Sad to see that Honda is ditching the Rincon

[cdaigle430]

I have been a Honda ATV owner since 90s, last ATV I purchased I still own. It is a yellow 2004 Honda Rincon, brought me so much fun and helps so much around the house. Was even able to pull a 1200 pound moose from the woods one hunting season.
Honda decided to ditch the Rincon and added a feature or two to the Rubicon-which is also a great ATV.

Funny how I paid 6,200 dollars in 2003 for my 2004 Rincon and in 2023 the Rincon costs 9,600. True they added EFI, 20 more CC and Electric steering but thats it. My 2004 runs like new even with 5,000 miles on it.

 

[ArlyA]

Might be time for something new? Do like our BRP product.

 

[cdaigle430]

I will probably go sxs next like a rzr.

 

[5030]

Good friend has one and it's a rocket ship and way too fast for me. W@e have a Kubota side by side with the Subaru EFI gas motor and it goes 50 and that is plenty fast for this old fart and my wife. It's 4 wheel drive with a 2 speed gearcase and has a nice bed on the back. I usually have a 100 gallon spray rig in the back and it handles the weight just fine.

 

[square1]

I can't count on one hand the models Honda foolishly discontinued! Also can't remember any of them because Honda just keeps coming up with better and better products that make me forget how upset I was they discontinued the Honda "X"

 

[ArlyA]

I will probably go sxs next like a rzr.

Oh, you are looking for a sport machine. I know very little about them.

 

[workinonit]

Good friend has one and it's a rocket ship and way too fast for me. W@e have a Kubota side by side with the Subaru EFI gas motor and it goes 50 and that is plenty fast for this old fart and my wife. It's 4 wheel drive with a 2 speed gearcase and has a nice bed on the back. I usually have a 100 gallon spray rig in the back and it handles the weight just fine.

I have a 40 gallon in my Polaris Ranger. Pretty much all it needs as far as weight. I know it wouldn't carry 850 pounds.

 

[sandman2234]

I have a 40 gallon in my Polaris Ranger. Pretty much all it needs as far as weight. I know it wouldn't carry 850 pounds.

Toro Workman 3200 rated dump capacity is 2150 pounds!
David from jax

 

[workinonit]

Nice! If I'm gonna haul 2100 pounds it won't be in a UTV. But I guess that is needed for some folks. Besides that, that thing is not very attractive.

 

[5030]

I have a 40 gallon in my Polaris Ranger. Pretty much all it needs as far as weight. I know it wouldn't carry 850 pounds.

Ours will Kubota GS850, no issue but I did opt for the HD rear suspension. Just spraying smooth hayfields with it, 2-4-D B and out of date (or frozen) DEF, which cannot be sold anymore. Great foiliar innoculant for Alfalfa.

 

[Bronco82]

Absolutely love Honda atv's. Grew up on an ATC 200M, the family hunt camp still has an 85 Big Red, and I just purchased an 87 Honda 200sx quad for my kids. Honda's are hard to beat when it comes to reliability.

 

[Blue Mule]

My first ever ATV was a Honda back in 1987. I bought a new Honda in 2021 also. But other than that I've had Arctic Cat, Polaris, Can-Am, and Suzuki and honestly I'm quite shocked that Honda still does so well with sales. Honda ATVs are low power, low feature machines with very high price tags. I could be wrong but even their top of the line model is less than 40 HP. Conversely, the competitors give you that same power on their entry models, and their top of the line models are as much as 100 HP. Also, Honda has traditionally used smaller tires, old fashioned drum brakes and solid axles on most models, and no CVTs are available. This means that Honda is behind the competition in every single metric.

Having said that, Honda does make quality machines and I suppose their sales numbers show that people still value quality over specs and features.

 

[JeepHead]

My first ever ATV was a Honda back in 1987. I bought a new Honda in 2021 also. But other than that I've had Arctic Cat, Polaris, Can-Am, and Suzuki and honestly I'm quite shocked that Honda still does so well with sales. Honda ATVs are low power, low feature machines with very high price tags. I could be wrong but even their top of the line model is less than 40 HP. Conversely, the competitors give you that same power on their entry models, and their top of the line models are as much as 100 HP. Also, Honda has traditionally used smaller tires, old fashioned drum brakes and solid axles on most models, and no CVTs are available. This means that Honda is behind the competition in every single metric.

