I am a bow hunter and a gun hunter (shotgun, black powder, and .308 rifle) and I have had pretty good success as well as some misses (injury to the animal) with all of them. Not equally, but all.
I prefer the bow hunting, as it is a much quieter sport, requires a lot of careful planning, set-up, waiting, and watching many animals which are part of nature (not the same with gun hunting). After many hours, a chance at the 'hunted' is the payoff, and where the excitement begins. Dissappointment is only when the shot isn't well-placed and a killing one. But usually it isn't a careless shot.
I don't want to 'argue' which is better, or 'more' killing as this is what the 'anti's' want to see. It's already been well said earlier in this thread several times.
Those who want to bow hunt should be able to, as long as a human being isn't being hurt. Those who don't like it, then don't do it. Simple as that, IMO.
I don't see any more or less suffering with killing a fish vs. killing an animal. One in the same, IMO. Flies, bugs, deer, squirrels, pheasants, quail, beetles, worms, grubs, moles, mice, rats, ants, moths, etc. are all of the same and equal, IMO. I hunt them all with weapons of choice.
/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif