, it would probably behoove me to lay eyes on a tractor with a properly designed modern hydraulic circuit and write down some part numbers, obtain some system drawings, and reverse engineer. What tractor(s) should I be looking at? What tractors have efficient hydraulic systems with variable displacement, closed center valves, hydraulic regen, functional load sensing, all the bells and whistles and no bugs?
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics?
  • Thread Starter
#10  
I've had a look into the service manual and confirmed the open center system & fixed displacement (gear) pump. @K7LN you were right, I was wrong.

Capture0.PNGCapture.PNG

After tracing out the hydraulic schematic I realized a few more limitations imposed on me by this system, that I hadn't realized before because I've never needed to use them. I've only had this tractor a few months and in that time pretty much only used it as a forklift.

  • I can't lift the 3-point while moving the FEL
  • I can't use the FEL while using either of my remotes
  • I can only use one remote at a time
  • I probably can't engage the PTO while running the FEL or remotes (unable to test, but I did confirm that once PTO is engaged it stays engaged and other hydraulic functions work)

I brainstormed on the question "ok, so then how is it possible that I can lift + curl occasionally, if I have enough engine RPM and I feather the controls?" This is the hypothesis I came up with:

PART A: The directional control valves are not "digital" (bang-bang), but more "analog" (proportional) when hand-operated between extremes. If I pull the FEL joystick all the way back (lift), then 100% of the flow is sent to the lift cylinders and 0% of the flow is permitted to continue downstream to the curl valve, aux valves, and 3-pt. But if I only pull half-way back on the joystick, then 50% of the flow is diverted into the lift cylinders, and the other 50% is permitted to continue on through the valve and in theory should be available to the downstream valves. That part of the hypothesis I feel pretty confident about. The following is just a fart in the wind suspicion...

PART B: NOW, if I try to use that remaining 50% of flow to actually do some work, things get wonky. When I start actuating downstream valves, that causes backpressure on the lift valve that I'm currently feathing @ 50% by hand. The downstream load robs from from FEL lift load, and the original 100% pressure @ 50% flow is no longer available to the lift cylinders. If the backpressure generated by downstream load (let's say curl) exceeds the pressure needed to continue lifting, then lift ceases altogether (and theoretically could start lowering back down, maybe... IDK) and that downstream load may or may not work to some extent, or at all. In this case, the only way to get any measure of success in actuating the two functions at once, is to go balls-to-the-wall with the pump and hope that there's enough pressure and flow to satisfy both series valves at least to the extent that you get some minor amount of movement in the desired direction.

Does that sound correct? It at least seems to explain my observations. When I fully actuate any of the valves which are in series, none of the other valves work (I think upstream valves have precedence) and when I feather any two of the series valves simultaneously, weird inconsistent (sometimes desirable) things happen.


Moving on, the diagnosis of "no cure" seems reasonably accurate. But I'm not always reasonable. I'm kicking around a few ideas; here's the seemingly most promising one:

FEL lift mod.png

I change the open center series valves for FEL with plain DCVs plumbed in parallel. To prevent the pump pushing full flow over a relief valve any time the FEL isn't moving (and to enable continued use of downstream functions: AUX & 3-point) I install a normally open solenoid bypass valve. Microswitches get installed on all 4 axes of the joystick, so that any time the joystick is centered, the entire FEL circuit is bypassed and fluid only goes to AUX & 3-point. Any time I move the joystick in any direction, the solenoid actuates and the FEL is switched back into the circuit. While the FEL is in the circuit, the valves are in parallel, so both should be presented the same pressure and be free to consume as much flow as they require.

Seem like plausible solution?
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics?
  • Thread Starter
#11  
Back to the sagging issue...
I ran a little test to isolate the issue to leaky cylinders or leaky valves. It's definitely the valves.

I raised the FEL to 36" off the ground and set the fork tips level at 36." Turn the tractor off, set timer for 1hr, come back and measure. Fork tips dropped 4.5" overall (1.25" lost in lift + 3.25" in curl). Reset position, turn tractor off, disconnect FEL QDs, set 1hr timer, measure. Lost 0.25" overall (half and half between lift & curl).
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #12  
The lift didn’t loose any on the second test except what fluids were in the quick connects. The test was unnecessary.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics?
  • Thread Starter
#13  
Giving the open center series valve situation some more thought, I think it would be more prudent to keep any/all mods confined to the FEL and leave the tractor itself unmolested.

Firstly, If I'm going to void a warranty, I would rather not void the entire tractor warranty. Voiding just the FEL warranty is "fine" I guess LOL.

Secondly, none of this would have come up if I'd had a self-levelling FEL. I would have had no reason to dig into hydraulic schematics or learn the difference between open center and closed center hydraulics, and subsequently become unsatisfied with my tractor. I went down this hydraulic rabbit hole mainly because of the trouble I was having coordinating lift & curl. The bleeding down was a minor issue. Everything I'm complaining about would cease to be an issue if I convert the FEL to self-levelling and install some manual hydraulic lock-out valves on it to prevent sag when I want to use the forks as a work platform (which is often, actually). Converting the FEL seems totally doable actually. This guy did it, and if he can, I don't see why I can't. I do that, and then bury my head in the sand and pretend I don't have subpar hydraulics, I think I can go back to my happy place.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #14  
The hydraulic perfomance of my XR4140H FEL leaves room for improvement.

Firstly, it doesn't seem to want to lift and curl at the same time. I use pallet forks 90% of the time and this being not an auto-levelling FEL, trying to raise/lower the forks level turns into a jaggy series lift/curl/lift/curl/lift/curl movements. If I have my RPM set real high and I have enough load on the forks, sometimes I can lift level with a semi-fluid motion, but usually not. Any way to improve that?

Also the bleed-down rate seems higher than reasonable. I realize all hydraulics have some amount of bleed-down, but based on my experience with other hydraulic machinery, I would expect that if I lift my forks to waist-height and turn the tractor off, 24-48hrs later it might touch the ground. But this one will be on the ground within an hour. Any adjustments I can make to minimize that?

Sorry to be a bit cheeky but the only way to improve the machine loader hydraulics/performance is to buy a different machine.

If it won't do double acting functions as OEM then you are fighting a losing battle. If you need double acting and self levelling buy a machine that does it already or be prepared to have an expensive hobby with many disappointments - or embrace the machine you have and live with its abilities.

FYI a LOT of AG/CUT tractors will not do what you want or are expecting them to do.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics?
  • Thread Starter
#15  
Sorry to be a bit cheeky but the only way to improve the machine loader hydraulics/performance is to buy a different machine.

If it won't do double acting functions as OEM then you are fighting a losing battle. If you need double acting and self levelling buy a machine that does it already or be prepared to have an expensive hobby with many disappointments - or embrace the machine you have and live with its abilities.

FYI a LOT of AG/CUT tractors will not do what you want or are expecting them to do.

This is my first tractor. I bought it in a hurry to fill an immediate need, without much research or preparation. I am not known for making impulse purchases (especially on something so expensive), but this was a special case. Now that I have it, and it's financed, I feel very "locked in." Perhaps my dealer would let me trade it in (only has 30hrs on it) but I'm thinking not. I guess it's worth inquiring about.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #16  
Please keep us updated on this. I too didn't realize the limitations of the hydraulic system on my tractor. Replacing the FEL Valve seems like a daunting task (not the actual removal and install, but finding the proper one that will fix the issues.)
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #17  
I don't really know what I'm talking about, BUT... I don't think it's an open center system. Per my understanding, if it were an open center system, it would be literally only possible to actuate one function at a time. On this loader I can actuate lift and curl at the same time, but it's difficult and only works if the engine RPMs are sufficiently high. Does that still sound like an open center system? (Serious question, not being sarcastic)

Strantor,
Yes you can multifunction with an open center system just not easily. You must feather both valves so that a portion of the flow goes to both functions. The operator must constantly adjust for any change in load.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics?
  • Thread Starter
#18  
Please keep us updated on this. I too didn't realize the limitations of the hydraulic system on my tractor. Replacing the FEL Valve seems like a daunting task (not the actual removal and install, but finding the proper one that will fix the issues.)

I will keep you updated but don't hold your breath for a hydraulic solution. As I said, I don't plan on tampering with anything that could void my tractor warranty, and even if I did, to my current knowledge the proper fix would not be as simple as just upgrading the FEL valve. The pump, and all the valves would have to changed; the entire system converted to a closed center system. The only potential shortcuts are the modified circuit I posted earlier (which I have no idea if it would work), and you might want to pick up where I left off in researching an upgaded FEL valve with hydraulic "power beyond." If I do anything to this tractor it will probably be a mechanical self-levelling FEL modification.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics?
  • Thread Starter
#19  
Strantor,
Yes you can multifunction with an open center system just not easily. You must feather both valves so that a portion of the flow goes to both functions. The operator must constantly adjust for any change in load.

Yeah I've tried that. On this tractor it usually doesn't work and when it does it's really slow and irritating.
 
   / Any way to improve FEL hydraulics? #20  
strantor,
Some valve companies offer a series / parallel valve option. What this does is that it directs the return flow from the lift - lower spool to the cur - dump spool. This way the flow returning from the lift circuit can be used for the curl circuit. I believe some Kubota models have or had this feature.
Installing a valve with this feature would be beneficial to performing multiple functions.
 

Marketplace Items

KUBOTA M125X TRACTOR (A60430)
KUBOTA M125X...
2006 Nissan Murano AWD SUV (A59231)
2006 Nissan Murano...
2005 Nissan Frontier Crew Cab Pickup Truck (A59230)
2005 Nissan...
JOHN DEERE 5075E TRACTOR (A60430)
JOHN DEERE 5075E...
2014 DODGE RAM 2500 (A58214)
2014 DODGE RAM...
SCAN TO RECEIVE TEXT UPDATES (A60429)
SCAN TO RECEIVE...
 
Top