OP
Indydirtfarmer
Platinum Member
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( John, Those are really nice looking units. Be careful if you ever sell them. I have a neighbor dealer that made modifications to JD planters and sold them in places like Ebay and other public venues and was doing really well until he got a registered letter from JD's Lawyer. Best I remember, it stated to immediatly stop selling modified JD products as John Deere or face legal action. The dealer kept selling his units, however, he did stop using the JD decals and calling them John Deere units in his sales presentation. ---Ken Sweet )</font>
I've been down that road with JD already. It was over reproduction toys that had Deere emblems on them. I got a clarification on the issue before starting on the planters.
One, Deere no longer makes the #71 planter units. They're patents have ran out. Yetter Manufacturing now owns any production "rights". I buy replacement parts through Deere. I use licensed Deere decals in my "restoration". I'm in no way modifying the planter unit itself. All original parts, assembled as Deere did themselves. I'm claiming no improvements or modifications. According to Deere, (per a letter I have on file) The #71 flex planter was sold originaly as a "unit planter" intended for use on various mounting systems. (read improvised mountings) As long as the original planter unit is not compromised, altered, modified, or improved, there is no risk of patent or copyright infringements. All is contingent upon using O.E.M. parts on the units themselves, if intended for re-sale, and represented as "John Deere model #71 flex-planter units".
SO... To make a long story short, Mother Deere says "Sell'em"!
I've been down that road with JD already. It was over reproduction toys that had Deere emblems on them. I got a clarification on the issue before starting on the planters.
One, Deere no longer makes the #71 planter units. They're patents have ran out. Yetter Manufacturing now owns any production "rights". I buy replacement parts through Deere. I use licensed Deere decals in my "restoration". I'm in no way modifying the planter unit itself. All original parts, assembled as Deere did themselves. I'm claiming no improvements or modifications. According to Deere, (per a letter I have on file) The #71 flex planter was sold originaly as a "unit planter" intended for use on various mounting systems. (read improvised mountings) As long as the original planter unit is not compromised, altered, modified, or improved, there is no risk of patent or copyright infringements. All is contingent upon using O.E.M. parts on the units themselves, if intended for re-sale, and represented as "John Deere model #71 flex-planter units".
SO... To make a long story short, Mother Deere says "Sell'em"!