400x/cx with skid steer quick attach

[JB Farm]

Does anyone have a 400x or 400cx loader with the skid steer attachment on it? I am close to ordering my new tractor but can not figure out if I want the SSQA or not. I was going to get it with the heavy duty bucket and then modify the bucket with a QA plate welded on. After doing some measuring I don't think that will be my best option since the QA plate is taller than the flat back on the HD bucket (could work but look bad).

So I am wondering what others have for a bucket that got the SSQA option. Anyone have pictures of their setup that they could post? I thought about getting a Kubota bucket factory made with the QA, and could also get a Deere foundry bucket. The Kubota would be the right shape and size. The foundry bucket I know nothing about, would it hold too much for the loader and look strange. Any pictures of one?

Thanks

 

[KB9UDE]

I use the standard JD quick connect loader mounts for all my loaders (200cx, 300cx, 400x, 400cx, 460). Never had the skid steer attach. Only benefit I can see is more universal attachments.

 

[Johndeere3720]

I haven't used the 400CX but I have used JD skid steer quick attach on a CT322 and it is very nice. It will allow you to use any skid steer attachment your tractor can handle. It is also really easy to lock and unlock your attachments. Yet the JD QA system is also very easy.

 

[magicheater]

I'd take a look at this one. Seems there are a lot more possibilities than just skid steer quick attachments!

 

[Spudland_Dave]

I got my 300cx with the SSQA, Wouldnt be without it.
I'd also suggest NOT modifying the standard bucket for a couple reasons. Its been a while, but if you go to the JD Configurator, they give you a credit if you get the loader LESS bucket (for me I got 500.00) take that 500.00 or whatever it is these days, and apply that towards a Real Skid Steer bucket.

Another reason I say to do that is the back angle of the JD bucket vs SSQA Buckets, all SSQA attachments & buckets use the same back angle, so no matter what brand or attachment I have on my loader, the level indicator is always spot on, AND it provides for adequate rollback.

Long story short, without a doubt i'd go SSQA, I love mine.

 

[om21braz]

On the 400X loader I had, the standard JD quick connect mounting. It worked very well - swapping out between the bucket and pallet forks. All changing done on concrete - can't speak for changing on uneven surface or SSQA. Just depends on what you plan on using mounted to the loader.

 

[UnclePaul]

I have a 300cx loader with SSQA with a frontier SSQA bucket on it. I love the SSQA it makes life easy. It is also nice if you want to make your own implements to just buy a blank mount and build on that.

 

[Rockgod]

I have a 300cx loader with SSQA with a frontier SSQA bucket on it. I love the SSQA it makes life easy. It is also nice if you want to make your own implements to just buy a blank mount and build on that.

I ordered the SSQA for my 400x. Haven't had a chance to use it yet but here is a couple of photos.

 

[Rockgod]

So I am wondering what others have for a bucket that got the SSQA option. Anyone have pictures of their setup that they could post? I thought about getting a Kubota bucket factory made with the QA, and could also get a Deere foundry bucket. The Kubota would be the right shape and size. The foundry bucket I know nothing about, would it hold too much for the loader and look strange. Any pictures of one?

Thanks

Oh, I ordered the Workpro 72" bucket. I'll try to get a photo next time I'm at the dealer.

 

[JB Farm]

Thanks for all replies. Could you tell me about the Workpro 72" bucket. Is it a Deere? If not who makes it, is there a web sight that shows it? I was going to order the tractor this week minus a bucket and am now leaning toward a 72" bucket made by Bobcat for their CUT's. It looks well built, has a nice upper lip that would be very hard to bend and a nice wide top for welding hooks on. At only $750 it is priced better than Deere's HD bucket. It looks similar to this one....

"72" X-Treme Duty General Purpose Compact Tractor Loader Bucket"

Sorry, I don't know how to link, but a search as stated will yield the bucket to look at. The main difference is the Bobcat has a heavy round pipe for the upper lip.


Thanks for the pictures of the loader, those mounts sure look tough.

 

[jd110]

I hate to go against the popular vote, but I prefer the standard quik tach. The SSQA adds considerable weight to the loader and front of your tractor. That effectively reduces the amount of weight you can lift in the bucket. Not only is the attaching plate heavy, but the SS buckets and attachments are considerably heavier than the comparable 400 series buckets. The only time I recommend SSQA is if you also have a skid steer and can swap attachments back and forth. FWIW

 

[AKfish]

I hate to go against the popular vote, but I prefer the standard quik tach. The SSQA adds considerable weight to the loader and front of your tractor. That effectively reduces the amount of weight you can lift in the bucket. Not only is the attaching plate heavy, but the SS buckets and attachments are considerably heavier than the comparable 400 series buckets. The only time I recommend SSQA is if you also have a skid steer and can swap attachments back and forth. FWIW

'Course they're heavier... they're made for construction work! And after a few years - 10, 15, 20 they still don't look like those pictures of the "weeny, greeny" bent up ones, either!!!

And what's the REAL difference... the green HD bucket is fairly heavy and the mounts on the SSQA must be all of 100lbs.

So, what are we really talking about 200lbs or less?

I ordered the SSQA on my new 5075M, too. I swap 2 buckets, forks, grapple and trailer ball hitch back and forth.

Can't do that easily with the JD system - without paying a premium over the SS attachments - and sacrifice durability.

AKfish

 

[Rockgod]

I found a short video if the JDSS, It shows how it operates with both the manual end electric version. It's used on the SS, 110, and our CUT's

Its at the bottom of the page labled "Quick-tatch"


Buckets from JohnDeere

 

[Spudland_Dave]

...now leaning toward a 72" bucket made by Bobcat for their CUT's. It looks well built, has a nice upper lip that would be very hard to bend and a nice wide top for welding hooks on. At only $750 it is priced better than Deere's HD bucket.

I was going to mention doing something like that in my previous post, but didnt know if you prefered "One Stop Shopping".. My Bro has the 68" Version of that bucket on his CT230, and like you said, its a nice bucket. BUT its no skid steer bucket. Comparing it to the Worksite Pro or other "Genuine" Skid Steer bucket is an unfair comparison. My 60" Foundry Bucket (true Skid Steer Bucket) is way heavier built and would be considered "SUPER Duty" compared to CUT Bucket. If you care about the weight thing, go with a CUT Bucket with SSQA mounts. If you want a true heavy duty bucket, go with a Genuine Skid Steer Bucket. Hey, I guess thats another benefit of the SSQA, your options are limitless!

Course they're heavier... they're made for construction work! And after a few years - 10, 15, 20 they still don't look like those pictures of the "weeny, greeny" bent up ones, either!!!

Bingo. Also agree on your weight statement. In the grand scale of things, theres more weight on the bucket itself (on a good bucket) then the carrier. I've not been in a position or application where 100 lbs made the difference between shoveling by hand or using my loader.

I know I've done things I probably shouldnt have with my bucket, still straight as an arrow, looking good minus the paint

Another "Side Benefit" I see is the ease of purchasing SSQA Attachments. Much more common to find em on CL or what have you. Seems most of the brand specific attachments go with the machine when traded or sold. Its not every day I see JDQA buckets or Forks on CL, but SSQA versions are plentiful and relatively cheap.