The manufacturer makes decisions that may or may not fit a particular person's situation. They may make decisions based solely on cost to them.
This is so so true. The manufacturing engineer has to choose processes
and materials that make the manufacturing process as fast and efficient
as possible, without unduly compromising durability. I can think of many
many cases where the factory choice is not the ideal one for an end user
who wants maximum long-term durability. It is not that I think I am smarter
than the tractor maker; I just have different priorities.
Perhaps low-vis hyd fluid is chosen by the factory for some front axles
because it can be filled quickly. I know that getting gear oil into some
axles takes a long time, esp when there is a fill hole on only one side.
When a factory chooses paper gaskets over silicone, assembly is faster, but
oil leaks after a few years are more likely.
When hardened pins are used in loaders, the pins and bushings wear more
evenly, allowing for more time before repair is necessary. I prefer a softer
pin so IT wears out before the bushing. I may have to replace the pin
sooner, but the much more difficult bushing repair is avoided. The maker
chooses the best compromise from his perspective.
Same with non-vented axles. The maker has made the judgment that adding
vents could invite more problems than the lack of vents would create.
Finally, if one sticks doggedly to the manufacturer's service specs for oil
changes, I know of at least one car company that says the tranny fluid is
"lifetime". No changes. What long-term owner is going to stick with that?