2014 Dodge Ram HD

Code54 · Jul 9, 2013

I personally don't mind the front end. Sort of looks like the front on my 12....
I agree the numbers seem a little low for that size of motor, seems there should be some room for a bit more HP!

fordmantpw · Jul 9, 2013

jejeosborne said:
If they are the exact same engine are you saying they are not reporting the peak numbers? That wouldn't make sense. Obviously something is different in the tuning because they always report peak values. Maybe the 1/2 ton engines are tuned for premium fuel.

Exact same engine, the numbers aren't for premium. The F150 reports peak numbers, I think the F2/350 reports numbers at a certain RPM. I don't remember the exact reason (and I can't find it now), but something to do with SAE standards for heavy duty truck engines.

Diamondpilot · Jul 9, 2013

dodge man said:
Park one of your Fords in front of a mirror and say that.

I personally think the 99 through 07 Super Duty trucks are the best looking. Same time period Dodges like the 03 2500 but this new one is just awful.

My opinion

Chris

WilliamBos · Jul 9, 2013

Diamondpilot said:
I personally think the 99 through 07 Super Duty trucks are the best looking. Same time period Dodges like the 03 2500 but this new one is just awful.

My opinion

Chris

I loved the look of my friends 07 F 350 4x4 Crew Cab... Rode nice for a 1 ton too!!

If the MPG's increase a lit with SCR, I'd seriously consider a Ram 2500.

wmonroe · Jul 9, 2013

I like the new technology they are exploring, it's nice to see someone not doing the same old thing. Maybe when the 2015 models come out I might have to check them out.