Dog and the Mail Lady

[Jstpssng]

The Federal Government has deep enough pockets if their carriers gets attacked to resolve anything needed-- again, demanding that has nothing to do with ensuring the safety of their carrier

That doesn't matter. If your negligence- in this case keeping an at-risk dog- causes loss to one of their employees, you should be the person paying.

 

[tradosaurus]

Everyone should have a permit to own a dog.

 

[tradosaurus]

Of course not but only if the dog is on YOUR property not mine and even then you need a valid reason.

Some "valid" reasons I've heard from country folks taking care of nuisance dogs are getting into trash, going after livestock, going after their pets.
I found that BB's are a great non-lethal deterrent.

 

[Eagle1]

Some "valid" reasons I've heard from country folks taking care of nuisance dogs are getting into trash, going after livestock, going after their pets.
I found that BB's are a great non-lethal deterrent.

I would consider those valid if any of mine were to do that on some other property. I like one chance to fix it but lethal if needed. It is what it is, my job to control my animals.

 

[Quaffer]

I found that BB's are a great non-lethal deterrent.

Here is another option:

 

[WinterDeere]

It is what it is, my job to control my animals.

Agreed. The problem is that, particularly for those is more urbanized areas, they're surrounded by too many people who don't take care of their own.

 

[Eagle1]

Agreed. The problem is that, particularly for those is more urbanized areas, they're surrounded by too many people who don't take care of their own.

Seems like that applies to children as well.......