NoTrespassing
Elite Member
The original battery was failing, so if it had a 50 mile range it now has a 150 mile range.Seriously upgraded if it goes 3x further
The original battery was failing, so if it had a 50 mile range it now has a 150 mile range.Seriously upgraded if it goes 3x further
In my asthetic view, the Rivan is even fuglier than the CT. The front end reminds me of a puffer fish.Motor Trend did a comparison article, testing the CT, the Ford Lightning, and the Rivian R1T. The R1T won.
Interesting that the CT was the lightest by 200 lb, but all were near 7000 lb. The Ford was cheapest, at just under $100K, and the other 2, just over $100K. Before taxes and registration.
All lost as much as half of their range, towing a 3500# trailer.
I love the Rivian numbers, but hate the cosmetics.Rivian R1T. The R1T won.
1000 hp passenger cars and pickup trucks have never been cheap. When viewed from that perspective, Rivian's pricing really doesn't seem so absurd.I don't consider any vehicle that costs over 100 grand to be inexpensive...
You got that right. Like they are trying the design the most ugly vehicle and sell it for the biggest bucks. Least the Ford looks like a pickup truck.I love the Rivian numbers, but hate the cosmetics.
Hey... I think I said the same thing about the CyberTruck.
It's like all of these EV truck manufacturers are trying their hardest to design vehicles no truck buyer will ever want to drive. Hasn't anyone told them it's not that hard to stick with more-traditional styling?
You got that right. Like they are trying the design the most ugly vehicle and sell it for the biggest bucks. Least the Ford looks like a pickup truck.
I watch ads for all the new 'electric' vehicles and in my view, they are all varing degrees of fugly.
One ad I find to be particularly bad is the one for the Lincoln hybrid with the black gal and the microphone. I have yet to figure out what the ad agency is attempting to get across. I know one thing and that is, If I was paying that ad agency to do an ad like that, They'd be terminated, immediately.
I agree to a point and that point is none of them are REALLY worth the asking price and what drives me to only buy off lease vehicles where the origional lessor pays down the inflated cost and gets nothing in return.1000 hp passenger cars and pickup trucks have never been cheap. When viewed from that perspective, Rivian's pricing really doesn't seem so absurd.
The Dodge SRT-10's ran around $50k, way back in 2004, and they were only a 500 hp 2wd truck. That inflates to nearly $90k today, for a truck that's about as useless as they come.
So by that comparison, $100k - $120k for 1000 hp on a 4wd chassis seems downright reasonable.
Choices and preferences are about individual tastes as are costs. Some folks may not like the styling og my Ford Focus RS Trubo, but I do. It's a royal PITA to get in and out of but once in the Recarro bucket seats and the 3 point racing harness gives you a sense of security even in the tiny box it is.After driving my Y for the last 2 years I see the majority of ICE vehicles as boring and downright ugly. My ICE coversion to Tesla experience must be like the experience going from horse/buggy to the Model T.
You will always pay a premium price for premium power, no matter what it is because with the power comes the advanced technology to produce that power and my Focus RS Turbo is no exception. Never seen a 'stripped down' Fodus RS Turbo, I don't believe any exist, consequently, the sticker price new was absurd. Why, when I found mine (and it took some serious serching), I grabbed it, after researching who was the origional leasee. People don't as a rule, buy an RS turbo to drive to the grocery store and today, most people cannot drive a 6 speed close ratio manual gearbox anyway. It too kme almost 6 months to find mine and the first owner was a female, middle aged and single which told me it was an impulse lease, plus it was extremely low mileage. The RS turbo's are extremely high maintenance vehicles, something I looked at as well. The engines were made in Germany for Fords, NA and installed in the cars at Wayne Assembly and I knew every detail of it's previous life, down to the tires, before I bought it and I was still a bit apprehensive anyway.1000 hp passenger cars and pickup trucks have never been cheap. When viewed from that perspective, Rivian's pricing really doesn't seem so absurd.
By Flop, I mean they aren't selling. It looks like they may sell 20,000 this year compared to the 250,000 or 500,000 number they threw around. Tesla doesn't break out the truck from their sales numbers so it's impossible to tell how many they sold per quarter. It looks like inventories are swelling and production is slowing.Flop or not entirely depends on what you want to spend your money on. I like my Cousin's Cyber truck but I'd never own one.
By Flop, I mean they aren't selling. It looks like they may sell 20,000 this year compared to the 250,000 or 500,000 number they threw around. Tesla doesn't break out the truck from their sales numbers so it's impossible to tell how many they sold per quarter. It looks like inventories are swelling and production is slowing.
Motor Trend did a comparison article, testing the CT, the Ford Lightning, and the Rivian R1T. The R1T won.
Interesting that the CT was the lightest by 200 lb, but all were near 7000 lb. The Ford was cheapest, at just under $100K, and the other 2, just over $100K. Before taxes and registration.
All lost as much as half of their range, towing a 3500# trailer.
Yeah, that's what I want to encounter on our curvy and narrow country roads, as the soccer mom is headed around the bend in the wrong lane towards me, while yelling at a kid and texting.These things weigh about as much as a Super Duty.
If Tesla does a price reduction on the CT like they did on the 3, Y, X back in early 2023 they will probably increase sales. The CT foundation series needs to come in about $55K, instead of $75K.By Flop, I mean they aren't selling. It looks like they may sell 20,000 this year compared to the 250,000 or 500,000 number they threw around. Tesla doesn't break out the truck from their sales numbers so it's impossible to tell how many they sold per quarter. It looks like inventories are swelling and production is slowing.
Thanks for doing a great job of explaining the math as to our range experience with the 2016 Leaf SL that we bought with 22K miles in 2019 as an EV test bed.The original battery was failing, so if it had a 50 mile range it now has a 150 mile range.