Having said that, Honda does make quality machines and I suppose their sales numbers show that people still value quality over specs and features.

I will take quality over specs and features ANY day! That's why I own a Honda Rubicon and a Kubota tractor. Love my Rubicon, it's a beast of a work machine that never lets me down. Same with my Kubota...

 

[John_Mc]

My first ever ATV was a Honda back in 1987. I bought a new Honda in 2021 also. But other than that I've had Arctic Cat, Polaris, Can-Am, and Suzuki and honestly I'm quite shocked that Honda still does so well with sales. Honda ATVs are low power, low feature machines with very high price tags. I could be wrong but even their top of the line model is less than 40 HP. Conversely, the competitors give you that same power on their entry models, and their top of the line models are as much as 100 HP. Also, Honda has traditionally used smaller tires, old fashioned drum brakes and solid axles on most models, and no CVTs are available. This means that Honda is behind the competition in every single metric.

Having said that, Honda does make quality machines and I suppose their sales numbers show that people still value quality over specs and features.

I have zero need for nor interest in a 100 HP "go-fast" ATV. I was looking for a smaller, lighter-weight SxS to take out in my woods when conditions were a bit too soft more my tractor. One of the reasons I settled on a Honda Pioneer 520 was actually the transmission. The it's reliable and engine braking works well. I will agree on the tires. Stock is 24". However, that is easily dealt with. I have 27" on it now.

 

[WilliamBos]

I have been a Honda ATV owner since 90s, last ATV I purchased I still own. It is a yellow 2004 Honda Rincon, brought me so much fun and helps so much around the house. Was even able to pull a 1200 pound moose from the woods one hunting season.
Honda decided to ditch the Rincon and added a feature or two to the Rubicon-which is also a great ATV.

Funny how I paid 6,200 dollars in 2003 for my 2004 Rincon and in 2023 the Rincon costs 9,600. True they added EFI, 20 more CC and Electric steering but thats it. My 2004 runs like new even with 5,000 miles on it.

They never ditched it, they renamed it the Rubicon.

https://powersports.honda.com/atv/recutility/fourtrax-rubicon-4x4

 

[LittleBill21]

They never ditched it, they renamed it the Rubicon.

https://powersports.honda.com/atv/recutility/fourtrax-rubicon-4x4

jesh, looks like a polaris now., rubicon was always a model. it was below the rincon.

 

[Hay Dude]

Might be time for something new? Do like our BRP product.View attachment 954246

How’d you get those spotlights mounted to your head?

 

[WilliamBos]

jesh, looks like a polaris now., rubicon was always a model. it was below the rincon.

The Rubicon is the best package Honda offers. When they released the Foreman Rubicon in Canada, Rincon sales tanked so bad that Honda stopped selling it up here.

 

[LittleBill21]

The Rubicon is the best package Honda offers. When they released the Foreman Rubicon in Canada, Rincon sales tanked so bad that Honda stopped selling it up here.

When i bought my atv 02 rancher. the rubicon was a cheaper quad. it was built off the forman frame, and still needed manual shifting. it was also solid rear axle. and was around 5400 hundred if i remember, the rincon was an automatic and irs and bigger engine and faster. it was a trail bike, and retailed around 6k.

the Rincon was considered the best "trail" bike at the time, i believe it might have been a 650, but we are going years back. all i know was it fast and nimble, it was not a utility atv, more of a crossover with the sports

 

[Sprinkler Fitter]

When i bought my atv 02 rancher. the rubicon was a cheaper quad. it was built off the forman frame, and still needed manual shifting. it was also solid rear axle. and was around 5400 hundred if i remember, the rincon was an automatic and irs and bigger engine and faster. it was a trail bike, and retailed around 6k.

the Rincon was considered the best "trail" bike at the time, i believe it might have been a 650, but we are going years back. all i know was it fast and nimble, it was not a utility atv, more of a crossover with the sports

Bike?